aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/gcc-4.8.3/gcc/ada/sem_warn.adb
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc-4.8.3/gcc/ada/sem_warn.adb')
-rw-r--r--gcc-4.8.3/gcc/ada/sem_warn.adb4212
1 files changed, 4212 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gcc-4.8.3/gcc/ada/sem_warn.adb b/gcc-4.8.3/gcc/ada/sem_warn.adb
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..be4532e60
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc-4.8.3/gcc/ada/sem_warn.adb
@@ -0,0 +1,4212 @@
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+-- --
+-- GNAT COMPILER COMPONENTS --
+-- --
+-- S E M _ W A R N --
+-- --
+-- B o d y --
+-- --
+-- Copyright (C) 1999-2012, Free Software Foundation, Inc. --
+-- --
+-- GNAT is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under --
+-- terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Soft- --
+-- ware Foundation; either version 3, or (at your option) any later ver- --
+-- sion. GNAT is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITH- --
+-- OUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY --
+-- or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License --
+-- for more details. You should have received a copy of the GNU General --
+-- Public License distributed with GNAT; see file COPYING3. If not, go to --
+-- http://www.gnu.org/licenses for a complete copy of the license. --
+-- --
+-- GNAT was originally developed by the GNAT team at New York University. --
+-- Extensive contributions were provided by Ada Core Technologies Inc. --
+-- --
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+with Atree; use Atree;
+with Debug; use Debug;
+with Einfo; use Einfo;
+with Errout; use Errout;
+with Exp_Code; use Exp_Code;
+with Fname; use Fname;
+with Lib; use Lib;
+with Namet; use Namet;
+with Nlists; use Nlists;
+with Opt; use Opt;
+with Par_SCO; use Par_SCO;
+with Rtsfind; use Rtsfind;
+with Sem; use Sem;
+with Sem_Ch8; use Sem_Ch8;
+with Sem_Aux; use Sem_Aux;
+with Sem_Eval; use Sem_Eval;
+with Sem_Util; use Sem_Util;
+with Sinfo; use Sinfo;
+with Sinput; use Sinput;
+with Snames; use Snames;
+with Stand; use Stand;
+with Stringt; use Stringt;
+with Uintp; use Uintp;
+
+package body Sem_Warn is
+
+ -- The following table collects Id's of entities that are potentially
+ -- unreferenced. See Check_Unset_Reference for further details.
+ -- ??? Check_Unset_Reference has zero information about this table.
+
+ package Unreferenced_Entities is new Table.Table (
+ Table_Component_Type => Entity_Id,
+ Table_Index_Type => Nat,
+ Table_Low_Bound => 1,
+ Table_Initial => Alloc.Unreferenced_Entities_Initial,
+ Table_Increment => Alloc.Unreferenced_Entities_Increment,
+ Table_Name => "Unreferenced_Entities");
+
+ -- The following table collects potential warnings for IN OUT parameters
+ -- that are referenced but not modified. These warnings are processed when
+ -- the front end calls the procedure Output_Non_Modified_In_Out_Warnings.
+ -- The reason that we defer output of these messages is that we want to
+ -- detect the case where the relevant procedure is used as a generic actual
+ -- in an instantiation, since we suppress the warnings in this case. The
+ -- flag Used_As_Generic_Actual will be set in this case, but only at the
+ -- point of usage. Similarly, we suppress the message if the address of the
+ -- procedure is taken, where the flag Address_Taken may be set later.
+
+ package In_Out_Warnings is new Table.Table (
+ Table_Component_Type => Entity_Id,
+ Table_Index_Type => Nat,
+ Table_Low_Bound => 1,
+ Table_Initial => Alloc.In_Out_Warnings_Initial,
+ Table_Increment => Alloc.In_Out_Warnings_Increment,
+ Table_Name => "In_Out_Warnings");
+
+ --------------------------------------------------------
+ -- Handling of Warnings Off, Unmodified, Unreferenced --
+ --------------------------------------------------------
+
+ -- The functions Has_Warnings_Off, Has_Unmodified, Has_Unreferenced must
+ -- generally be used instead of Warnings_Off, Has_Pragma_Unmodified and
+ -- Has_Pragma_Unreferenced, as noted in the specs in Einfo.
+
+ -- In order to avoid losing warnings in -gnatw.w (warn on unnecessary
+ -- warnings off pragma) mode, i.e. to avoid false negatives, the code
+ -- must follow some important rules.
+
+ -- Call these functions as late as possible, after completing all other
+ -- tests, just before the warnings is given. For example, don't write:
+
+ -- if not Has_Warnings_Off (E)
+ -- and then some-other-predicate-on-E then ..
+
+ -- Instead the following is preferred
+
+ -- if some-other-predicate-on-E
+ -- and then Has_Warnings_Off (E)
+
+ -- This way if some-other-predicate is false, we avoid a false indication
+ -- that a Warnings (Off, E) pragma was useful in preventing a warning.
+
+ -- The second rule is that if both Has_Unmodified and Has_Warnings_Off, or
+ -- Has_Unreferenced and Has_Warnings_Off are called, make sure that the
+ -- call to Has_Unmodified/Has_Unreferenced comes first, this way we record
+ -- that the Warnings (Off) could have been Unreferenced or Unmodified. In
+ -- fact Has_Unmodified/Has_Unreferenced includes a test for Warnings Off,
+ -- and so a subsequent test is not needed anyway (though it is harmless).
+
+ -----------------------
+ -- Local Subprograms --
+ -----------------------
+
+ function Generic_Package_Spec_Entity (E : Entity_Id) return Boolean;
+ -- This returns true if the entity E is declared within a generic package.
+ -- The point of this is to detect variables which are not assigned within
+ -- the generic, but might be assigned outside the package for any given
+ -- instance. These are cases where we leave the warnings to be posted for
+ -- the instance, when we will know more.
+
+ function Goto_Spec_Entity (E : Entity_Id) return Entity_Id;
+ -- If E is a parameter entity for a subprogram body, then this function
+ -- returns the corresponding spec entity, if not, E is returned unchanged.
+
+ function Has_Pragma_Unmodified_Check_Spec (E : Entity_Id) return Boolean;
+ -- Tests Has_Pragma_Unmodified flag for entity E. If E is not a formal,
+ -- this is simply the setting of the flag Has_Pragma_Unmodified. If E is
+ -- a body formal, the setting of the flag in the corresponding spec is
+ -- also checked (and True returned if either flag is True).
+
+ function Has_Pragma_Unreferenced_Check_Spec (E : Entity_Id) return Boolean;
+ -- Tests Has_Pragma_Unreferenced flag for entity E. If E is not a formal,
+ -- this is simply the setting of the flag Has_Pragma_Unreferenced. If E is
+ -- a body formal, the setting of the flag in the corresponding spec is
+ -- also checked (and True returned if either flag is True).
+
+ function Never_Set_In_Source_Check_Spec (E : Entity_Id) return Boolean;
+ -- Tests Never_Set_In_Source status for entity E. If E is not a formal,
+ -- this is simply the setting of the flag Never_Set_In_Source. If E is
+ -- a body formal, the setting of the flag in the corresponding spec is
+ -- also checked (and False returned if either flag is False).
+
+ function Operand_Has_Warnings_Suppressed (N : Node_Id) return Boolean;
+ -- This function traverses the expression tree represented by the node N
+ -- and determines if any sub-operand is a reference to an entity for which
+ -- the Warnings_Off flag is set. True is returned if such an entity is
+ -- encountered, and False otherwise.
+
+ function Referenced_Check_Spec (E : Entity_Id) return Boolean;
+ -- Tests Referenced status for entity E. If E is not a formal, this is
+ -- simply the setting of the flag Referenced. If E is a body formal, the
+ -- setting of the flag in the corresponding spec is also checked (and True
+ -- returned if either flag is True).
+
+ function Referenced_As_LHS_Check_Spec (E : Entity_Id) return Boolean;
+ -- Tests Referenced_As_LHS status for entity E. If E is not a formal, this
+ -- is simply the setting of the flag Referenced_As_LHS. If E is a body
+ -- formal, the setting of the flag in the corresponding spec is also
+ -- checked (and True returned if either flag is True).
+
+ function Referenced_As_Out_Parameter_Check_Spec
+ (E : Entity_Id) return Boolean;
+ -- Tests Referenced_As_Out_Parameter status for entity E. If E is not a
+ -- formal, this is simply the setting of Referenced_As_Out_Parameter. If E
+ -- is a body formal, the setting of the flag in the corresponding spec is
+ -- also checked (and True returned if either flag is True).
+
+ procedure Warn_On_Unreferenced_Entity
+ (Spec_E : Entity_Id;
+ Body_E : Entity_Id := Empty);
+ -- Output warnings for unreferenced entity E. For the case of an entry
+ -- formal, Body_E is the corresponding body entity for a particular
+ -- accept statement, and the message is posted on Body_E. In all other
+ -- cases, Body_E is ignored and must be Empty.
+
+ function Warnings_Off_Check_Spec (E : Entity_Id) return Boolean;
+ -- Returns True if Warnings_Off is set for the entity E or (in the case
+ -- where there is a Spec_Entity), Warnings_Off is set for the Spec_Entity.
+
+ --------------------------
+ -- Check_Code_Statement --
+ --------------------------
+
+ procedure Check_Code_Statement (N : Node_Id) is
+ begin
+ -- If volatile, nothing to worry about
+
+ if Is_Asm_Volatile (N) then
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ -- Warn if no input or no output
+
+ Setup_Asm_Inputs (N);
+
+ if No (Asm_Input_Value) then
+ Error_Msg_F
+ ("??code statement with no inputs should usually be Volatile!", N);
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ Setup_Asm_Outputs (N);
+
+ if No (Asm_Output_Variable) then
+ Error_Msg_F
+ ("??code statement with no outputs should usually be Volatile!", N);
+ return;
+ end if;
+ end Check_Code_Statement;
+
+ ---------------------------------
+ -- Check_Infinite_Loop_Warning --
+ ---------------------------------
+
+ -- The case we look for is a while loop which tests a local variable, where
+ -- there is no obvious direct or possible indirect update of the variable
+ -- within the body of the loop.
+
+ procedure Check_Infinite_Loop_Warning (Loop_Statement : Node_Id) is
+ Expression : Node_Id := Empty;
+ -- Set to WHILE or EXIT WHEN condition to be tested
+
+ Ref : Node_Id := Empty;
+ -- Reference in Expression to variable that might not be modified
+ -- in loop, indicating a possible infinite loop.
+
+ Var : Entity_Id := Empty;
+ -- Corresponding entity (entity of Ref)
+
+ Function_Call_Found : Boolean := False;
+ -- True if Find_Var found a function call in the condition
+
+ procedure Find_Var (N : Node_Id);
+ -- Inspect condition to see if it depends on a single entity reference.
+ -- If so, Ref is set to point to the reference node, and Var is set to
+ -- the referenced Entity.
+
+ function Has_Indirection (T : Entity_Id) return Boolean;
+ -- If the controlling variable is an access type, or is a record type
+ -- with access components, assume that it is changed indirectly and
+ -- suppress the warning. As a concession to low-level programming, in
+ -- particular within Declib, we also suppress warnings on a record
+ -- type that contains components of type Address or Short_Address.
+
+ function Is_Suspicious_Function_Name (E : Entity_Id) return Boolean;
+ -- Given an entity name, see if the name appears to have something to
+ -- do with I/O or network stuff, and if so, return True. Used to kill
+ -- some false positives on a heuristic basis that such functions will
+ -- likely have some strange side effect dependencies. A rather funny
+ -- kludge, but warning messages are in the heuristics business.
+
+ function Test_Ref (N : Node_Id) return Traverse_Result;
+ -- Test for reference to variable in question. Returns Abandon if
+ -- matching reference found. Used in instantiation of No_Ref_Found.
+
+ function No_Ref_Found is new Traverse_Func (Test_Ref);
+ -- Function to traverse body of procedure. Returns Abandon if matching
+ -- reference found.
+
+ --------------
+ -- Find_Var --
+ --------------
+
+ procedure Find_Var (N : Node_Id) is
+ begin
+ -- Condition is a direct variable reference
+
+ if Is_Entity_Name (N) then
+ Ref := N;
+ Var := Entity (Ref);
+
+ -- Case of condition is a comparison with compile time known value
+
+ elsif Nkind (N) in N_Op_Compare then
+ if Compile_Time_Known_Value (Right_Opnd (N)) then
+ Find_Var (Left_Opnd (N));
+
+ elsif Compile_Time_Known_Value (Left_Opnd (N)) then
+ Find_Var (Right_Opnd (N));
+
+ -- Ignore any other comparison
+
+ else
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ -- If condition is a negation, check its operand
+
+ elsif Nkind (N) = N_Op_Not then
+ Find_Var (Right_Opnd (N));
+
+ -- Case of condition is function call
+
+ elsif Nkind (N) = N_Function_Call then
+
+ Function_Call_Found := True;
+
+ -- Forget it if function name is not entity, who knows what
+ -- we might be calling?
+
+ if not Is_Entity_Name (Name (N)) then
+ return;
+
+ -- Forget it if function name is suspicious. A strange test
+ -- but warning generation is in the heuristics business!
