diff options
| author | Anders Larsen <al@alarsen.net> | 2010-04-08 11:48:16 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> | 2010-04-09 08:31:04 +0100 |
| commit | 9823f1a8463fb631fe965110fe19adeb3df239c4 (patch) | |
| tree | e55e3f1a8ba2f1dee33a3d189061027e34fd4c15 /MAINTAINERS | |
| parent | bb3c9d4f851d51bb6302ef0df830dcec88d7c529 (diff) | |
| download | kernel_samsung_smdk4412-9823f1a8463fb631fe965110fe19adeb3df239c4.tar.gz kernel_samsung_smdk4412-9823f1a8463fb631fe965110fe19adeb3df239c4.tar.bz2 kernel_samsung_smdk4412-9823f1a8463fb631fe965110fe19adeb3df239c4.zip | |
ARM: 6043/1: AT91 slow-clock resume: Don't wait for a disabled PLL to lock
at91 slow-clock resume: Don't wait for a disabled PLL to lock.
We run into this problem with the PLLB on the at91: ohci-at91 disables
the PLLB when going to suspend. The slowclock code however tries to do
the same: It saves the PLLB register value and when restoring the value
during resume, it waits for the PLLB to lock again. However the PLL will
never lock and the loop would run into its timeout because the slowclock
code just stored and restored an empty register.
This fixes the problem by only restoring PLLA/PLLB when they were enabled
at suspend time.
Cc: Andrew Victor <avictor.za@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Anders Larsen <al@alarsen.net>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Diffstat (limited to 'MAINTAINERS')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions