diff options
author | Hans Boehm <hboehm@google.com> | 2014-07-12 19:29:49 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Gerrit Code Review <noreply-gerritcodereview@google.com> | 2014-07-11 23:26:34 +0000 |
commit | 981dcd79d5cbfb2192dc14706e2825b81a467af7 (patch) | |
tree | c4f8bffa65709f4bcd433af4554be614305000c9 | |
parent | 56cbd19b1b8a42a0011be78aa1051304bc57127d (diff) | |
parent | 5af7877950ea5f96b6522e5210966365ece04e25 (diff) | |
download | system_core-981dcd79d5cbfb2192dc14706e2825b81a467af7.tar.gz system_core-981dcd79d5cbfb2192dc14706e2825b81a467af7.tar.bz2 system_core-981dcd79d5cbfb2192dc14706e2825b81a467af7.zip |
Merge "Add comment to discourage use of cutils/atomic.h."
-rw-r--r-- | include/cutils/atomic.h | 35 |
1 files changed, 33 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/include/cutils/atomic.h b/include/cutils/atomic.h index 1787e3438..b9b18c44f 100644 --- a/include/cutils/atomic.h +++ b/include/cutils/atomic.h @@ -25,8 +25,20 @@ extern "C" { #endif /* - * A handful of basic atomic operations. The appropriate pthread - * functions should be used instead of these whenever possible. + * A handful of basic atomic operations. + * THESE ARE HERE FOR LEGACY REASONS ONLY. AVOID. + * + * PREFERRED ALTERNATIVES: + * - Use C++/C/pthread locks/mutexes whenever there is not a + * convincing reason to do otherwise. Note that very clever and + * complicated, but correct, lock-free code is often slower than + * using locks, especially where nontrivial data structures + * are involved. + * - C11 stdatomic.h. + * - Where supported, C++11 std::atomic<T> . + * + * PLEASE STOP READING HERE UNLESS YOU ARE TRYING TO UNDERSTAND + * OR UPDATE OLD CODE. * * The "acquire" and "release" terms can be defined intuitively in terms * of the placement of memory barriers in a simple lock implementation: @@ -74,6 +86,17 @@ int32_t android_atomic_or(int32_t value, volatile int32_t* addr); /* * Perform an atomic load with "acquire" or "release" ordering. * + * Note that the notion of a "release" ordering for a load does not + * really fit into the C11 or C++11 memory model. The extra ordering + * is normally observable only by code using memory_order_relaxed + * atomics, or data races. In the rare cases in which such ordering + * is called for, use memory_order_relaxed atomics and a leading + * atomic_thread_fence (typically with memory_order_acquire, + * not memory_order_release!) instead. If you do not understand + * this comment, you are in the vast majority, and should not be + * using release loads or replacing them with anything other than + * locks or default sequentially consistent atomics. + * * This is only necessary if you need the memory barrier. A 32-bit read * from a 32-bit aligned address is atomic on all supported platforms. */ @@ -88,6 +111,14 @@ int64_t android_atomic_release_load64(volatile const int64_t* addr); /* * Perform an atomic store with "acquire" or "release" ordering. * + * Note that the notion of a "acquire" ordering for a store does not + * really fit into the C11 or C++11 memory model. The extra ordering + * is normally observable only by code using memory_order_relaxed + * atomics, or data races. In the rare cases in which such ordering + * is called for, use memory_order_relaxed atomics and a trailing + * atomic_thread_fence (typically with memory_order_release, + * not memory_order_acquire!) instead. + * * This is only necessary if you need the memory barrier. A 32-bit write * to a 32-bit aligned address is atomic on all supported platforms. */ |