1 files changed, 0 insertions, 55 deletions
diff --git a/gcc-4.8/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/htm-nofloat-2.c b/gcc-4.8/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/htm-nofloat-2.c
deleted file mode 100644
index 59621a4c1..000000000
--- a/gcc-4.8/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/htm-nofloat-2.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,55 +0,0 @@
-/* { dg-do run } */
-/* { dg-options "-O3 -mhtm -Wa,-march=zEC12,-mzarch --save-temps" } */
-
-/* __builtin_tbegin has to emit clobbers for all FPRs since the tbegin
-   instruction does not automatically preserves them.  If the
-   transaction body is fully contained in a function the backend tries
-   after reload to get rid of the FPR save/restore operations
-   triggered by the clobbers.  This testcase failed since the backend
-   was able to get rid of all FPR saves/restores and since these were
-   the only stack operations also of the entire stack space.  So even
-   the save/restore of the stack pointer was omitted in the end.
-   However, since the frame layout has been fixed before, the prologue
-   still generated the stack pointer decrement making foo return with
-   a modified stack pointer.  */
-
-void abort(void);
-
-void __attribute__((noinline))
-foo (int a)
-{
-  /* This is just to prevent the tbegin code from actually being
-     executed.  That way the test may even run on machines prior to
-     zEC12.  */
-  if (a == 42)
-    return;
-
-  if (__builtin_tbegin (0) == 0)
-    __builtin_tend ();
-}
-
-#ifdef __s390x__
-#define GET_STACK_POINTER(SP)			\
-  asm volatile ("stg %%r15, %0" : "=QRST" (SP));
-#else
-#define GET_STACK_POINTER(SP)			\
-  asm volatile ("st %%r15, %0" : "=QR" (SP));
-#endif
-
-int main(void)
-{
-  unsigned long new_sp, old_sp;
-
-  GET_STACK_POINTER (old_sp);
-  foo(42);
-  GET_STACK_POINTER (new_sp);
-
-  if (old_sp != new_sp)
-    abort ();
-
-  return 0;
-}
-
-/* Make sure no FPR saves/restores are emitted.  */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "\tstd\t" } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "\tld\t" } } */