1 files changed, 32 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gcc-4.9/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.bugs/900205_04.C b/gcc-4.9/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.bugs/900205_04.C
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..3d8625e5c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc-4.9/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.bugs/900205_04.C
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+// { dg-do assemble  }
+// g++ 1.36.1 bug 900205_04
+
+// g++ allows a class for which an implicit default X::X() constructor must
+// be created (implicitly by the compiler) to be derived from another class
+// which does not have its own default X::X() constructor.  This is illegal.
+
+// Cfront 2.0 passes this test.
+
+// keywords: default constructor, inheritance
+
+// In ISO C++ 1998, such a derived class is not ill-formed, but if the
+// implicitly-declared constructor is used, then it is implicitly
+// defined and found to be ill-formed.
+
+struct struct0 { // { dg-message "note" }
+  int data_member;
+
+  struct0 (int, void *);	// suppresses implicit default constructor
+};
+
+struct0::struct0 (int, void *) // { dg-message "note" }
+{
+}
+
+struct struct0_derived_struct_0 : public struct0 { // { dg-error "no matching|deleted" }
+  // { dg-message "candidate" "candidate note" { target *-*-* } 26 }
+};
+
+struct0_derived_struct_0  object; // { dg-message "synthesized|deleted" }
+
+int main () { return 0; }