+
+ elsif Is_Suspicious_Function_Name (Entity (Name (N))) then
+ return;
+
+ -- Forget it if warnings are suppressed on function entity
+
+ elsif Has_Warnings_Off (Entity (Name (N))) then
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ -- OK, see if we have one argument
+
+ declare
+ PA : constant List_Id := Parameter_Associations (N);
+
+ begin
+ -- One argument, so check the argument
+
+ if Present (PA)
+ and then List_Length (PA) = 1
+ then
+ if Nkind (First (PA)) = N_Parameter_Association then
+ Find_Var (Explicit_Actual_Parameter (First (PA)));
+ else
+ Find_Var (First (PA));
+ end if;
+
+ -- Not one argument
+
+ else
+ return;
+ end if;
+ end;
+
+ -- Any other kind of node is not something we warn for
+
+ else
+ return;
+ end if;
+ end Find_Var;
+
+ ---------------------
+ -- Has_Indirection --
+ ---------------------
+
+ function Has_Indirection (T : Entity_Id) return Boolean is
+ Comp : Entity_Id;
+ Rec : Entity_Id;
+
+ begin
+ if Is_Access_Type (T) then
+ return True;
+
+ elsif Is_Private_Type (T)
+ and then Present (Full_View (T))
+ and then Is_Access_Type (Full_View (T))
+ then
+ return True;
+
+ elsif Is_Record_Type (T) then
+ Rec := T;
+
+ elsif Is_Private_Type (T)
+ and then Present (Full_View (T))
+ and then Is_Record_Type (Full_View (T))
+ then
+ Rec := Full_View (T);
+ else
+ return False;
+ end if;
+
+ Comp := First_Component (Rec);
+ while Present (Comp) loop
+ if Is_Access_Type (Etype (Comp))
+ or else Is_Descendent_Of_Address (Etype (Comp))
+ then
+ return True;
+ end if;
+
+ Next_Component (Comp);
+ end loop;
+
+ return False;
+ end Has_Indirection;
+
+ ---------------------------------
+ -- Is_Suspicious_Function_Name --
+ ---------------------------------
+
+ function Is_Suspicious_Function_Name (E : Entity_Id) return Boolean is
+ S : Entity_Id;
+
+ function Substring_Present (S : String) return Boolean;
+ -- Returns True if name buffer has given string delimited by non-
+ -- alphabetic characters or by end of string. S is lower case.
+
+ -----------------------
+ -- Substring_Present --
+ -----------------------
+
+ function Substring_Present (S : String) return Boolean is
+ Len : constant Natural := S'Length;
+
+ begin
+ for J in 1 .. Name_Len - (Len - 1) loop
+ if Name_Buffer (J .. J + (Len - 1)) = S
+ and then
+ (J = 1
+ or else Name_Buffer (J - 1) not in 'a' .. 'z')
+ and then
+ (J + Len > Name_Len
+ or else Name_Buffer (J + Len) not in 'a' .. 'z')
+ then
+ return True;
+ end if;
+ end loop;
+
+ return False;
+ end Substring_Present;
+
+ -- Start of processing for Is_Suspicious_Function_Name
+
+ begin
+ S := E;
+ while Present (S) and then S /= Standard_Standard loop
+ Get_Name_String (Chars (S));
+
+ if Substring_Present ("io")
+ or else Substring_Present ("file")
+ or else Substring_Present ("network")
+ then
+ return True;
+ else
+ S := Scope (S);
+ end if;
+ end loop;
+
+ return False;
+ end Is_Suspicious_Function_Name;
+
+ --------------
+ -- Test_Ref --
+ --------------
+
+ function Test_Ref (N : Node_Id) return Traverse_Result is
+ begin
+ -- Waste of time to look at the expression we are testing
+
+ if N = Expression then
+ return Skip;
+
+ -- Direct reference to variable in question
+
+ elsif Is_Entity_Name (N)
+ and then Present (Entity (N))
+ and then Entity (N) = Var
+ then
+ -- If this is an lvalue, then definitely abandon, since
+ -- this could be a direct modification of the variable.
+
+ if May_Be_Lvalue (N) then
+ return Abandon;
+ end if;
+
+ -- If the condition contains a function call, we consider it may
+ -- be modified by side-effects from a procedure call. Otherwise,
+ -- we consider the condition may not be modified, although that
+ -- might happen if Variable is itself a by-reference parameter,
+ -- and the procedure called modifies the global object referred to
+ -- by Variable, but we actually prefer to issue a warning in this
+ -- odd case. Note that the case where the procedure called has
+ -- visibility over Variable is treated in another case below.
+
+ if Function_Call_Found then
+ declare
+ P : Node_Id;
+
+ begin
+ P := N;
+ loop
+ P := Parent (P);
+ exit when P = Loop_Statement;
+
+ -- Abandon if at procedure call, or something strange is
+ -- going on (perhaps a node with no parent that should
+ -- have one but does not?) As always, for a warning we
+ -- prefer to just abandon the warning than get into the
+ -- business of complaining about the tree structure here!
+
+ if No (P)
+ or else Nkind (P) = N_Procedure_Call_Statement
+ then
+ return Abandon;
+ end if;
+ end loop;
+ end;
+ end if;
+
+ -- Reference to variable renaming variable in question
+
+ elsif Is_Entity_Name (N)
+ and then Present (Entity (N))
+ and then Ekind (Entity (N)) = E_Variable
+ and then Present (Renamed_Object (Entity (N)))
+ and then Is_Entity_Name (Renamed_Object (Entity (N)))
+ and then Entity (Renamed_Object (Entity (N))) = Var
+ and then May_Be_Lvalue (N)
+ then
+ return Abandon;
+
+ -- Call to subprogram
+
+ elsif Nkind (N) in N_Subprogram_Call then
+
+ -- If subprogram is within the scope of the entity we are dealing
+ -- with as the loop variable, then it could modify this parameter,
+ -- so we abandon in this case. In the case of a subprogram that is
+ -- not an entity we also abandon. The check for no entity being
+ -- present is a defense against previous errors.
+
+ if not Is_Entity_Name (Name (N))
+ or else No (Entity (Name (N)))
+ or else Scope_Within (Entity (Name (N)), Scope (Var))
+ then
+ return Abandon;
+ end if;
+
+ -- If any of the arguments are of type access to subprogram, then
+ -- we may have funny side effects, so no warning in this case.
+
+ declare
+ Actual : Node_Id;
+ begin
+ Actual := First_Actual (N);
+ while Present (Actual) loop
+ if Is_Access_Subprogram_Type (Etype (Actual)) then
+ return Abandon;
+ else
+ Next_Actual (Actual);
+ end if;
+ end loop;
+ end;
+
+ -- Declaration of the variable in question
+
+ elsif Nkind (N) = N_Object_Declaration
+ and then Defining_Identifier (N) = Var
+ then
+ return Abandon;
+ end if;
+
+ -- All OK, continue scan
+
+ return OK;
+ end Test_Ref;
+
+ -- Start of processing for Check_Infinite_Loop_Warning
+
+ begin
+ -- Skip processing if debug flag gnatd.w is set
+
+ if Debug_Flag_Dot_W then
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ -- Deal with Iteration scheme present
+
+ declare
+ Iter : constant Node_Id := Iteration_Scheme (Loop_Statement);
+
+ begin
+ if Present (Iter) then
+
+ -- While iteration
+
+ if Present (Condition (Iter)) then
+
+ -- Skip processing for while iteration with conditions actions,
+ -- since they make it too complicated to get the warning right.
+
+ if Present (Condition_Actions (Iter)) then
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ -- Capture WHILE condition
+
+ Expression := Condition (Iter);
+
+ -- For iteration, do not process, since loop will always terminate
+
+ elsif Present (Loop_Parameter_Specification (Iter)) then
+ return;
+ end if;
+ end if;
+ end;
+
+ -- Check chain of EXIT statements, we only process loops that have a
+ -- single exit condition (either a single EXIT WHEN statement, or a
+ -- WHILE loop not containing any EXIT WHEN statements).
+
+ declare
+ Ident : constant Node_Id := Identifier (Loop_Statement);
+ Exit_Stmt : Node_Id;
+
+ begin
+ -- If we don't have a proper chain set, ignore call entirely. This
+ -- happens because of previous errors.
+
+ if No (Entity (Ident))
+ or else Ekind (Entity (Ident)) /= E_Loop
+ then
+ Check_Error_Detected;
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ -- Otherwise prepare to scan list of EXIT statements
+
+ Exit_Stmt := First_Exit_Statement (Entity (Ident));
+ while Present (Exit_Stmt) loop
+
+ -- Check for EXIT WHEN
+
+ if Present (Condition (Exit_Stmt)) then
+
+ -- Quit processing if EXIT WHEN in WHILE loop, or more than
+ -- one EXIT WHEN statement present in the loop.
+
+ if Present (Expression) then
+ return;
+
+ -- Otherwise capture condition from EXIT WHEN statement
+
+ else
+ Expression := Condition (Exit_Stmt);
+ end if;
+ end if;
+
+ Exit_Stmt := Next_Exit_Statement (Exit_Stmt);
+ end loop;
+ end;
+
+ -- Return if no condition to test
+
+ if No (Expression) then
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ -- Initial conditions met, see if condition is of right form
+
+ Find_Var (Expression);
+
+ -- Nothing to do if local variable from source not found. If it's a
+ -- renaming, it is probably renaming something too complicated to deal
+ -- with here.
+
+ if No (Var)
+ or else Ekind (Var) /= E_Variable
+ or else Is_Library_Level_Entity (Var)
+ or else not Comes_From_Source (Var)
+ or else Nkind (Parent (Var)) = N_Object_Renaming_Declaration
+ then
+ return;
+
+ -- Nothing to do if there is some indirection involved (assume that the
+ -- designated variable might be modified in some way we don't see).
+ -- However, if no function call was found, then we don't care about
+ -- indirections, because the condition must be something like "while X
+ -- /= null loop", so we don't care if X.all is modified in the loop.
+
+ elsif Function_Call_Found and then Has_Indirection (Etype (Var)) then
+ return;
+
+ -- Same sort of thing for volatile variable, might be modified by
+ -- some other task or by the operating system in some way.
+
+ elsif Is_Volatile (Var) then
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ -- Filter out case of original statement sequence starting with delay.
+ -- We assume this is a multi-tasking program and that the condition
+ -- is affected by other threads (some kind of busy wait).
+
+ declare
+ Fstm : constant Node_Id :=
+ Original_Node (First (Statements (Loop_Statement)));
+ begin
+ if Nkind (Fstm) = N_Delay_Relative_Statement
+ or else Nkind (Fstm) = N_Delay_Until_Statement
+ then
+ return;
+ end if;
+ end;
+
+ -- We have a variable reference of the right form, now we scan the loop
+ -- body to see if it looks like it might not be modified
+
+ if No_Ref_Found (Loop_Statement) = OK then
+ Error_Msg_NE
+ ("??variable& is not modified in loop body!", Ref, Var);
+ Error_Msg_N
+ ("\??possible infinite loop!", Ref);
+ end if;
+ end Check_Infinite_Loop_Warning;
+
+ ----------------------------
+ -- Check_Low_Bound_Tested --
+ ----------------------------
+
+ procedure Check_Low_Bound_Tested (Expr : Node_Id) is
+ begin
+ if Comes_From_Source (Expr) then
+ declare
+ L : constant Node_Id := Left_Opnd (Expr);
+ R : constant Node_Id := Right_Opnd (Expr);
+ begin
+ if Nkind (L) = N_Attribute_Reference
+ and then Attribute_Name (L) = Name_First
+ and then Is_Entity_Name (Prefix (L))
+ and then Is_Formal (Entity (Prefix (L)))
+ then
+ Set_Low_Bound_Tested (Entity (Prefix (L)));
+ end if;
+
+ if Nkind (R) = N_Attribute_Reference
+ and then Attribute_Name (R) = Name_First
+ and then Is_Entity_Name (Prefix (R))
+ and then Is_Formal (Entity (Prefix (R)))
+ then
+ Set_Low_Bound_Tested (Entity (Prefix (R)));
+ end if;
+ end;
+ end if;
+ end Check_Low_Bound_Tested;
+
+ ----------------------
+ -- Check_References --
+ ----------------------
+
+ procedure Check_References (E : Entity_Id; Anod : Node_Id := Empty) is
+ E1 : Entity_Id;
+ E1T : Entity_Id;
+ UR : Node_Id;
+
+ function Body_Formal
+ (E : Entity_Id;
+ Accept_Statement : Node_Id) return Entity_Id;
+ -- For an entry formal entity from an entry declaration, find the
+ -- corresponding body formal from the given accept statement.
+
+ function Missing_Subunits return Boolean;
+ -- We suppress warnings when there are missing subunits, because this
+ -- may generate too many false positives: entities in a parent may only
+ -- be referenced in one of the subunits. We make an exception for
+ -- subunits that contain no other stubs.
+
+ procedure Output_Reference_Error (M : String);
+ -- Used to output an error message. Deals with posting the error on the
+ -- body formal in the accept case.
+
+ function Publicly_Referenceable (Ent : Entity_Id) return Boolean;
+ -- This is true if the entity in question is potentially referenceable
+ -- from another unit. This is true for entities in packages that are at
+ -- the library level.
