aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/lib/Transforms/Scalar/IndVarSimplify.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDan Gohman <gohman@apple.com>2010-01-21 02:09:26 +0000
committerDan Gohman <gohman@apple.com>2010-01-21 02:09:26 +0000
commita10756ee657a4d43a48cca5c166919093930ed6b (patch)
tree52a9cf0b867521026963ca127f6a46d19f0f8f78 /lib/Transforms/Scalar/IndVarSimplify.cpp
parentac8b4bf66b7263018fe6c133604a30780c24982e (diff)
downloadexternal_llvm-a10756ee657a4d43a48cca5c166919093930ed6b.tar.gz
external_llvm-a10756ee657a4d43a48cca5c166919093930ed6b.tar.bz2
external_llvm-a10756ee657a4d43a48cca5c166919093930ed6b.zip
Re-implement the main strength-reduction portion of LoopStrengthReduction.
This new version is much more aggressive about doing "full" reduction in cases where it reduces register pressure, and also more aggressive about rewriting induction variables to count down (or up) to zero when doing so reduces register pressure. It currently uses fairly simplistic algorithms for finding reuse opportunities, but it introduces a new framework allows it to combine multiple strategies at once to form hybrid solutions, instead of doing all full-reduction or all base+index. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@94061 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/Transforms/Scalar/IndVarSimplify.cpp')
-rw-r--r--lib/Transforms/Scalar/IndVarSimplify.cpp14
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Transforms/Scalar/IndVarSimplify.cpp b/lib/Transforms/Scalar/IndVarSimplify.cpp
index ce1307c8df..17f7d98509 100644
--- a/lib/Transforms/Scalar/IndVarSimplify.cpp
+++ b/lib/Transforms/Scalar/IndVarSimplify.cpp
@@ -471,6 +471,13 @@ void IndVarSimplify::RewriteIVExpressions(Loop *L, const Type *LargestType,
// Compute the final addrec to expand into code.
const SCEV *AR = IU->getReplacementExpr(*UI);
+ // Evaluate the expression out of the loop, if possible.
+ if (!L->contains(UI->getUser())) {
+ const SCEV *ExitVal = SE->getSCEVAtScope(AR, L->getParentLoop());
+ if (ExitVal->isLoopInvariant(L))
+ AR = ExitVal;
+ }
+
// FIXME: It is an extremely bad idea to indvar substitute anything more
// complex than affine induction variables. Doing so will put expensive
// polynomial evaluations inside of the loop, and the str reduction pass
@@ -522,11 +529,10 @@ void IndVarSimplify::RewriteIVExpressions(Loop *L, const Type *LargestType,
Rewriter.clear();
// Now that we're done iterating through lists, clean up any instructions
// which are now dead.
- while (!DeadInsts.empty()) {
- Instruction *Inst = dyn_cast_or_null<Instruction>(DeadInsts.pop_back_val());
- if (Inst)
+ while (!DeadInsts.empty())
+ if (Instruction *Inst =
+ dyn_cast_or_null<Instruction>(DeadInsts.pop_back_val()))
RecursivelyDeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions(Inst);
- }
}
/// If there's a single exit block, sink any loop-invariant values that