diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/DISTRO-DILEMMA')
| -rw-r--r-- | docs/DISTRO-DILEMMA | 22 |
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/docs/DISTRO-DILEMMA b/docs/DISTRO-DILEMMA index 108e6bad..2d317fdb 100644 --- a/docs/DISTRO-DILEMMA +++ b/docs/DISTRO-DILEMMA @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ GnuTLS OpenSSL does. Now, you can build and distribute an TLS/SSL capable libcurl without including any Original BSD licensed code. - I believe Debian is the first (only?) distro that provides libcurl/GnutTLS + I believe Debian is the first (only?) distro that provides libcurl/GnuTLS packages. yassl @@ -72,20 +72,20 @@ GnuTLS vs OpenSSL vs yassl While these three libraries offer similar features, they are not equal. libcurl does not (yet) offer a standardized stable ABI if you decide to - switch from using libcurl-openssl to libcurl-gnutls or vice versa. The GnuTLS + switch from using libcurl-openssl to libcurl-gnutls or vice-versa. The GnuTLS and yassl support is very recent in libcurl and it has not been tested nor used very extensively, while the OpenSSL equivalent code has been used and thus matured since 1999. GnuTLS - - LGPL licensened + - LGPL licensed - supports SRP - lacks SSLv2 support - lacks MD2 support (used by at least some CA certs) - lacks the crypto functions libcurl uses for NTLM OpenSSL - - Original BSD licensened + - Original BSD licensed - lacks SRP - supports SSLv2 - older and more widely used @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ The Better License, Original BSD, GPL or LGPL? In Debian land, there seems to be a common opinion that LGPL is "maximally compatible" with apps while Original BSD is not. Like this: - http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/09/msg01417.html + https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/09/msg01417.html More SSL Libraries @@ -163,13 +163,13 @@ Distro Angle of this Problem Footnotes [1] = http://www.xfree86.org/3.3.6/COPYRIGHT2.html#6 - [2] = http://www.fsf.org/licensing/essays/bsd.html - [3] = http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl.html + [2] = https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/bsd.html + [3] = https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html [4] = http://curl.haxx.se/docs/copyright.html - [5] = http://www.openssl.org/source/license.html - [6] = http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl.html end of section 3 - [7] = http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/lgpl.html - [8] = http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenSSL_exception + [5] = https://www.openssl.org/source/license.html + [6] = https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html end of section 3 + [7] = https://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl.html + [8] = https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenSSL_exception Feedback/Updates provided by |