diff options
author | Caroline Tice <cmtice@google.com> | 2016-03-16 13:56:07 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Caroline Tice <cmtice@google.com> | 2016-03-16 13:56:07 -0700 |
commit | ac16f08b86701ecf70e32f4ead8db63d92603808 (patch) | |
tree | 08f5e73c8a8f3c980468347bcc0c283bc1e6d3eb /gcc-4.9/gcc/loop-init.c | |
parent | 3a800d7d75ceba88429096186a2150a2d938334a (diff) | |
download | toolchain_gcc-ac16f08b86701ecf70e32f4ead8db63d92603808.tar.gz toolchain_gcc-ac16f08b86701ecf70e32f4ead8db63d92603808.tar.bz2 toolchain_gcc-ac16f08b86701ecf70e32f4ead8db63d92603808.zip |
GCC unification, part 2. Fix various errors from previous unificaiton.
The previous version of the unified GCC compiler (Android & ChromeOS)
caused some ChromeOS tests to fail. It also caused an Android NDK
test case to fail. This CL fixes those problems. In particular it
does the following:
- Fix some file formatting errors from previous unification patch.
- Update ChangeLog files to reflect Android backport patches.
- Find and incorporate a few missing pieces from the following backports
backports from trunk r221007, r221675, r222011, r212011, r214942,
r214957, r215012, r215016, r218115, r218733, r218746, r220491. This
involved small changes in the following files:
gcc/cfghoks.c
gcc/cfgloop.c
gcc/cfgloop.h
gcc/except.c
gcc/loop-init.c
gcc/omp-low.c
- Fix minor Android test case regression introduced in the previous
unification patch.
Change-Id: I482e3a34e3ed97c7ba609fe2954b4781f02ec617
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc-4.9/gcc/loop-init.c')
-rw-r--r-- | gcc-4.9/gcc/loop-init.c | 27 |
1 files changed, 27 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gcc-4.9/gcc/loop-init.c b/gcc-4.9/gcc/loop-init.c index 4cc561c2e..a8abf372a 100644 --- a/gcc-4.9/gcc/loop-init.c +++ b/gcc-4.9/gcc/loop-init.c @@ -272,6 +272,33 @@ fix_loop_structure (bitmap changed_bbs) FOR_EACH_VEC_ELT (*get_loops (cfun), i, loop) if (loop && loop->header == NULL) { + if (dump_file + && ((unsigned) loop->former_header->index + < basic_block_info_for_fn (cfun)->length ())) + { + basic_block former_header + = BASIC_BLOCK_FOR_FN (cfun, loop->former_header->index); + /* If the old header still exists we want to check if the + original loop is re-discovered or the old header is now + part of a newly discovered loop. + In both cases we should have avoided removing the loop. */ + if (former_header == loop->former_header) + { + if (former_header->loop_father->header == former_header) + fprintf (dump_file, "fix_loop_structure: rediscovered " + "removed loop %d as loop %d with old header %d\n", + loop->num, former_header->loop_father->num, + former_header->index); + else if ((unsigned) former_header->loop_father->num + >= old_nloops) + fprintf (dump_file, "fix_loop_structure: header %d of " + "removed loop %d is part of the newly " + "discovered loop %d with header %d\n", + former_header->index, loop->num, + former_header->loop_father->num, + former_header->loop_father->header->index); + } + } (*get_loops (cfun))[i] = NULL; flow_loop_free (loop); } |