+
+ function Warnings_Off_E1 return Boolean;
+ -- Return True if Warnings_Off is set for E1, or for its Etype (E1T),
+ -- or for the base type of E1T.
+
+ -----------------
+ -- Body_Formal --
+ -----------------
+
+ function Body_Formal
+ (E : Entity_Id;
+ Accept_Statement : Node_Id) return Entity_Id
+ is
+ Body_Param : Node_Id;
+ Body_E : Entity_Id;
+
+ begin
+ -- Loop to find matching parameter in accept statement
+
+ Body_Param := First (Parameter_Specifications (Accept_Statement));
+ while Present (Body_Param) loop
+ Body_E := Defining_Identifier (Body_Param);
+
+ if Chars (Body_E) = Chars (E) then
+ return Body_E;
+ end if;
+
+ Next (Body_Param);
+ end loop;
+
+ -- Should never fall through, should always find a match
+
+ raise Program_Error;
+ end Body_Formal;
+
+ ----------------------
+ -- Missing_Subunits --
+ ----------------------
+
+ function Missing_Subunits return Boolean is
+ D : Node_Id;
+
+ begin
+ if not Unloaded_Subunits then
+
+ -- Normal compilation, all subunits are present
+
+ return False;
+
+ elsif E /= Main_Unit_Entity then
+
+ -- No warnings on a stub that is not the main unit
+
+ return True;
+
+ elsif Nkind (Unit_Declaration_Node (E)) in N_Proper_Body then
+ D := First (Declarations (Unit_Declaration_Node (E)));
+ while Present (D) loop
+
+ -- No warnings if the proper body contains nested stubs
+
+ if Nkind (D) in N_Body_Stub then
+ return True;
+ end if;
+
+ Next (D);
+ end loop;
+
+ return False;
+
+ else
+ -- Missing stubs elsewhere
+
+ return True;
+ end if;
+ end Missing_Subunits;
+
+ ----------------------------
+ -- Output_Reference_Error --
+ ----------------------------
+
+ procedure Output_Reference_Error (M : String) is
+ begin
+ -- Never issue messages for internal names, nor for renamings
+
+ if Is_Internal_Name (Chars (E1))
+ or else Nkind (Parent (E1)) = N_Object_Renaming_Declaration
+ then
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ -- Don't output message for IN OUT formal unless we have the warning
+ -- flag specifically set. It is a bit odd to distinguish IN OUT
+ -- formals from other cases. This distinction is historical in
+ -- nature. Warnings for IN OUT formals were added fairly late.
+
+ if Ekind (E1) = E_In_Out_Parameter
+ and then not Check_Unreferenced_Formals
+ then
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ -- Other than accept case, post error on defining identifier
+
+ if No (Anod) then
+ Error_Msg_N (M, E1);
+
+ -- Accept case, find body formal to post the message
+
+ else
+ Error_Msg_NE (M, Body_Formal (E1, Accept_Statement => Anod), E1);
+
+ end if;
+ end Output_Reference_Error;
+
+ ----------------------------
+ -- Publicly_Referenceable --
+ ----------------------------
+
+ function Publicly_Referenceable (Ent : Entity_Id) return Boolean is
+ P : Node_Id;
+ Prev : Node_Id;
+
+ begin
+ -- A formal parameter is never referenceable outside the body of its
+ -- subprogram or entry.
+
+ if Is_Formal (Ent) then
+ return False;
+ end if;
+
+ -- Examine parents to look for a library level package spec. But if
+ -- we find a body or block or other similar construct along the way,
+ -- we cannot be referenced.
+
+ Prev := Ent;
+ P := Parent (Ent);
+ loop
+ case Nkind (P) is
+
+ -- If we get to top of tree, then publicly referenceable
+
+ when N_Empty =>
+ return True;
+
+ -- If we reach a generic package declaration, then always
+ -- consider this referenceable, since any instantiation will
+ -- have access to the entities in the generic package. Note
+ -- that the package itself may not be instantiated, but then
+ -- we will get a warning for the package entity.
+
+ -- Note that generic formal parameters are themselves not
+ -- publicly referenceable in an instance, and warnings on them
+ -- are useful.
+
+ when N_Generic_Package_Declaration =>
+ return
+ not Is_List_Member (Prev)
+ or else List_Containing (Prev)
+ /= Generic_Formal_Declarations (P);
+
+ -- Similarly, the generic formals of a generic subprogram are
+ -- not accessible.
+
+ when N_Generic_Subprogram_Declaration =>
+ if Is_List_Member (Prev)
+ and then List_Containing (Prev) =
+ Generic_Formal_Declarations (P)
+ then
+ return False;
+ else
+ P := Parent (P);
+ end if;
+
+ -- If we reach a subprogram body, entity is not referenceable
+ -- unless it is the defining entity of the body. This will
+ -- happen, e.g. when a function is an attribute renaming that
+ -- is rewritten as a body.
+
+ when N_Subprogram_Body =>
+ if Ent /= Defining_Entity (P) then
+ return False;
+ else
+ P := Parent (P);
+ end if;
+
+ -- If we reach any other body, definitely not referenceable
+
+ when N_Package_Body |
+ N_Task_Body |
+ N_Entry_Body |
+ N_Protected_Body |
+ N_Block_Statement |
+ N_Subunit =>
+ return False;
+
+ -- For all other cases, keep looking up tree
+
+ when others =>
+ Prev := P;
+ P := Parent (P);
+ end case;
+ end loop;
+ end Publicly_Referenceable;
+
+ ---------------------
+ -- Warnings_Off_E1 --
+ ---------------------
+
+ function Warnings_Off_E1 return Boolean is
+ begin
+ return Has_Warnings_Off (E1T)
+ or else Has_Warnings_Off (Base_Type (E1T))
+ or else Warnings_Off_Check_Spec (E1);
+ end Warnings_Off_E1;
+
+ -- Start of processing for Check_References
+
+ begin
+ -- No messages if warnings are suppressed, or if we have detected any
+ -- real errors so far (this last check avoids junk messages resulting
+ -- from errors, e.g. a subunit that is not loaded).
+
+ if Warning_Mode = Suppress
+ or else Serious_Errors_Detected /= 0
+ then
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ -- We also skip the messages if any subunits were not loaded (see
+ -- comment in Sem_Ch10 to understand how this is set, and why it is
+ -- necessary to suppress the warnings in this case).
+
+ if Missing_Subunits then
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ -- Otherwise loop through entities, looking for suspicious stuff
+
+ E1 := First_Entity (E);
+ while Present (E1) loop
+ E1T := Etype (E1);
+
+ -- We are only interested in source entities. We also don't issue
+ -- warnings within instances, since the proper place for such
+ -- warnings is on the template when it is compiled.
+
+ if Comes_From_Source (E1)
+ and then Instantiation_Location (Sloc (E1)) = No_Location
+ then
+ -- We are interested in variables and out/in-out parameters, but
+ -- we exclude protected types, too complicated to worry about.
+
+ if Ekind (E1) = E_Variable
+ or else
+ (Ekind_In (E1, E_Out_Parameter, E_In_Out_Parameter)
+ and then not Is_Protected_Type (Current_Scope))
+ then
+ -- Case of an unassigned variable
+
+ -- First gather any Unset_Reference indication for E1. In the
+ -- case of a parameter, it is the Spec_Entity that is relevant.
+
+ if Ekind (E1) = E_Out_Parameter
+ and then Present (Spec_Entity (E1))
+ then
+ UR := Unset_Reference (Spec_Entity (E1));
+ else
+ UR := Unset_Reference (E1);
+ end if;
+
+ -- Special processing for access types
+
+ if Present (UR)
+ and then Is_Access_Type (E1T)
+ then
+ -- For access types, the only time we made a UR entry was
+ -- for a dereference, and so we post the appropriate warning
+ -- here (note that the dereference may not be explicit in
+ -- the source, for example in the case of a dispatching call
+ -- with an anonymous access controlling formal, or of an
+ -- assignment of a pointer involving discriminant check on
+ -- the designated object).
+
+ if not Warnings_Off_E1 then
+ Error_Msg_NE ("??& may be null!", UR, E1);
+ end if;
+
+ goto Continue;
+
+ -- Case of variable that could be a constant. Note that we
+ -- never signal such messages for generic package entities,
+ -- since a given instance could have modifications outside
+ -- the package.
+
+ elsif Warn_On_Constant
+ and then (Ekind (E1) = E_Variable
+ and then Has_Initial_Value (E1))
+ and then Never_Set_In_Source_Check_Spec (E1)
+ and then not Address_Taken (E1)
+ and then not Generic_Package_Spec_Entity (E1)
+ then
+ -- A special case, if this variable is volatile and not
+ -- imported, it is not helpful to tell the programmer
+ -- to mark the variable as constant, since this would be
+ -- illegal by virtue of RM C.6(13).
+
+ if (Is_Volatile (E1) or else Has_Volatile_Components (E1))
+ and then not Is_Imported (E1)
+ then
+ Error_Msg_N
+ ("?k?& is not modified, volatile has no effect!", E1);
+
+ -- Another special case, Exception_Occurrence, this catches
+ -- the case of exception choice (and a bit more too, but not
+ -- worth doing more investigation here).
+
+ elsif Is_RTE (E1T, RE_Exception_Occurrence) then
+ null;
+
+ -- Here we give the warning if referenced and no pragma
+ -- Unreferenced or Unmodified is present.
+
+ else
+ -- Variable case
+
+ if Ekind (E1) = E_Variable then
+ if Referenced_Check_Spec (E1)
+ and then not Has_Pragma_Unreferenced_Check_Spec (E1)
+ and then not Has_Pragma_Unmodified_Check_Spec (E1)
+ then
+ if not Warnings_Off_E1 then
+ Error_Msg_N -- CODEFIX
+ ("?k?& is not modified, "
+ & "could be declared constant!",
+ E1);
+ end if;
+ end if;
+ end if;
+ end if;
+
+ -- Other cases of a variable or parameter never set in source
+
+ elsif Never_Set_In_Source_Check_Spec (E1)
+
+ -- No warning if warning for this case turned off
+
+ and then Warn_On_No_Value_Assigned
+
+ -- No warning if address taken somewhere
+
+ and then not Address_Taken (E1)
+
+ -- No warning if explicit initial value
+
+ and then not Has_Initial_Value (E1)
+
+ -- No warning for generic package spec entities, since we
+ -- might set them in a child unit or something like that
+
+ and then not Generic_Package_Spec_Entity (E1)
+
+ -- No warning if fully initialized type, except that for
+ -- this purpose we do not consider access types to qualify
+ -- as fully initialized types (relying on an access type
+ -- variable being null when it is never set is a bit odd!)
+
+ -- Also we generate warning for an out parameter that is
+ -- never referenced, since again it seems odd to rely on
+ -- default initialization to set an out parameter value.
+
+ and then (Is_Access_Type (E1T)
+ or else Ekind (E1) = E_Out_Parameter
+ or else not Is_Fully_Initialized_Type (E1T))
+ then
+ -- Do not output complaint about never being assigned a
+ -- value if a pragma Unmodified applies to the variable
+ -- we are examining, or if it is a parameter, if there is
+ -- a pragma Unreferenced for the corresponding spec, or
+ -- if the type is marked as having unreferenced objects.
+ -- The last is a little peculiar, but better too few than
+ -- too many warnings in this situation.
+
+ if Has_Pragma_Unreferenced_Objects (E1T)
+ or else Has_Pragma_Unmodified_Check_Spec (E1)
+ then
+ null;
+
+ -- IN OUT parameter case where parameter is referenced. We
+ -- separate this out, since this is the case where we delay
+ -- output of the warning until more information is available
+ -- (about use in an instantiation or address being taken).
+
+ elsif Ekind (E1) = E_In_Out_Parameter
+ and then Referenced_Check_Spec (E1)
+ then
+ -- Suppress warning if private type, and the procedure
+ -- has a separate declaration in a different unit. This
+ -- is the case where the client of a package sees only
+ -- the private type, and it may be quite reasonable
+ -- for the logical view to be IN OUT, even if the
+ -- implementation ends up using access types or some
+ -- other method to achieve the local effect of a
+ -- modification. On the other hand if the spec and body
+ -- are in the same unit, we are in the package body and
+ -- there we have less excuse for a junk IN OUT parameter.
+
+ if Has_Private_Declaration (E1T)
+ and then Present (Spec_Entity (E1))
+ and then not In_Same_Source_Unit (E1, Spec_Entity (E1))
+ then
+ null;
+
+ -- Suppress warning for any parameter of a dispatching
+ -- operation, since it is quite reasonable to have an
+ -- operation that is overridden, and for some subclasses
+ -- needs the formal to be IN OUT and for others happens
+ -- not to assign it.
+
+ elsif Is_Dispatching_Operation
+ (Scope (Goto_Spec_Entity (E1)))
+ then
+ null;
+
+ -- Suppress warning if composite type contains any access
+ -- component, since the logical effect of modifying a
+ -- parameter may be achieved by modifying a referenced
+ -- object.
+
+ elsif Is_Composite_Type (E1T)
+ and then Has_Access_Values (E1T)
+ then
+ null;
+
+ -- Suppress warning on formals of an entry body. All
+ -- references are attached to the formal in the entry
+ -- declaration, which are marked Is_Entry_Formal.
