aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/test
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'test')
-rw-r--r--test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/2008-11-18-Stride1.ll4
-rw-r--r--test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/2008-11-18-Stride2.ll5
-rw-r--r--test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/2008-12-15-DontUseSDiv.ll1
-rw-r--r--test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/trip-count3.ll3
-rw-r--r--test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/trip-count9.ll10
-rw-r--r--test/Transforms/IndVarSimplify/loop_evaluate_6.ll5
-rw-r--r--test/Transforms/IndVarSimplify/no-iv-rewrite.ll9
7 files changed, 20 insertions, 17 deletions
diff --git a/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/2008-11-18-Stride1.ll b/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/2008-11-18-Stride1.ll
index 74698795ca..7acf90c733 100644
--- a/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/2008-11-18-Stride1.ll
+++ b/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/2008-11-18-Stride1.ll
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
; RUN: opt < %s -analyze -scalar-evolution | FileCheck %s
-; CHECK: Loop %bb: Unpredictable backedge-taken count.
+; CHECK: Loop %bb: backedge-taken count is ((-5 + %x) /u 3)
+; CHECK: Loop %bb: max backedge-taken count is 1431655764
+
; ScalarEvolution can't compute a trip count because it doesn't know if
; dividing by the stride will have a remainder. This could theoretically
diff --git a/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/2008-11-18-Stride2.ll b/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/2008-11-18-Stride2.ll
index 0ee69c6d30..2b2296a3a2 100644
--- a/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/2008-11-18-Stride2.ll
+++ b/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/2008-11-18-Stride2.ll
@@ -1,7 +1,8 @@
; RUN: opt < %s -analyze -scalar-evolution 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
-; XFAIL: *
-; CHECK: /u 3
+; CHECK: Loop %bb: backedge-taken count is ((999 + (-1 * %x)) /u 3)
+; CHECK: Loop %bb: max backedge-taken count is 334
+
; This is a tricky testcase for unsigned wrap detection which ScalarEvolution
; doesn't yet know how to do.
diff --git a/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/2008-12-15-DontUseSDiv.ll b/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/2008-12-15-DontUseSDiv.ll
index d40044e7f8..70588bc057 100644
--- a/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/2008-12-15-DontUseSDiv.ll
+++ b/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/2008-12-15-DontUseSDiv.ll
@@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
; RUN: opt < %s -analyze -scalar-evolution 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
-; XFAIL: *
; CHECK: /u 5
diff --git a/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/trip-count3.ll b/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/trip-count3.ll
index 32c51bfc45..850e035e7c 100644
--- a/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/trip-count3.ll
+++ b/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/trip-count3.ll
@@ -4,7 +4,8 @@
; dividing by the stride will have a remainder. This could theoretically
; be teaching it how to use a more elaborate trip count computation.
-; CHECK: Loop %bb3.i: Unpredictable backedge-taken count.
+; CHECK: Loop %bb3.i: backedge-taken count is ((64 + (-64 smax (-1 + (-1 * %0))) + %0) /u 64)
+; CHECK: Loop %bb3.i: max backedge-taken count is 33554431
%struct.FILE = type { i32, i8*, i8*, i8*, i8*, i8*, i8*, i8*, i8*, i8*, i8*, i8*, %struct._IO_marker*, %struct.FILE*, i32, i32, i64, i16, i8, [1 x i8], i8*, i64, i8*, i8*, i8*, i8*, i64, i32, [20 x i8] }
%struct.SHA_INFO = type { [5 x i32], i32, i32, [16 x i32] }
diff --git a/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/trip-count9.ll b/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/trip-count9.ll
index 85d4050249..9a080b3474 100644
--- a/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/trip-count9.ll
+++ b/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/trip-count9.ll
@@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ exit:
}
; CHECK: Determining loop execution counts for: @even_step2
-; CHECK: Loop %loop: Unpredictable backedge-taken count.
