aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/gcc-4.9/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/builtin-stringop-chk-2.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc-4.9/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/builtin-stringop-chk-2.c')
-rw-r--r--gcc-4.9/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/builtin-stringop-chk-2.c137
1 files changed, 137 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gcc-4.9/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/builtin-stringop-chk-2.c b/gcc-4.9/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/builtin-stringop-chk-2.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..7c2bb6098
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc-4.9/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/builtin-stringop-chk-2.c
@@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
+/* This file was miscompiled by an earlier version of the object size
+ checking patch. Object size in one of the memcpy calls was
+ incorrectly determined to be 0 while it should be (size_t) -1
+ (== unknown). */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -ftrack-macro-expansion=0" } */
+
+#include "../gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/chk.h"
+
+void *bar (int);
+extern void *malloc (__SIZE_TYPE__);
+
+struct A
+{
+ int i, j, k;
+};
+
+/* Here all object sizes are not known at compile time. There
+ should be no warning, nor any checker functions called. */
+
+void
+foo (const struct A *x, int y, const unsigned char *z)
+{
+ unsigned int b;
+ unsigned char *c = 0;
+
+ b = (x->i & 0xff) == 1 ? 3 : 4;
+ if (y)
+ c = bar (x->j * x->k);
+
+ const unsigned char *d = z;
+ unsigned char *e = c;
+ unsigned char *f = c + x->j * x->k;
+ int g = 0;
+
+ while (e < f)
+ {
+ unsigned int h = *d++;
+
+ if (h & 128)
+ {
+ h = h - 128;
+ g = e + h * b > f;
+ if (g)
+ h = (f - e) / b;
+ if (b < 4)
+ do
+ {
+ memcpy (e, d, 3);
+ e += 3;
+ }
+ while (--h);
+ else
+ do
+ {
+ memcpy (e, d, 4);
+ e += 4;
+ }
+ while (--h);
+ d += b;
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ h *= b;
+ g = e + h > f;
+ if (g)
+ h = f - e;
+ memcpy (e, d, h);
+ e += h;
+ d += h;
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+/* The same routine, slightly modified:
+ 1) c has known size at compile time
+ 2) e += h was changed into e += 16.
+ GCC could actually through VRP determine that
+ in e += h is (h >= 0 && h <= 127), thus know
+ it is pointer addition and not subtraction and
+ know e's __builtin_object_size (e, 0) is at 512,
+ but we are not there yet. */
+
+unsigned char *
+baz (const struct A *x, const unsigned char *z)
+{
+ unsigned int b;
+ unsigned char *c = 0;
+
+ b = (x->i & 0xff) == 1 ? 3 : 4;
+ c = malloc (512);
+
+ const unsigned char *d = z;
+ unsigned char *e = c;
+ unsigned char *f = c + x->j * x->k;
+ int g = 0;
+
+ while (e < f)
+ {
+ unsigned int h = *d++;
+
+ if (h & 128)
+ {
+ h = h - 128;
+ g = e + h * b > f;
+ if (g)
+ h = (f - e) / b;
+ if (b < 4)
+ do
+ {
+ memcpy (e, d, 3);
+ e += 3;
+ }
+ while (--h);
+ else
+ do
+ {
+ memcpy (e, d, 513); /* { dg-warning "will always overflow" "memcpy" } */
+ e += 4;
+ }
+ while (--h);
+ d += b;
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ h *= b;
+ g = e + h > f;
+ if (g)
+ h = f - e;
+ memcpy (e, d, h);
+ /* e += h; */
+ e += 16;
+ d += h;
+ }
+ }
+ return c;
+}