+
+ elsif Ekind (Scope (E1)) = E_Entry
+ and then not Is_Entry_Formal (E1)
+ then
+ null;
+
+ -- OK, looks like warning for an IN OUT parameter that
+ -- could be IN makes sense, but we delay the output of
+ -- the warning, pending possibly finding out later on
+ -- that the associated subprogram is used as a generic
+ -- actual, or its address/access is taken. In these two
+ -- cases, we suppress the warning because the context may
+ -- force use of IN OUT, even if in this particular case
+ -- the formal is not modified.
+
+ else
+ In_Out_Warnings.Append (E1);
+ end if;
+
+ -- Other cases of formals
+
+ elsif Is_Formal (E1) then
+ if not Is_Trivial_Subprogram (Scope (E1)) then
+ if Referenced_Check_Spec (E1) then
+ if not Has_Pragma_Unmodified_Check_Spec (E1)
+ and then not Warnings_Off_E1
+ then
+ Output_Reference_Error
+ ("?f?formal parameter& is read but "
+ & "never assigned!");
+ end if;
+
+ elsif not Has_Pragma_Unreferenced_Check_Spec (E1)
+ and then not Warnings_Off_E1
+ then
+ Output_Reference_Error
+ ("?f?formal parameter& is not referenced!");
+ end if;
+ end if;
+
+ -- Case of variable
+
+ else
+ if Referenced (E1) then
+ if not Has_Unmodified (E1)
+ and then not Warnings_Off_E1
+ then
+ Output_Reference_Error
+ ("?v?variable& is read but never assigned!");
+ end if;
+
+ elsif not Has_Unreferenced (E1)
+ and then not Warnings_Off_E1
+ then
+ Output_Reference_Error -- CODEFIX
+ ("?v?variable& is never read and never assigned!");
+ end if;
+
+ -- Deal with special case where this variable is hidden
+ -- by a loop variable.
+
+ if Ekind (E1) = E_Variable
+ and then Present (Hiding_Loop_Variable (E1))
+ and then not Warnings_Off_E1
+ then
+ Error_Msg_N
+ ("?v?for loop implicitly declares loop variable!",
+ Hiding_Loop_Variable (E1));
+
+ Error_Msg_Sloc := Sloc (E1);
+ Error_Msg_N
+ ("\?v?declaration hides & declared#!",
+ Hiding_Loop_Variable (E1));
+ end if;
+ end if;
+
+ goto Continue;
+ end if;
+
+ -- Check for unset reference
+
+ if Warn_On_No_Value_Assigned and then Present (UR) then
+
+ -- For other than access type, go back to original node to
+ -- deal with case where original unset reference has been
+ -- rewritten during expansion.
+
+ -- In some cases, the original node may be a type conversion
+ -- or qualification, and in this case we want the object
+ -- entity inside.
+
+ UR := Original_Node (UR);
+ while Nkind (UR) = N_Type_Conversion
+ or else Nkind (UR) = N_Qualified_Expression
+ loop
+ UR := Expression (UR);
+ end loop;
+
+ -- Here we issue the warning, all checks completed
+
+ -- If we have a return statement, this was a case of an OUT
+ -- parameter not being set at the time of the return. (Note:
+ -- it can't be N_Extended_Return_Statement, because those
+ -- are only for functions, and functions do not allow OUT
+ -- parameters.)
+
+ if not Is_Trivial_Subprogram (Scope (E1)) then
+ if Nkind (UR) = N_Simple_Return_Statement
+ and then not Has_Pragma_Unmodified_Check_Spec (E1)
+ then
+ if not Warnings_Off_E1 then
+ Error_Msg_NE
+ ("?v?OUT parameter& not set before return",
+ UR, E1);
+ end if;
+
+ -- If the unset reference is a selected component
+ -- prefix from source, mention the component as well.
+ -- If the selected component comes from expansion, all
+ -- we know is that the entity is not fully initialized
+ -- at the point of the reference. Locate a random
+ -- uninitialized component to get a better message.
+
+ elsif Nkind (Parent (UR)) = N_Selected_Component then
+ Error_Msg_Node_2 := Selector_Name (Parent (UR));
+
+ if not Comes_From_Source (Parent (UR)) then
+ declare
+ Comp : Entity_Id;
+
+ begin
+ Comp := First_Entity (E1T);
+ while Present (Comp) loop
+ if Ekind (Comp) = E_Component
+ and then Nkind (Parent (Comp)) =
+ N_Component_Declaration
+ and then No (Expression (Parent (Comp)))
+ then
+ Error_Msg_Node_2 := Comp;
+ exit;
+ end if;
+
+ Next_Entity (Comp);
+ end loop;
+ end;
+ end if;
+
+ -- Issue proper warning. This is a case of referencing
+ -- a variable before it has been explicitly assigned.
+ -- For access types, UR was only set for dereferences,
+ -- so the issue is that the value may be null.
+
+ if not Is_Trivial_Subprogram (Scope (E1)) then
+ if not Warnings_Off_E1 then
+ if Is_Access_Type (Etype (Parent (UR))) then
+ Error_Msg_N ("?`&.&` may be null!", UR);
+ else
+ Error_Msg_N
+ ("?`&.&` may be referenced before "
+ & "it has a value!", UR);
+ end if;
+ end if;
+ end if;
+
+ -- All other cases of unset reference active
+
+ elsif not Warnings_Off_E1 then
+ Error_Msg_N
+ ("?& may be referenced before it has a value!",
+ UR);
+ end if;
+ end if;
+
+ goto Continue;
+ end if;
+ end if;
+
+ -- Then check for unreferenced entities. Note that we are only
+ -- interested in entities whose Referenced flag is not set.
+
+ if not Referenced_Check_Spec (E1)
+
+ -- If Referenced_As_LHS is set, then that's still interesting
+ -- (potential "assigned but never read" case), but not if we
+ -- have pragma Unreferenced, which cancels this warning.
+
+ and then (not Referenced_As_LHS_Check_Spec (E1)
+ or else not Has_Unreferenced (E1))
+
+ -- Check that warnings on unreferenced entities are enabled
+
+ and then
+ ((Check_Unreferenced and then not Is_Formal (E1))
+
+ -- Case of warning on unreferenced formal
+
+ or else
+ (Check_Unreferenced_Formals and then Is_Formal (E1))
+
+ -- Case of warning on unread variables modified by an
+ -- assignment, or an OUT parameter if it is the only one.
+
+ or else
+ (Warn_On_Modified_Unread
+ and then Referenced_As_LHS_Check_Spec (E1))
+
+ -- Case of warning on any unread OUT parameter (note
+ -- such indications are only set if the appropriate
+ -- warning options were set, so no need to recheck here.)
+
+ or else
+ Referenced_As_Out_Parameter_Check_Spec (E1))
+
+ -- All other entities, including local packages that cannot be
+ -- referenced from elsewhere, including those declared within a
+ -- package body.
+
+ and then (Is_Object (E1)
+ or else
+ Is_Type (E1)
+ or else
+ Ekind (E1) = E_Label
+ or else
+ Ekind (E1) = E_Exception
+ or else
+ Ekind (E1) = E_Named_Integer
+ or else
+ Ekind (E1) = E_Named_Real
+ or else
+ Is_Overloadable (E1)
+
+ -- Package case, if the main unit is a package spec
+ -- or generic package spec, then there may be a
+ -- corresponding body that references this package
+ -- in some other file. Otherwise we can be sure
+ -- that there is no other reference.
+
+ or else
+ (Ekind (E1) = E_Package
+ and then
+ not Is_Package_Or_Generic_Package
+ (Cunit_Entity (Current_Sem_Unit))))
+
+ -- Exclude instantiations, since there is no reason why every
+ -- entity in an instantiation should be referenced.
+
+ and then Instantiation_Location (Sloc (E1)) = No_Location
+
+ -- Exclude formal parameters from bodies if the corresponding
+ -- spec entity has been referenced in the case where there is
+ -- a separate spec.
+
+ and then not (Is_Formal (E1)
+ and then Ekind (Scope (E1)) = E_Subprogram_Body
+ and then Present (Spec_Entity (E1))
+ and then Referenced (Spec_Entity (E1)))
+
+ -- Consider private type referenced if full view is referenced.
+ -- If there is not full view, this is a generic type on which
+ -- warnings are also useful.
+
+ and then
+ not (Is_Private_Type (E1)
+ and then Present (Full_View (E1))
+ and then Referenced (Full_View (E1)))
+
+ -- Don't worry about full view, only about private type
+
+ and then not Has_Private_Declaration (E1)
+
+ -- Eliminate dispatching operations from consideration, we
+ -- cannot tell if these are referenced or not in any easy
+ -- manner (note this also catches Adjust/Finalize/Initialize).
+
+ and then not Is_Dispatching_Operation (E1)
+
+ -- Check entity that can be publicly referenced (we do not give
+ -- messages for such entities, since there could be other
+ -- units, not involved in this compilation, that contain
+ -- relevant references.
+
+ and then not Publicly_Referenceable (E1)
+
+ -- Class wide types are marked as source entities, but they are
+ -- not really source entities, and are always created, so we do
+ -- not care if they are not referenced.
+
+ and then Ekind (E1) /= E_Class_Wide_Type
+
+ -- Objects other than parameters of task types are allowed to
+ -- be non-referenced, since they start up tasks!
+
+ and then ((Ekind (E1) /= E_Variable
+ and then Ekind (E1) /= E_Constant
+ and then Ekind (E1) /= E_Component)
+ or else not Is_Task_Type (E1T))
+
+ -- For subunits, only place warnings on the main unit itself,
+ -- since parent units are not completely compiled.
+
+ and then (Nkind (Unit (Cunit (Main_Unit))) /= N_Subunit
+ or else Get_Source_Unit (E1) = Main_Unit)
+
+ -- No warning on a return object, because these are often
+ -- created with a single expression and an implicit return.
+ -- If the object is a variable there will be a warning
+ -- indicating that it could be declared constant.
+
+ and then not
+ (Ekind (E1) = E_Constant and then Is_Return_Object (E1))
+ then
+ -- Suppress warnings in internal units if not in -gnatg mode
+ -- (these would be junk warnings for an applications program,
+ -- since they refer to problems in internal units).
+
+ if GNAT_Mode
+ or else not Is_Internal_File_Name
+ (Unit_File_Name (Get_Source_Unit (E1)))
+ then
+ -- We do not immediately flag the error. This is because we
+ -- have not expanded generic bodies yet, and they may have
+ -- the missing reference. So instead we park the entity on a
+ -- list, for later processing. However for the case of an
+ -- accept statement we want to output messages now, since
+ -- we know we already have all information at hand, and we
+ -- also want to have separate warnings for each accept
+ -- statement for the same entry.
+
+ if Present (Anod) then
+ pragma Assert (Is_Formal (E1));
+
+ -- The unreferenced entity is E1, but post the warning
+ -- on the body entity for this accept statement.
+
+ if not Warnings_Off_E1 then
+ Warn_On_Unreferenced_Entity
+ (E1, Body_Formal (E1, Accept_Statement => Anod));
+ end if;
+
+ elsif not Warnings_Off_E1 then
+ Unreferenced_Entities.Append (E1);
+ end if;
+ end if;
+
+ -- Generic units are referenced in the generic body, but if they
+ -- are not public and never instantiated we want to force a
+ -- warning on them. We treat them as redundant constructs to
+ -- minimize noise.
+
+ elsif Is_Generic_Subprogram (E1)
+ and then not Is_Instantiated (E1)
+ and then not Publicly_Referenceable (E1)
+ and then Instantiation_Depth (Sloc (E1)) = 0
+ and then Warn_On_Redundant_Constructs
+ then
+ if not Warnings_Off_E1 then
+ Unreferenced_Entities.Append (E1);
+
+ -- Force warning on entity
+
+ Set_Referenced (E1, False);
+ end if;
+ end if;
+ end if;
+
+ -- Recurse into nested package or block. Do not recurse into a formal
+ -- package, because the corresponding body is not analyzed.
+
+ <<Continue>>
+ if (Is_Package_Or_Generic_Package (E1)
+ and then Nkind (Parent (E1)) = N_Package_Specification
+ and then
+ Nkind (Original_Node (Unit_Declaration_Node (E1)))
+ /= N_Formal_Package_Declaration)
+
+ or else Ekind (E1) = E_Block
+ then
+ Check_References (E1);
+ end if;
+
+ Next_Entity (E1);
+ end loop;
+ end Check_References;
+
+ ---------------------------
+ -- Check_Unset_Reference --
+ ---------------------------
+
+ procedure Check_Unset_Reference (N : Node_Id) is
+ Typ : constant Entity_Id := Etype (N);
+
+ function Is_OK_Fully_Initialized return Boolean;
+ -- This function returns true if the given node N is fully initialized
+ -- so that the reference is safe as far as this routine is concerned.
+ -- Safe generally means that the type of N is a fully initialized type.
+ -- The one special case is that for access types, which are always fully
+ -- initialized, we don't consider a dereference OK since it will surely
+ -- be dereferencing a null value, which won't do.
+
+ function Prefix_Has_Dereference (Pref : Node_Id) return Boolean;
+ -- Used to test indexed or selected component or slice to see if the
+ -- evaluation of the prefix depends on a dereference, and if so, returns
+ -- True, in which case we always check the prefix, even if we know that
+ -- the referenced component is initialized. Pref is the prefix to test.
