Importing the missing part from the NLnet document

I got the permission by mail to publish it under both the
CC0 and the CC-BY-SA-4.0:
  From: Michiel Leenaars
  To: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
  Subject: Re: MoU and RFP's
  Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 12:29:36 +0100
  Organization: NLnet Foundation

  Hi Denis,

  >> However I also need Nlnet's permission to make it public as part of
  >> the text inside it is probably under NLnet's copyright.
  >>
  >> My part is published under the CC-BY-SA-3.0 or CC-BY-SA-4.0 Creative ...

  yes, as original authors we own the copyright. And for us it is perfectly
  fine to share this under a CC0 or CC-BY-SA-4.0 license.

  Best,
  Michiel

As I've fixed some spelling mistakes in the original
document, it is best to re-license my work as well under the
exact same free software licenses that was suggested by mail
to make sure that they are not prevented from importing or
re-doing the fixes.

It also allows to more easily re-use part of this document to
apply for grants for other projects.

Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>

1 files changed, 21 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/NLnet/porting_replicant_to_android9/README b/NLnet/porting_replicant_to_android9/README
index d45b598..b19b90a 100644
--- a/NLnet/porting_replicant_to_android9/README
+++ b/NLnet/porting_replicant_to_android9/README
@@ -1,4 +1,23 @@
 == License ==
 This project is licensed under either under the Creative Commons
-Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-SA 3.0) or (at your option) the
-Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0).
+Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) or the
+Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal.
+
+== Trademarks ==
+Note that trademarks and copyright laws are completely different[1].
+
+Copyright licenses like the Creative Commons licenses or the GPL do
+not give any trademarks rights.
+
+In short it means that if you are not already entitled to represent
+the NLnet foundation, the Replicant project, the individuals
+mentioned in the document or other entities, then you still cannot
+do that as usual free software licenses don't give recipients any
+trademarks rights.
+
+However copyrighted work under free software licenses can still be
+modified to make it clear that the modified document does not
+missrepresent individuals, projects, organisations, or other
+entities.
+
+[1]https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/not-ipr.html