+; CHECK: Loop %loop: backedge-taken count is ((-1 + (2 * %n)) /u 2)
; CHECK: Loop %loop: max backedge-taken count is 2
define void @even_step2(i4 %n) {
entry:
@@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ exit:
}
; CHECK: Determining loop execution counts for: @even_start1_step2
-; CHECK: Loop %loop: Unpredictable backedge-taken count.
+; CHECK: Loop %loop: backedge-taken count is ((-2 + (3 smax (2 * %n))) /u 2)
; CHECK: Loop %loop: max backedge-taken count is 2
define void @even_start1_step2(i4 %n) {
entry:
@@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ exit:
; CHECK: Determining loop execution counts for: @even_startx
; CHECK: Loop %loop: backedge-taken count is (-1 + (-1 * %x) + ((1 + %x) smax (2 * %n)))
-; CHECK: Loop %loop: max backedge-taken count is -1
+; CHECK: Loop %loop: max backedge-taken count is -2
define void @even_startx(i4 %n, i4 %x) {
entry:
%m = shl i4 %n, 1
@@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ exit:
}
; CHECK: Determining loop execution counts for: @even_startx_step2
-; CHECK: Loop %loop: Unpredictable backedge-taken count.
+; CHECK: Loop %loop: backedge-taken count is ((-1 + (-1 * %x) + ((2 + %x) smax (2 * %n))) /u 2)
; CHECK: Loop %loop: max backedge-taken count is 7
define void @even_startx_step2(i4 %n, i4 %x) {
entry:
@@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ exit:
; CHECK: Determining loop execution counts for: @even_nsw_startx
; CHECK: Loop %loop: backedge-taken count is (-1 + (-1 * %x) + ((1 + %x) smax (2 * %n)))
-; CHECK: Loop %loop: max backedge-taken count is -1
+; CHECK: Loop %loop: max backedge-taken count is -2
define void @even_nsw_startx(i4 %n, i4 %x) {
entry:
%m = shl i4 %n, 1
diff --git a/test/Transforms/IndVarSimplify/loop_evaluate_6.ll b/test/Transforms/IndVarSimplify/loop_evaluate_6.ll
index da38de538f..af01fe5386 100644
--- a/test/Transforms/IndVarSimplify/loop_evaluate_6.ll
+++ b/test/Transforms/IndVarSimplify/loop_evaluate_6.ll
@@ -1,9 +1,4 @@
; RUN: opt < %s -indvars -loop-deletion -S | grep phi | count 1
-; XFAIL: *
-
-; Indvars can't evaluate this loop, because ScalarEvolution can't compute
-; an exact trip count, because it doesn't know if dividing by the stride will
-; have a remainder. It could be done with more aggressive VRP though.
define i32 @test(i32 %x_offs) nounwind readnone {
entry:
diff --git a/test/Transforms/IndVarSimplify/no-iv-rewrite.ll b/test/Transforms/IndVarSimplify/no-iv-rewrite.ll
index 507f695e67..057669277c 100644
--- a/test/Transforms/IndVarSimplify/no-iv-rewrite.ll
+++ b/test/Transforms/IndVarSimplify/no-iv-rewrite.ll
@@ -223,13 +223,18 @@ entry:
%halfLim = ashr i32 %limit, 2
br label %loop
-; Test cloning an or, which is not an OverflowBinaryOperator.
+; This test originally checked that the OR instruction was cloned. Now the
+; ScalarEvolution is able to understand the loop evolution and that '%iv' at the
+; end of the loop is an even value. Thus '%val' is computed at the end of the
+; loop and the OR instruction is replaced by an ADD keeping the result
+; equivalent.
;
; CHECK: loop:
; CHECK: phi i64
; CHECK-NOT: sext
-; CHECK: or i64
+; CHECK: icmp slt i32
; CHECK: exit:
+; CHECK: add i64
loop:
%iv = phi i32 [ 0, %entry], [ %iv.next, %loop ]
%t1 = sext i32 %iv to i64