+
+ -----------------------------
+ -- Is_OK_Fully_Initialized --
+ -----------------------------
+
+ function Is_OK_Fully_Initialized return Boolean is
+ begin
+ if Is_Access_Type (Typ) and then Is_Dereferenced (N) then
+ return False;
+ else
+ return Is_Fully_Initialized_Type (Typ);
+ end if;
+ end Is_OK_Fully_Initialized;
+
+ ----------------------------
+ -- Prefix_Has_Dereference --
+ ----------------------------
+
+ function Prefix_Has_Dereference (Pref : Node_Id) return Boolean is
+ begin
+ -- If prefix is of an access type, it certainly needs a dereference
+
+ if Is_Access_Type (Etype (Pref)) then
+ return True;
+
+ -- If prefix is explicit dereference, that's a dereference for sure
+
+ elsif Nkind (Pref) = N_Explicit_Dereference then
+ return True;
+
+ -- If prefix is itself a component reference or slice check prefix
+
+ elsif Nkind (Pref) = N_Slice
+ or else Nkind (Pref) = N_Indexed_Component
+ or else Nkind (Pref) = N_Selected_Component
+ then
+ return Prefix_Has_Dereference (Prefix (Pref));
+
+ -- All other cases do not involve a dereference
+
+ else
+ return False;
+ end if;
+ end Prefix_Has_Dereference;
+
+ -- Start of processing for Check_Unset_Reference
+
+ begin
+ -- Nothing to do if warnings suppressed
+
+ if Warning_Mode = Suppress then
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ -- Ignore reference unless it comes from source. Almost always if we
+ -- have a reference from generated code, it is bogus (e.g. calls to init
+ -- procs to set default discriminant values).
+
+ if not Comes_From_Source (N) then
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ -- Otherwise see what kind of node we have. If the entity already has an
+ -- unset reference, it is not necessarily the earliest in the text,
+ -- because resolution of the prefix of selected components is completed
+ -- before the resolution of the selected component itself. As a result,
+ -- given (R /= null and then R.X > 0), the occurrences of R are examined
+ -- in right-to-left order. If there is already an unset reference, we
+ -- check whether N is earlier before proceeding.
+
+ case Nkind (N) is
+
+ -- For identifier or expanded name, examine the entity involved
+
+ when N_Identifier | N_Expanded_Name =>
+ declare
+ E : constant Entity_Id := Entity (N);
+
+ begin
+ if (Ekind (E) = E_Variable
+ or else
+ Ekind (E) = E_Out_Parameter)
+ and then Never_Set_In_Source_Check_Spec (E)
+ and then not Has_Initial_Value (E)
+ and then (No (Unset_Reference (E))
+ or else
+ Earlier_In_Extended_Unit
+ (Sloc (N), Sloc (Unset_Reference (E))))
+ and then not Has_Pragma_Unmodified_Check_Spec (E)
+ and then not Warnings_Off_Check_Spec (E)
+ then
+ -- We may have an unset reference. The first test is whether
+ -- this is an access to a discriminant of a record or a
+ -- component with default initialization. Both of these
+ -- cases can be ignored, since the actual object that is
+ -- referenced is definitely initialized. Note that this
+ -- covers the case of reading discriminants of an OUT
+ -- parameter, which is OK even in Ada 83.
+
+ -- Note that we are only interested in a direct reference to
+ -- a record component here. If the reference is through an
+ -- access type, then the access object is being referenced,
+ -- not the record, and still deserves an unset reference.
+
+ if Nkind (Parent (N)) = N_Selected_Component
+ and not Is_Access_Type (Typ)
+ then
+ declare
+ ES : constant Entity_Id :=
+ Entity (Selector_Name (Parent (N)));
+ begin
+ if Ekind (ES) = E_Discriminant
+ or else
+ (Present (Declaration_Node (ES))
+ and then
+ Present (Expression (Declaration_Node (ES))))
+ then
+ return;
+ end if;
+ end;
+ end if;
+
+ -- Exclude fully initialized types
+
+ if Is_OK_Fully_Initialized then
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ -- Here we have a potential unset reference. But before we
+ -- get worried about it, we have to make sure that the
+ -- entity declaration is in the same procedure as the
+ -- reference, since if they are in separate procedures, then
+ -- we have no idea about sequential execution.
+
+ -- The tests in the loop below catch all such cases, but do
+ -- allow the reference to appear in a loop, block, or
+ -- package spec that is nested within the declaring scope.
+ -- As always, it is possible to construct cases where the
+ -- warning is wrong, that is why it is a warning!
+
+ Potential_Unset_Reference : declare
+ SR : Entity_Id;
+ SE : constant Entity_Id := Scope (E);
+
+ function Within_Postcondition return Boolean;
+ -- Returns True iff N is within a Postcondition or
+ -- Ensures component in a Contract_Case or Test_Case.
+
+ --------------------------
+ -- Within_Postcondition --
+ --------------------------
+
+ function Within_Postcondition return Boolean is
+ Nod, P : Node_Id;
+
+ begin
+ Nod := Parent (N);
+ while Present (Nod) loop
+ if Nkind (Nod) = N_Pragma
+ and then Pragma_Name (Nod) = Name_Postcondition
+ then
+ return True;
+
+ elsif Present (Parent (Nod)) then
+ P := Parent (Nod);
+
+ if Nkind (P) = N_Pragma
+ and then
+ (Pragma_Name (P) = Name_Contract_Case
+ or else
+ Pragma_Name (P) = Name_Test_Case)
+ and then
+ Nod = Get_Ensures_From_CTC_Pragma (P)
+ then
+ return True;
+ end if;
+ end if;
+
+ Nod := Parent (Nod);
+ end loop;
+
+ return False;
+ end Within_Postcondition;
+
+ -- Start of processing for Potential_Unset_Reference
+
+ begin
+ SR := Current_Scope;
+ while SR /= SE loop
+ if SR = Standard_Standard
+ or else Is_Subprogram (SR)
+ or else Is_Concurrent_Body (SR)
+ or else Is_Concurrent_Type (SR)
+ then
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ SR := Scope (SR);
+ end loop;
+
+ -- Case of reference has an access type. This is a
+ -- special case since access types are always set to null
+ -- so cannot be truly uninitialized, but we still want to
+ -- warn about cases of obvious null dereference.
+
+ if Is_Access_Type (Typ) then
+ Access_Type_Case : declare
+ P : Node_Id;
+
+ function Process
+ (N : Node_Id) return Traverse_Result;
+ -- Process function for instantiation of Traverse
+ -- below. Checks if N contains reference to E other
+ -- than a dereference.
+
+ function Ref_In (Nod : Node_Id) return Boolean;
+ -- Determines whether Nod contains a reference to
+ -- the entity E that is not a dereference.
+
+ -------------
+ -- Process --
+ -------------
+
+ function Process
+ (N : Node_Id) return Traverse_Result
+ is
+ begin
+ if Is_Entity_Name (N)
+ and then Entity (N) = E
+ and then not Is_Dereferenced (N)
+ then
+ return Abandon;
+ else
+ return OK;
+ end if;
+ end Process;
+
+ ------------
+ -- Ref_In --
+ ------------
+
+ function Ref_In (Nod : Node_Id) return Boolean is
+ function Traverse is new Traverse_Func (Process);
+ begin
+ return Traverse (Nod) = Abandon;
+ end Ref_In;
+
+ -- Start of processing for Access_Type_Case
+
+ begin
+ -- Don't bother if we are inside an instance, since
+ -- the compilation of the generic template is where
+ -- the warning should be issued.
+
+ if In_Instance then
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ -- Don't bother if this is not the main unit. If we
+ -- try to give this warning for with'ed units, we
+ -- get some false positives, since we do not record
+ -- references in other units.
+
+ if not In_Extended_Main_Source_Unit (E)
+ or else
+ not In_Extended_Main_Source_Unit (N)
+ then
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ -- We are only interested in dereferences
+
+ if not Is_Dereferenced (N) then
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ -- One more check, don't bother with references
+ -- that are inside conditional statements or WHILE
+ -- loops if the condition references the entity in
+ -- question. This avoids most false positives.
+
+ P := Parent (N);
+ loop
+ P := Parent (P);
+ exit when No (P);
+
+ if (Nkind (P) = N_If_Statement
+ or else
+ Nkind (P) = N_Elsif_Part)
+ and then Ref_In (Condition (P))
+ then
+ return;
+
+ elsif Nkind (P) = N_Loop_Statement
+ and then Present (Iteration_Scheme (P))
+ and then
+ Ref_In (Condition (Iteration_Scheme (P)))
+ then
+ return;
+ end if;
+ end loop;
+ end Access_Type_Case;
+ end if;
+
+ -- One more check, don't bother if we are within a
+ -- postcondition, since the expression occurs in a
+ -- place unrelated to the actual test.
+
+ if not Within_Postcondition then
+
+ -- Here we definitely have a case for giving a warning
+ -- for a reference to an unset value. But we don't
+ -- give the warning now. Instead set Unset_Reference
+ -- in the identifier involved. The reason for this is
+ -- that if we find the variable is never ever assigned
+ -- a value then that warning is more important and
+ -- there is no point in giving the reference warning.
+
+ -- If this is an identifier, set the field directly
+
+ if Nkind (N) = N_Identifier then
+ Set_Unset_Reference (E, N);
+
+ -- Otherwise it is an expanded name, so set the field
+ -- of the actual identifier for the reference.
+
+ else
+ Set_Unset_Reference (E, Selector_Name (N));
+ end if;
+ end if;
+ end Potential_Unset_Reference;
+ end if;
+ end;
+
+ -- Indexed component or slice
+
+ when N_Indexed_Component | N_Slice =>
+
+ -- If prefix does not involve dereferencing an access type, then
+ -- we know we are OK if the component type is fully initialized,
+ -- since the component will have been set as part of the default
+ -- initialization.
+
+ if not Prefix_Has_Dereference (Prefix (N))
+ and then Is_OK_Fully_Initialized
+ then
+ return;
+
+ -- Look at prefix in access type case, or if the component is not
+ -- fully initialized.
+
+ else
+ Check_Unset_Reference (Prefix (N));
+ end if;
+
+ -- Record component
+
+ when N_Selected_Component =>
+ declare
+ Pref : constant Node_Id := Prefix (N);
+ Ent : constant Entity_Id := Entity (Selector_Name (N));
+
+ begin
+ -- If prefix involves dereferencing an access type, always
+ -- check the prefix, since the issue then is whether this
+ -- access value is null.
+
+ if Prefix_Has_Dereference (Pref) then
+ null;
+
+ -- Always go to prefix if no selector entity is set. Can this
+ -- happen in the normal case? Not clear, but it definitely can
+ -- happen in error cases.
+
+ elsif No (Ent) then
+ null;
+
+ -- For a record component, check some cases where we have
+ -- reasonable cause to consider that the component is known to
+ -- be or probably is initialized. In this case, we don't care
+ -- if the prefix itself was explicitly initialized.
+
+ -- Discriminants are always considered initialized
+
+ elsif Ekind (Ent) = E_Discriminant then
+ return;
+
+ -- An explicitly initialized component is certainly initialized
+
+ elsif Nkind (Parent (Ent)) = N_Component_Declaration
+ and then Present (Expression (Parent (Ent)))
+ then
+ return;
+
+ -- A fully initialized component is initialized
+
+ elsif Is_OK_Fully_Initialized then
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ -- If none of those cases apply, check the record type prefix
+
+ Check_Unset_Reference (Pref);
+ end;
+
+ -- For type conversions or qualifications examine the expression
+
+ when N_Type_Conversion | N_Qualified_Expression =>
+ Check_Unset_Reference (Expression (N));
+
+ -- For explicit dereference, always check prefix, which will generate
+ -- an unset reference (since this is a case of dereferencing null).
+
+ when N_Explicit_Dereference =>
+ Check_Unset_Reference (Prefix (N));
+
+ -- All other cases are not cases of an unset reference
+
+ when others =>
+ null;
+
+ end case;
+ end Check_Unset_Reference;
+
+ ------------------------
+ -- Check_Unused_Withs --
+ ------------------------
+
+ procedure Check_Unused_Withs (Spec_Unit : Unit_Number_Type := No_Unit) is
+ Cnode : Node_Id;
+ Item : Node_Id;
+ Lunit : Node_Id;
+ Ent : Entity_Id;
+
+ Munite : constant Entity_Id := Cunit_Entity (Main_Unit);
+ -- This is needed for checking the special renaming case
+
+ procedure Check_One_Unit (Unit : Unit_Number_Type);
+ -- Subsidiary procedure, performs checks for specified unit
+
+ --------------------
+ -- Check_One_Unit --
+ --------------------
+
+ procedure Check_One_Unit (Unit : Unit_Number_Type) is
+ Is_Visible_Renaming : Boolean := False;
+ Pack : Entity_Id;
+
+ procedure Check_Inner_Package (Pack : Entity_Id);
+ -- Pack is a package local to a unit in a with_clause. Both the unit
+ -- and Pack are referenced. If none of the entities in Pack are
+ -- referenced, then the only occurrence of Pack is in a USE clause
+ -- or a pragma, and a warning is worthwhile as well.
