1 files changed, 53 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gcc-4.8/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.bugs/900121_02.C b/gcc-4.8/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.bugs/900121_02.C
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..15a6d27f3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc-4.8/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.bugs/900121_02.C
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+// { dg-do assemble  }
+// { dg-prune-output "note" }
+// { dg-prune-output "deleted" }
+
+// g++ 1.36.1 bug 900121_02
+
+// Assignment of structs is defined as memberwise assignment,
+// however g++ (1.36.2) and Cfront 2.0 differ on the definition
+// of assignment for unions.
+
+// (NOTE: Stroustrup now says that assignment of unions which contain either
+// members or sub-members (base classes are not allowed for unions) which
+// have non-default assignment operators defined for them will be illegal
+// in future.)
+
+// g++ (1.36.2) on the other hand, accepts this program without errors.
+
+// keywords: unions, operator=, inheritance, members
+
+struct s0 {
+
+  int i;
+
+  void operator= (s0 & arg)
+  {
+    this->i = arg.i;
+  }
+};
+
+struct s1 {
+
+  double d;
+
+  void operator= (s1 & arg)
+  {
+    this->d = arg.d;
+  }
+};
+
+union u0 {
+  s0 u0_member_0;		// { dg-error "" } 
+  s1 u0_member_1;		// { dg-error "" } 
+};
+
+void function ()
+{
+  u0 u0_object_0;
+  u0 u0_object_1;
+
+  u0_object_0 = u0_object_1;
+}
+
+int main () { return 0; }