diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc-4.8.1/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c90-arraydecl-1.c')
-rw-r--r-- | gcc-4.8.1/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c90-arraydecl-1.c | 30 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 30 deletions
diff --git a/gcc-4.8.1/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c90-arraydecl-1.c b/gcc-4.8.1/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c90-arraydecl-1.c deleted file mode 100644 index 2b7eadbf6..000000000 --- a/gcc-4.8.1/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c90-arraydecl-1.c +++ /dev/null @@ -1,30 +0,0 @@ -/* Test for C99 forms of array declarator: rejected in C90. */ -/* Origin: Joseph Myers <jsm28@cam.ac.uk> */ -/* { dg-do compile } */ -/* { dg-options "-std=iso9899:1990 -pedantic-errors" } */ - -/* Use of [*] (possibly with type qualifiers) in an array declarator with - function prototype scope is a C99 feature. GCC does not yet implement - it correctly, so gives a warning about this. so we can't yet test here - that we get just one error and no warnings. */ - -void foo0 (int a, int b[*]); /* { dg-error "ISO C90" "\[*\] not in C90" } */ -void foo1 (int, int [*]); /* { dg-error "ISO C90" "\[*\] not in C90" } */ - - -/* Use of static and type qualifiers (not allowed with abstract declarators) - is a C99 feature. */ - -void bar0 (int a[const]); /* { dg-bogus "warning" "warning in place of error" } */ -/* { dg-error "ISO C90" "\[quals\] not in C90" { target *-*-* } 18 } */ -void bar1 (int a[const 2]); /* { dg-bogus "warning" "warning in place of error" } */ -/* { dg-error "ISO C90" "\[quals expr\] not in C90" { target *-*-* } 20 } */ -void bar2 (int a[static 2]); /* { dg-bogus "warning" "warning in place of error" } */ -/* { dg-error "ISO C90" "\[static expr\] not in C90" { target *-*-* } 22 } */ -void bar3 (int a[static const 2]); /* { dg-bogus "warning" "warning in place of error" } */ -/* { dg-error "ISO C90" "\[static quals expr\] not in C90" { target *-*-* } 24 } */ -void bar4 (int a[const static 2]); /* { dg-bogus "warning" "warning in place of error" } */ -/* { dg-error "ISO C90" "\[quals static expr\] not in C90" { target *-*-* } 26 } */ - -/* Because [*] isn't properly implemented and so warns, we don't test here - for [const *] yet. */ |