+
+ function Check_System_Aux return Boolean;
+ -- Before giving a warning on a with_clause for System, check whether
+ -- a system extension is present.
+
+ function Find_Package_Renaming
+ (P : Entity_Id;
+ L : Entity_Id) return Entity_Id;
+ -- The only reference to a context unit may be in a renaming
+ -- declaration. If this renaming declares a visible entity, do not
+ -- warn that the context clause could be moved to the body, because
+ -- the renaming may be intended to re-export the unit.
+
+ function Has_Visible_Entities (P : Entity_Id) return Boolean;
+ -- This function determines if a package has any visible entities.
+ -- True is returned if there is at least one declared visible entity,
+ -- otherwise False is returned (e.g. case of only pragmas present).
+
+ -------------------------
+ -- Check_Inner_Package --
+ -------------------------
+
+ procedure Check_Inner_Package (Pack : Entity_Id) is
+ E : Entity_Id;
+ Un : constant Node_Id := Sinfo.Unit (Cnode);
+
+ function Check_Use_Clause (N : Node_Id) return Traverse_Result;
+ -- If N is a use_clause for Pack, emit warning
+
+ procedure Check_Use_Clauses is new
+ Traverse_Proc (Check_Use_Clause);
+
+ ----------------------
+ -- Check_Use_Clause --
+ ----------------------
+
+ function Check_Use_Clause (N : Node_Id) return Traverse_Result is
+ Nam : Node_Id;
+
+ begin
+ if Nkind (N) = N_Use_Package_Clause then
+ Nam := First (Names (N));
+ while Present (Nam) loop
+ if Entity (Nam) = Pack then
+ Error_Msg_Qual_Level := 1;
+ Error_Msg_NE -- CODEFIX
+ ("?u?no entities of package& are referenced!",
+ Nam, Pack);
+ Error_Msg_Qual_Level := 0;
+ end if;
+
+ Next (Nam);
+ end loop;
+ end if;
+
+ return OK;
+ end Check_Use_Clause;
+
+ -- Start of processing for Check_Inner_Package
+
+ begin
+ E := First_Entity (Pack);
+ while Present (E) loop
+ if Referenced_Check_Spec (E) then
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ Next_Entity (E);
+ end loop;
+
+ -- No entities of the package are referenced. Check whether the
+ -- reference to the package itself is a use clause, and if so
+ -- place a warning on it.
+
+ Check_Use_Clauses (Un);
+ end Check_Inner_Package;
+
+ ----------------------
+ -- Check_System_Aux --
+ ----------------------
+
+ function Check_System_Aux return Boolean is
+ Ent : Entity_Id;
+
+ begin
+ if Chars (Lunit) = Name_System
+ and then Scope (Lunit) = Standard_Standard
+ and then Present_System_Aux
+ then
+ Ent := First_Entity (System_Aux_Id);
+ while Present (Ent) loop
+ if Referenced_Check_Spec (Ent) then
+ return True;
+ end if;
+
+ Next_Entity (Ent);
+ end loop;
+ end if;
+
+ return False;
+ end Check_System_Aux;
+
+ ---------------------------
+ -- Find_Package_Renaming --
+ ---------------------------
+
+ function Find_Package_Renaming
+ (P : Entity_Id;
+ L : Entity_Id) return Entity_Id
+ is
+ E1 : Entity_Id;
+ R : Entity_Id;
+
+ begin
+ Is_Visible_Renaming := False;
+
+ E1 := First_Entity (P);
+ while Present (E1) loop
+ if Ekind (E1) = E_Package
+ and then Renamed_Object (E1) = L
+ then
+ Is_Visible_Renaming := not Is_Hidden (E1);
+ return E1;
+
+ elsif Ekind (E1) = E_Package
+ and then No (Renamed_Object (E1))
+ and then not Is_Generic_Instance (E1)
+ then
+ R := Find_Package_Renaming (E1, L);
+
+ if Present (R) then
+ Is_Visible_Renaming := not Is_Hidden (R);
+ return R;
+ end if;
+ end if;
+
+ Next_Entity (E1);
+ end loop;
+
+ return Empty;
+ end Find_Package_Renaming;
+
+ --------------------------
+ -- Has_Visible_Entities --
+ --------------------------
+
+ function Has_Visible_Entities (P : Entity_Id) return Boolean is
+ E : Entity_Id;
+
+ begin
+ -- If unit in context is not a package, it is a subprogram that
+ -- is not called or a generic unit that is not instantiated
+ -- in the current unit, and warning is appropriate.
+
+ if Ekind (P) /= E_Package then
+ return True;
+ end if;
+
+ -- If unit comes from a limited_with clause, look for declaration
+ -- of shadow entities.
+
+ if Present (Limited_View (P)) then
+ E := First_Entity (Limited_View (P));
+ else
+ E := First_Entity (P);
+ end if;
+
+ while Present (E)
+ and then E /= First_Private_Entity (P)
+ loop
+ if Comes_From_Source (E)
+ or else Present (Limited_View (P))
+ then
+ return True;
+ end if;
+
+ Next_Entity (E);
+ end loop;
+
+ return False;
+ end Has_Visible_Entities;
+
+ -- Start of processing for Check_One_Unit
+
+ begin
+ Cnode := Cunit (Unit);
+
+ -- Only do check in units that are part of the extended main unit.
+ -- This is actually a necessary restriction, because in the case of
+ -- subprogram acting as its own specification, there can be with's in
+ -- subunits that we will not see.
+
+ if not In_Extended_Main_Source_Unit (Cnode) then
+ return;
+
+ -- In configurable run time mode, we remove the bodies of non-inlined
+ -- subprograms, which may lead to spurious warnings, which are
+ -- clearly undesirable.
+
+ elsif Configurable_Run_Time_Mode
+ and then Is_Predefined_File_Name (Unit_File_Name (Unit))
+ then
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ -- Loop through context items in this unit
+
+ Item := First (Context_Items (Cnode));
+ while Present (Item) loop
+ if Nkind (Item) = N_With_Clause
+ and then not Implicit_With (Item)
+ and then In_Extended_Main_Source_Unit (Item)
+ then
+ Lunit := Entity (Name (Item));
+
+ -- Check if this unit is referenced (skip the check if this
+ -- is explicitly marked by a pragma Unreferenced).
+
+ if not Referenced (Lunit)
+ and then not Has_Unreferenced (Lunit)
+ then
+ -- Suppress warnings in internal units if not in -gnatg mode
+ -- (these would be junk warnings for an application program,
+ -- since they refer to problems in internal units).
+
+ if GNAT_Mode
+ or else not Is_Internal_File_Name (Unit_File_Name (Unit))
+ then
+ -- Here we definitely have a non-referenced unit. If it
+ -- is the special call for a spec unit, then just set the
+ -- flag to be read later.
+
+ if Unit = Spec_Unit then
+ Set_Unreferenced_In_Spec (Item);
+
+ -- Otherwise simple unreferenced message, but skip this
+ -- if no visible entities, because that is most likely a
+ -- case where warning would be false positive (e.g. a
+ -- package with only a linker options pragma and nothing
+ -- else or a pragma elaborate with a body library task).
+
+ elsif Has_Visible_Entities (Entity (Name (Item))) then
+ Error_Msg_N -- CODEFIX
+ ("?u?unit& is not referenced!", Name (Item));
+ end if;
+ end if;
+
+ -- If main unit is a renaming of this unit, then we consider
+ -- the with to be OK (obviously it is needed in this case!)
+ -- This may be transitive: the unit in the with_clause may
+ -- itself be a renaming, in which case both it and the main
+ -- unit rename the same ultimate package.
+
+ elsif Present (Renamed_Entity (Munite))
+ and then
+ (Renamed_Entity (Munite) = Lunit
+ or else Renamed_Entity (Munite) = Renamed_Entity (Lunit))
+ then
+ null;
+
+ -- If this unit is referenced, and it is a package, we do
+ -- another test, to see if any of the entities in the package
+ -- are referenced. If none of the entities are referenced, we
+ -- still post a warning. This occurs if the only use of the
+ -- package is in a use clause, or in a package renaming
+ -- declaration. This check is skipped for packages that are
+ -- renamed in a spec, since the entities in such a package are
+ -- visible to clients via the renaming.
+
+ elsif Ekind (Lunit) = E_Package
+ and then not Renamed_In_Spec (Lunit)
+ then
+ -- If Is_Instantiated is set, it means that the package is
+ -- implicitly instantiated (this is the case of parent
+ -- instance or an actual for a generic package formal), and
+ -- this counts as a reference.
+
+ if Is_Instantiated (Lunit) then
+ null;
+
+ -- If no entities in package, and there is a pragma
+ -- Elaborate_Body present, then assume that this with is
+ -- done for purposes of this elaboration.
+
+ elsif No (First_Entity (Lunit))
+ and then Has_Pragma_Elaborate_Body (Lunit)
+ then
+ null;
+
+ -- Otherwise see if any entities have been referenced
+
+ else
+ if Limited_Present (Item) then
+ Ent := First_Entity (Limited_View (Lunit));
+ else
+ Ent := First_Entity (Lunit);
+ end if;
+
+ loop
+ -- No more entities, and we did not find one that was
+ -- referenced. Means we have a definite case of a with
+ -- none of whose entities was referenced.
+
+ if No (Ent) then
+
+ -- If in spec, just set the flag
+
+ if Unit = Spec_Unit then
+ Set_No_Entities_Ref_In_Spec (Item);
+
+ elsif Check_System_Aux then
+ null;
+
+ -- Else give the warning
+
+ else
+ if not
+ Has_Unreferenced (Entity (Name (Item)))
+ then
+ Error_Msg_N -- CODEFIX
+ ("?u?no entities of & are referenced!",
+ Name (Item));
+ end if;
+
+ -- Look for renamings of this package, and flag
+ -- them as well. If the original package has
+ -- warnings off, we suppress the warning on the
+ -- renaming as well.
+
+ Pack := Find_Package_Renaming (Munite, Lunit);
+
+ if Present (Pack)
+ and then not Has_Warnings_Off (Lunit)
+ and then not Has_Unreferenced (Pack)
+ then
+ Error_Msg_NE -- CODEFIX
+ ("?u?no entities of & are referenced!",
+ Unit_Declaration_Node (Pack),
+ Pack);
+ end if;
+ end if;
+
+ exit;
+
+ -- Case of entity being referenced. The reference may
+ -- come from a limited_with_clause, in which case the
+ -- limited view of the entity carries the flag.
+
+ elsif Referenced_Check_Spec (Ent)
+ or else Referenced_As_LHS_Check_Spec (Ent)
+ or else Referenced_As_Out_Parameter_Check_Spec (Ent)
+ or else
+ (From_With_Type (Ent)
+ and then Is_Incomplete_Type (Ent)
+ and then Present (Non_Limited_View (Ent))
+ and then Referenced (Non_Limited_View (Ent)))
+ then
+ -- This means that the with is indeed fine, in that
+ -- it is definitely needed somewhere, and we can
+ -- quit worrying about this one...
+
+ -- Except for one little detail: if either of the
+ -- flags was set during spec processing, this is
+ -- where we complain that the with could be moved
+ -- from the spec. If the spec contains a visible
+ -- renaming of the package, inhibit warning to move
+ -- with_clause to body.
+
+ if Ekind (Munite) = E_Package_Body then
+ Pack :=
+ Find_Package_Renaming
+ (Spec_Entity (Munite), Lunit);
+ else
+ Pack := Empty;
+ end if;
+
+ -- If a renaming is present in the spec do not warn
+ -- because the body or child unit may depend on it.
+
+ if Present (Pack)
+ and then Renamed_Entity (Pack) = Lunit
+ then
+ exit;
+
+ elsif Unreferenced_In_Spec (Item) then
+ Error_Msg_N -- CODEFIX
+ ("?u?unit& is not referenced in spec!",
+ Name (Item));
+
+ elsif No_Entities_Ref_In_Spec (Item) then
+ Error_Msg_N -- CODEFIX
+ ("?u?no entities of & are referenced in spec!",
+ Name (Item));
+
+ else
+ if Ekind (Ent) = E_Package then
+ Check_Inner_Package (Ent);
+ end if;
+
+ exit;
+ end if;
+
+ if not Is_Visible_Renaming then
+ Error_Msg_N -- CODEFIX
+ ("\?u?with clause might be moved to body!",
+ Name (Item));
+ end if;
+
+ exit;
+
+ -- Move to next entity to continue search
+
+ else
+ Next_Entity (Ent);
+ end if;
+ end loop;
+ end if;
+
+ -- For a generic package, the only interesting kind of
+ -- reference is an instantiation, since entities cannot be
+ -- referenced directly.
+
+ elsif Is_Generic_Unit (Lunit) then
+
+ -- Unit was never instantiated, set flag for case of spec
+ -- call, or give warning for normal call.
+
+ if not Is_Instantiated (Lunit) then
+ if Unit = Spec_Unit then
+ Set_Unreferenced_In_Spec (Item);
+ else
+ Error_Msg_N -- CODEFIX
+ ("?u?unit& is never instantiated!", Name (Item));
+ end if;
+
+ -- If unit was indeed instantiated, make sure that flag is
+ -- not set showing it was uninstantiated in the spec, and if
+ -- so, give warning.
