Initial checkin of GCC 4.9.0 from trunk (r208799).

Change-Id: I48a3c08bb98542aa215912a75f03c0890e497dba

1 files changed, 48 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/gcc-4.9/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/use_iso_c_binding.f90 b/gcc-4.9/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/use_iso_c_binding.f90
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..99323d601
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc-4.9/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/use_iso_c_binding.f90
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+! { dg-do compile }
+! this is to simply test that the various ways the use statement can 
+! appear are handled by the compiler, since i did a special treatment 
+! of the intrinsic iso_c_binding module.  note: if the user doesn't 
+! provide the 'intrinsic' keyword, the compiler will check for a user 
+! provided module by the name of iso_c_binding before using the 
+! intrinsic one.  --Rickett, 09.26.06
+module use_stmt_0
+  ! this is an error because c_ptr_2 does not exist 
+  use, intrinsic :: iso_c_binding, only: c_ptr_2 ! { dg-error "Symbol 'c_ptr_2' referenced at \\(1\\) not found" }
+end module use_stmt_0
+
+module use_stmt_1
+  ! this is an error because c_ptr_2 does not exist 
+  use iso_c_binding, only: c_ptr_2 ! { dg-error "Symbol 'c_ptr_2' referenced at \\(1\\) not found" }
+end module use_stmt_1
+
+module use_stmt_2
+  ! works fine
+  use, intrinsic :: iso_c_binding, only: c_ptr
+end module use_stmt_2
+
+module use_stmt_3
+  ! works fine
+  use iso_c_binding, only: c_ptr
+end module use_stmt_3
+
+module use_stmt_4
+  ! works fine
+  use, intrinsic :: iso_c_binding
+end module use_stmt_4
+
+module use_stmt_5
+  ! works fine
+  use iso_c_binding
+end module use_stmt_5
+
+module use_stmt_6
+  ! hmm, is this an error?  if so, it's not being caught...
+  ! --Rickett, 09.13.06
+  use, intrinsic :: iso_c_binding, only: c_int, c_int
+end module use_stmt_6
+
+module use_stmt_7
+  ! hmm, is this an error?  if so, it's not being caught...
+  ! --Rickett, 09.13.06
+  use iso_c_binding, only: c_int, c_int
+end module use_stmt_7