1 files changed, 44 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gcc-4.9/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/impure_assignment_3.f90 b/gcc-4.9/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/impure_assignment_3.f90
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..8be19896e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc-4.9/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/impure_assignment_3.f90
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+! { dg-do compile }
+!
+! PR 43169: [OOP] gfortran rejects PURE procedure with SELECT TYPE construct
+!
+! Original test case by Todd Hay <haymaker@mail.utexas.edu>
+! Modified by Janus Weil <janus@gcc.gnu.org>
+
+  implicit none
+  real :: g
+
+contains
+
+  pure subroutine sub1(x)
+    type :: myType
+      real :: a
+    end type myType
+    class(myType), intent(inout) :: x
+    real :: r3
+    select type(x)
+    class is (myType)
+      x%a = 42.
+      r3 =  43.
+      g = 44.             ! { dg-error "variable definition context" }
+    end select
+  end subroutine
+
+  pure subroutine sub2
+    real :: r1
+    block
+      real :: r2
+      r1 = 45.
+      r2 = 46.
+      g = 47.             ! { dg-error "variable definition context" }
+    end block
+  end subroutine
+
+  pure subroutine sub3
+    block
+      integer, save :: i  ! { dg-error "cannot be specified in a PURE procedure" }
+      integer :: j = 5    ! { dg-error "is not allowed in a PURE procedure" }
+    end block
+  end subroutine
+
+end