+
+ elsif Unreferenced_In_Spec (Item) then
+ Error_Msg_N
+ ("?u?unit& is not instantiated in spec!", Name (Item));
+ Error_Msg_N -- CODEFIX
+ ("\?u?with clause can be moved to body!", Name (Item));
+ end if;
+ end if;
+ end if;
+
+ Next (Item);
+ end loop;
+ end Check_One_Unit;
+
+ -- Start of processing for Check_Unused_Withs
+
+ begin
+ if not Opt.Check_Withs or else Operating_Mode = Check_Syntax then
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ -- Flag any unused with clauses, but skip this step if we are compiling
+ -- a subunit on its own, since we do not have enough information to
+ -- determine whether with's are used. We will get the relevant warnings
+ -- when we compile the parent. This is the normal style of GNAT
+ -- compilation in any case.
+
+ if Nkind (Unit (Cunit (Main_Unit))) = N_Subunit then
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ -- Process specified units
+
+ if Spec_Unit = No_Unit then
+
+ -- For main call, check all units
+
+ for Unit in Main_Unit .. Last_Unit loop
+ Check_One_Unit (Unit);
+ end loop;
+
+ else
+ -- For call for spec, check only the spec
+
+ Check_One_Unit (Spec_Unit);
+ end if;
+ end Check_Unused_Withs;
+
+ ---------------------------------
+ -- Generic_Package_Spec_Entity --
+ ---------------------------------
+
+ function Generic_Package_Spec_Entity (E : Entity_Id) return Boolean is
+ S : Entity_Id;
+
+ begin
+ if Is_Package_Body_Entity (E) then
+ return False;
+
+ else
+ S := Scope (E);
+ loop
+ if S = Standard_Standard then
+ return False;
+
+ elsif Ekind (S) = E_Generic_Package then
+ return True;
+
+ elsif Ekind (S) = E_Package then
+ S := Scope (S);
+
+ else
+ return False;
+ end if;
+ end loop;
+ end if;
+ end Generic_Package_Spec_Entity;
+
+ ----------------------
+ -- Goto_Spec_Entity --
+ ----------------------
+
+ function Goto_Spec_Entity (E : Entity_Id) return Entity_Id is
+ begin
+ if Is_Formal (E)
+ and then Present (Spec_Entity (E))
+ then
+ return Spec_Entity (E);
+ else
+ return E;
+ end if;
+ end Goto_Spec_Entity;
+
+ --------------------------------------
+ -- Has_Pragma_Unmodified_Check_Spec --
+ --------------------------------------
+
+ function Has_Pragma_Unmodified_Check_Spec
+ (E : Entity_Id) return Boolean
+ is
+ begin
+ if Is_Formal (E) and then Present (Spec_Entity (E)) then
+
+ -- Note: use of OR instead of OR ELSE here is deliberate, we want
+ -- to mess with Unmodified flags on both body and spec entities.
+
+ return Has_Unmodified (E)
+ or
+ Has_Unmodified (Spec_Entity (E));
+
+ else
+ return Has_Unmodified (E);
+ end if;
+ end Has_Pragma_Unmodified_Check_Spec;
+
+ ----------------------------------------
+ -- Has_Pragma_Unreferenced_Check_Spec --
+ ----------------------------------------
+
+ function Has_Pragma_Unreferenced_Check_Spec
+ (E : Entity_Id) return Boolean
+ is
+ begin
+ if Is_Formal (E) and then Present (Spec_Entity (E)) then
+
+ -- Note: use of OR here instead of OR ELSE is deliberate, we want
+ -- to mess with flags on both entities.
+
+ return Has_Unreferenced (E)
+ or
+ Has_Unreferenced (Spec_Entity (E));
+
+ else
+ return Has_Unreferenced (E);
+ end if;
+ end Has_Pragma_Unreferenced_Check_Spec;
+
+ ----------------
+ -- Initialize --
+ ----------------
+
+ procedure Initialize is
+ begin
+ Warnings_Off_Pragmas.Init;
+ Unreferenced_Entities.Init;
+ In_Out_Warnings.Init;
+ end Initialize;
+
+ ------------------------------------
+ -- Never_Set_In_Source_Check_Spec --
+ ------------------------------------
+
+ function Never_Set_In_Source_Check_Spec (E : Entity_Id) return Boolean is
+ begin
+ if Is_Formal (E) and then Present (Spec_Entity (E)) then
+ return Never_Set_In_Source (E)
+ and then
+ Never_Set_In_Source (Spec_Entity (E));
+ else
+ return Never_Set_In_Source (E);
+ end if;
+ end Never_Set_In_Source_Check_Spec;
+
+ -------------------------------------
+ -- Operand_Has_Warnings_Suppressed --
+ -------------------------------------
+
+ function Operand_Has_Warnings_Suppressed (N : Node_Id) return Boolean is
+
+ function Check_For_Warnings (N : Node_Id) return Traverse_Result;
+ -- Function used to check one node to see if it is or was originally
+ -- a reference to an entity for which Warnings are off. If so, Abandon
+ -- is returned, otherwise OK_Orig is returned to continue the traversal
+ -- of the original expression.
+
+ function Traverse is new Traverse_Func (Check_For_Warnings);
+ -- Function used to traverse tree looking for warnings
+
+ ------------------------
+ -- Check_For_Warnings --
+ ------------------------
+
+ function Check_For_Warnings (N : Node_Id) return Traverse_Result is
+ R : constant Node_Id := Original_Node (N);
+
+ begin
+ if Nkind (R) in N_Has_Entity
+ and then Present (Entity (R))
+ and then Has_Warnings_Off (Entity (R))
+ then
+ return Abandon;
+ else
+ return OK_Orig;
+ end if;
+ end Check_For_Warnings;
+
+ -- Start of processing for Operand_Has_Warnings_Suppressed
+
+ begin
+ return Traverse (N) = Abandon;
+
+ -- If any exception occurs, then something has gone wrong, and this is
+ -- only a minor aesthetic issue anyway, so just say we did not find what
+ -- we are looking for, rather than blow up.
+
+ exception
+ when others =>
+ return False;
+ end Operand_Has_Warnings_Suppressed;
+
+ -----------------------------------------
+ -- Output_Non_Modified_In_Out_Warnings --
+ -----------------------------------------
+
+ procedure Output_Non_Modified_In_Out_Warnings is
+
+ function No_Warn_On_In_Out (E : Entity_Id) return Boolean;
+ -- Given a formal parameter entity E, determines if there is a reason to
+ -- suppress IN OUT warnings (not modified, could be IN) for formals of
+ -- the subprogram. We suppress these warnings if Warnings Off is set, or
+ -- if we have seen the address of the subprogram being taken, or if the
+ -- subprogram is used as a generic actual (in the latter cases the
+ -- context may force use of IN OUT, even if the parameter is not
+ -- modifies for this particular case.
+
+ -----------------------
+ -- No_Warn_On_In_Out --
+ -----------------------
+
+ function No_Warn_On_In_Out (E : Entity_Id) return Boolean is
+ S : constant Entity_Id := Scope (E);
+ SE : constant Entity_Id := Spec_Entity (E);
+
+ begin
+ -- Do not warn if address is taken, since funny business may be going
+ -- on in treating the parameter indirectly as IN OUT.
+
+ if Address_Taken (S)
+ or else (Present (SE) and then Address_Taken (Scope (SE)))
+ then
+ return True;
+
+ -- Do not warn if used as a generic actual, since the generic may be
+ -- what is forcing the use of an "unnecessary" IN OUT.
+
+ elsif Used_As_Generic_Actual (S)
+ or else (Present (SE) and then Used_As_Generic_Actual (Scope (SE)))
+ then
+ return True;
+
+ -- Else test warnings off
+
+ elsif Warnings_Off_Check_Spec (S) then
+ return True;
+
+ -- All tests for suppressing warning failed
+
+ else
+ return False;
+ end if;
+ end No_Warn_On_In_Out;
+
+ -- Start of processing for Output_Non_Modified_In_Out_Warnings
+
+ begin
+ -- Loop through entities for which a warning may be needed
+
+ for J in In_Out_Warnings.First .. In_Out_Warnings.Last loop
+ declare
+ E1 : constant Entity_Id := In_Out_Warnings.Table (J);
+
+ begin
+ -- Suppress warning in specific cases (see details in comments for
+ -- No_Warn_On_In_Out), or if there is a pragma Unmodified.
+
+ if Has_Pragma_Unmodified_Check_Spec (E1)
+ or else No_Warn_On_In_Out (E1)
+ then
+ null;
+
+ -- Here we generate the warning
+
+ else
+ -- If -gnatwc is set then output message that we could be IN
+
+ if not Is_Trivial_Subprogram (Scope (E1)) then
+ if Warn_On_Constant then
+ Error_Msg_N
+ ("?u?formal parameter & is not modified!", E1);
+ Error_Msg_N
+ ("\?u?mode could be IN instead of `IN OUT`!", E1);
+
+ -- We do not generate warnings for IN OUT parameters
+ -- unless we have at least -gnatwu. This is deliberately
+ -- inconsistent with the treatment of variables, but
+ -- otherwise we get too many unexpected warnings in
+ -- default mode.
+
+ elsif Check_Unreferenced then
+ Error_Msg_N
+ ("?u?formal parameter& is read but "
+ & "never assigned!", E1);
+ end if;
+ end if;
+
+ -- Kill any other warnings on this entity, since this is the
+ -- one that should dominate any other unreferenced warning.
+
+ Set_Warnings_Off (E1);
+ end if;
+ end;
+ end loop;
+ end Output_Non_Modified_In_Out_Warnings;
+
+ ----------------------------------------
+ -- Output_Obsolescent_Entity_Warnings --
+ ----------------------------------------
+
+ procedure Output_Obsolescent_Entity_Warnings (N : Node_Id; E : Entity_Id) is
+ P : constant Node_Id := Parent (N);
+ S : Entity_Id;
+
+ begin
+ S := Current_Scope;
+
+ -- Do not output message if we are the scope of standard. This means
+ -- we have a reference from a context clause from when it is originally
+ -- processed, and that's too early to tell whether it is an obsolescent
+ -- unit doing the with'ing. In Sem_Ch10.Analyze_Compilation_Unit we make
+ -- sure that we have a later call when the scope is available. This test
+ -- also eliminates all messages for use clauses, which is fine (we do
+ -- not want messages for use clauses, since they are always redundant
+ -- with respect to the associated with clause).
+
+ if S = Standard_Standard then
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ -- Do not output message if we are in scope of an obsolescent package
+ -- or subprogram.
+
+ loop
+ if Is_Obsolescent (S) then
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ S := Scope (S);
+ exit when S = Standard_Standard;
+ end loop;
+
+ -- Here we will output the message
+
+ Error_Msg_Sloc := Sloc (E);
+
+ -- Case of with clause
+
+ if Nkind (P) = N_With_Clause then
+ if Ekind (E) = E_Package then
+ Error_Msg_NE
+ ("??with of obsolescent package& declared#", N, E);
+ elsif Ekind (E) = E_Procedure then
+ Error_Msg_NE
+ ("??with of obsolescent procedure& declared#", N, E);
+ else
+ Error_Msg_NE
+ ("??with of obsolescent function& declared#", N, E);
+ end if;
+
+ -- If we do not have a with clause, then ignore any reference to an
+ -- obsolescent package name. We only want to give the one warning of
+ -- withing the package, not one each time it is used to qualify.
+
+ elsif Ekind (E) = E_Package then
+ return;
+
+ -- Procedure call statement
+
+ elsif Nkind (P) = N_Procedure_Call_Statement then
+ Error_Msg_NE
+ ("??call to obsolescent procedure& declared#", N, E);
+
+ -- Function call
+
+ elsif Nkind (P) = N_Function_Call then
+ Error_Msg_NE
+ ("??call to obsolescent function& declared#", N, E);
+
+ -- Reference to obsolescent type
+
+ elsif Is_Type (E) then
+ Error_Msg_NE
+ ("??reference to obsolescent type& declared#", N, E);
+
+ -- Reference to obsolescent component
+
+ elsif Ekind_In (E, E_Component, E_Discriminant) then
+ Error_Msg_NE
+ ("??reference to obsolescent component& declared#", N, E);
+
+ -- Reference to obsolescent variable
+
+ elsif Ekind (E) = E_Variable then
+ Error_Msg_NE
+ ("??reference to obsolescent variable& declared#", N, E);
+
+ -- Reference to obsolescent constant
+
+ elsif Ekind (E) = E_Constant or else Ekind (E) in Named_Kind then
+ Error_Msg_NE
+ ("??reference to obsolescent constant& declared#", N, E);
+
+ -- Reference to obsolescent enumeration literal
+
+ elsif Ekind (E) = E_Enumeration_Literal then
+ Error_Msg_NE
+ ("??reference to obsolescent enumeration literal& declared#", N, E);
+
+ -- Generic message for any other case we missed
+
+ else
+ Error_Msg_NE
+ ("??reference to obsolescent entity& declared#", N, E);
+ end if;
+
+ -- Output additional warning if present
+
+ for J in Obsolescent_Warnings.First .. Obsolescent_Warnings.Last loop
+ if Obsolescent_Warnings.Table (J).Ent = E then
+ String_To_Name_Buffer (Obsolescent_Warnings.Table (J).Msg);
+ Error_Msg_Strlen := Name_Len;
+ Error_Msg_String (1 .. Name_Len) := Name_Buffer (1 .. Name_Len);
+ Error_Msg_N ("\\??~", N);
+ exit;
+ end if;
+ end loop;
+ end Output_Obsolescent_Entity_Warnings;
+
+ ----------------------------------
+ -- Output_Unreferenced_Messages --
+ ----------------------------------
+
+ procedure Output_Unreferenced_Messages is
+ begin
+ for J in Unreferenced_Entities.First ..
+ Unreferenced_Entities.Last
+ loop
+ Warn_On_Unreferenced_Entity (Unreferenced_Entities.Table (J));
+ end loop;
+ end Output_Unreferenced_Messages;
+
+ -----------------------------------------
+ -- Output_Unused_Warnings_Off_Warnings --
+ -----------------------------------------
+
+ procedure Output_Unused_Warnings_Off_Warnings is
+ begin
+ for J in Warnings_Off_Pragmas.First .. Warnings_Off_Pragmas.Last loop
+ declare
+ Wentry : Warnings_Off_Entry renames Warnings_Off_Pragmas.Table (J);
+ N : Node_Id renames Wentry.N;
+ E : Node_Id renames Wentry.E;
+
+ begin
+ -- Turn off Warnings_Off, or we won't get the warning!
+
+ Set_Warnings_Off (E, False);
+
+ -- Nothing to do if pragma was used to suppress a general warning
+
+ if Warnings_Off_Used (E) then
+ null;
+
+ -- If pragma was used both in unmodified and unreferenced contexts
+ -- then that's as good as the general case, no warning.
+
+ elsif Warnings_Off_Used_Unmodified (E)
+ and
+ Warnings_Off_Used_Unreferenced (E)
+ then
+ null;
+
+ -- Used only in context where Unmodified would have worked
+
+ elsif Warnings_Off_Used_Unmodified (E) then
+ Error_Msg_NE
+ ("?W?could use Unmodified instead of "
+ & "Warnings Off for &", Pragma_Identifier (N), E);
+
+ -- Used only in context where Unreferenced would have worked
+
+ elsif Warnings_Off_Used_Unreferenced (E) then
+ Error_Msg_NE
+ ("?W?could use Unreferenced instead of "
+ & "Warnings Off for &", Pragma_Identifier (N), E);
+
+ -- Not used at all
+
+ else
+ Error_Msg_NE
+ ("?W?pragma Warnings Off for & unused, "
+ & "could be omitted", N, E);
+ end if;
+ end;
+ end loop;
+ end Output_Unused_Warnings_Off_Warnings;
+
+ ---------------------------
+ -- Referenced_Check_Spec --
+ ---------------------------
+
+ function Referenced_Check_Spec (E : Entity_Id) return Boolean is
+ begin
+ if Is_Formal (E) and then Present (Spec_Entity (E)) then
+ return Referenced (E) or else Referenced (Spec_Entity (E));
+ else
+ return Referenced (E);
+ end if;
+ end Referenced_Check_Spec;
+
+ ----------------------------------
+ -- Referenced_As_LHS_Check_Spec --
+ ----------------------------------
+
+ function Referenced_As_LHS_Check_Spec (E : Entity_Id) return Boolean is
+ begin
+ if Is_Formal (E) and then Present (Spec_Entity (E)) then
+ return Referenced_As_LHS (E)
+ or else Referenced_As_LHS (Spec_Entity (E));
+ else
+ return Referenced_As_LHS (E);
+ end if;
+ end Referenced_As_LHS_Check_Spec;
+
+ --------------------------------------------
+ -- Referenced_As_Out_Parameter_Check_Spec --
+ --------------------------------------------
+
+ function Referenced_As_Out_Parameter_Check_Spec
+ (E : Entity_Id) return Boolean
+ is
+ begin
+ if Is_Formal (E) and then Present (Spec_Entity (E)) then
+ return Referenced_As_Out_Parameter (E)
+ or else Referenced_As_Out_Parameter (Spec_Entity (E));
+ else
+ return Referenced_As_Out_Parameter (E);
+ end if;
+ end Referenced_As_Out_Parameter_Check_Spec;
+
+ -----------------------------
+ -- Warn_On_Known_Condition --
+ -----------------------------
+
+ procedure Warn_On_Known_Condition (C : Node_Id) is
+ P : Node_Id;
+ Orig : constant Node_Id := Original_Node (C);
+ Test_Result : Boolean;
+
+ function Is_Known_Branch return Boolean;
+ -- If the type of the condition is Boolean, the constant value of the
+ -- condition is a boolean literal. If the type is a derived boolean
+ -- type, the constant is wrapped in a type conversion of the derived
+ -- literal. If the value of the condition is not a literal, no warnings
+ -- can be produced. This function returns True if the result can be
+ -- determined, and Test_Result is set True/False accordingly. Otherwise
+ -- False is returned, and Test_Result is unchanged.
+
+ procedure Track (N : Node_Id; Loc : Node_Id);
+ -- Adds continuation warning(s) pointing to reason (assignment or test)
+ -- for the operand of the conditional having a known value (or at least
+ -- enough is known about the value to issue the warning). N is the node
+ -- which is judged to have a known value. Loc is the warning location.
+
+ ---------------------
+ -- Is_Known_Branch --
+ ---------------------
+
+ function Is_Known_Branch return Boolean is
+ begin
+ if Etype (C) = Standard_Boolean
+ and then Is_Entity_Name (C)
+ and then
+ (Entity (C) = Standard_False or else Entity (C) = Standard_True)
+ then
+ Test_Result := Entity (C) = Standard_True;
+ return True;
+
+ elsif Is_Boolean_Type (Etype (C))
+ and then Nkind (C) = N_Unchecked_Type_Conversion
+ and then Is_Entity_Name (Expression (C))
+ and then Ekind (Entity (Expression (C))) = E_Enumeration_Literal
+ then
+ Test_Result :=
+ Chars (Entity (Expression (C))) = Chars (Standard_True);
+ return True;
+
+ else
+ return False;
+ end if;
+ end Is_Known_Branch;
+
+ -----------
+ -- Track --
+ -----------
+
+ procedure Track (N : Node_Id; Loc : Node_Id) is
+ Nod : constant Node_Id := Original_Node (N);
+
+ begin
+ if Nkind (Nod) in N_Op_Compare then
+ Track (Left_Opnd (Nod), Loc);
+ Track (Right_Opnd (Nod), Loc);
+
+ elsif Is_Entity_Name (Nod)
+ and then Is_Object (Entity (Nod))
+ then
+ declare
+ CV : constant Node_Id := Current_Value (Entity (Nod));
+
+ begin
+ if Present (CV) then
+ Error_Msg_Sloc := Sloc (CV);
+
+ if Nkind (CV) not in N_Subexpr then
+ Error_Msg_N ("\\?(see test #)", Loc);
+
+ elsif Nkind (Parent (CV)) =
+ N_Case_Statement_Alternative
+ then
+ Error_Msg_N ("\\?(see case alternative #)", Loc);
+
+ else
+ Error_Msg_N ("\\?(see assignment #)", Loc);
+ end if;
+ end if;
+ end;
+ end if;
+ end Track;
+
+ -- Start of processing for Warn_On_Known_Condition
+
+ begin
+ -- Adjust SCO condition if from source
+
+ if Generate_SCO
+ and then Comes_From_Source (Orig)
+ and then Is_Known_Branch
+ then
+ declare
+ Atrue : Boolean;
+
+ begin
+ Atrue := Test_Result;
+
+ if Present (Parent (C)) and then Nkind (Parent (C)) = N_Op_Not then
+ Atrue := not Atrue;
+ end if;
+
+ Set_SCO_Condition (Orig, Atrue);
+ end;
+ end if;
+
+ -- Argument replacement in an inlined body can make conditions static.
+ -- Do not emit warnings in this case.
+
+ if In_Inlined_Body then
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ if Constant_Condition_Warnings
+ and then Is_Known_Branch
+ and then Comes_From_Source (Orig)
+ and then not In_Instance
+ then
+ -- Don't warn if comparison of result of attribute against a constant
+ -- value, since this is likely legitimate conditional compilation.
+
+ if Nkind (Orig) in N_Op_Compare
+ and then Compile_Time_Known_Value (Right_Opnd (Orig))
+ and then Nkind (Original_Node (Left_Opnd (Orig))) =
+ N_Attribute_Reference
+ then
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ -- See if this is in a statement or a declaration
+
+ P := Parent (C);
+ loop
+ -- If tree is not attached, do not issue warning (this is very
+ -- peculiar, and probably arises from some other error condition)
+
+ if No (P) then
+ return;
+
+ -- If we are in a declaration, then no warning, since in practice
+ -- conditionals in declarations are used for intended tests which
+ -- may be known at compile time, e.g. things like
+
+ -- x : constant Integer := 2 + (Word'Size = 32);
+
+ -- And a warning is annoying in such cases
+
+ elsif Nkind (P) in N_Declaration
+ or else
+ Nkind (P) in N_Later_Decl_Item
+ then
+ return;
+
+ -- Don't warn in assert or check pragma, since presumably tests in
+ -- such a context are very definitely intended, and might well be
+ -- known at compile time. Note that we have to test the original
+ -- node, since assert pragmas get rewritten at analysis time.
+
+ elsif Nkind (Original_Node (P)) = N_Pragma
+ and then (Pragma_Name (Original_Node (P)) = Name_Assert
+ or else
+ Pragma_Name (Original_Node (P)) = Name_Check)
+ then
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ exit when Is_Statement (P);
+ P := Parent (P);
+ end loop;
+
+ -- Here we issue the warning unless some sub-operand has warnings
+ -- set off, in which case we suppress the warning for the node. If
+ -- the original expression is an inequality, it has been expanded
+ -- into a negation, and the value of the original expression is the
+ -- negation of the equality. If the expression is an entity that
+ -- appears within a negation, it is clearer to flag the negation
+ -- itself, and report on its constant value.
+
+ if not Operand_Has_Warnings_Suppressed (C) then
+ declare
+ True_Branch : Boolean := Test_Result;
+ Cond : Node_Id := C;
+
+ begin
+ if Present (Parent (C))
+ and then Nkind (Parent (C)) = N_Op_Not
+ then
+ True_Branch := not True_Branch;
+ Cond := Parent (C);
+ end if;
+
+ if True_Branch then
+ if Is_Entity_Name (Original_Node (C))
+ and then Nkind (Cond) /= N_Op_Not
+ then
+ Error_Msg_NE
+ ("object & is always True?c?", Cond, Original_Node (C));
+ Track (Original_Node (C), Cond);
+
+ else
+ Error_Msg_N ("condition is always True?c?", Cond);
+ Track (Cond, Cond);
+ end if;
+
+ else
+ Error_Msg_N ("condition is always False?c?", Cond);
+ Track (Cond, Cond);
+ end if;
+ end;
+ end if;
+ end if;
+ end Warn_On_Known_Condition;
+
+ ---------------------------------------
+ -- Warn_On_Modified_As_Out_Parameter --
+ ---------------------------------------
+
+ function Warn_On_Modified_As_Out_Parameter (E : Entity_Id) return Boolean is
+ begin
+ return
+ (Warn_On_Modified_Unread and then Is_Only_Out_Parameter (E))
+ or else Warn_On_All_Unread_Out_Parameters;
+ end Warn_On_Modified_As_Out_Parameter;
+
+ ---------------------------------
+ -- Warn_On_Overlapping_Actuals --
+ ---------------------------------
+
+ procedure Warn_On_Overlapping_Actuals (Subp : Entity_Id; N : Node_Id) is
+ Act1, Act2 : Node_Id;
+ Form1, Form2 : Entity_Id;
+
+ function Is_Covered_Formal (Formal : Node_Id) return Boolean;
+ -- Return True if Formal is covered by the rule
+
+ function Refer_Same_Object (Act1, Act2 : Node_Id) return Boolean;
+ -- Two names are known to refer to the same object if the two names
+ -- are known to denote the same object; or one of the names is a
+ -- selected_component, indexed_component, or slice and its prefix is
+ -- known to refer to the same object as the other name; or one of the
+ -- two names statically denotes a renaming declaration whose renamed
+ -- object_name is known to refer to the same object as the other name
+ -- (RM 6.4.1(6.11/3))
+
+ -----------------------
+ -- Refer_Same_Object --
+ -----------------------
+
+ function Refer_Same_Object (Act1, Act2 : Node_Id) return Boolean is
+ begin
+ return Denotes_Same_Object (Act1, Act2)
+ or else Denotes_Same_Prefix (Act1, Act2);
+ end Refer_Same_Object;
+
+ -----------------------
+ -- Is_Covered_Formal --
+ -----------------------
+
+ function Is_Covered_Formal (Formal : Node_Id) return Boolean is
+ begin
+ return
+ Ekind_In (Formal, E_Out_Parameter, E_In_Out_Parameter)
+ and then (Is_Elementary_Type (Etype (Formal))
+ or else Is_Record_Type (Etype (Formal))
+ or else Is_Array_Type (Etype (Formal)));
+ end Is_Covered_Formal;
+
+ begin
+ if Ada_Version < Ada_2012 and then not Warn_On_Overlap then
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ -- Exclude calls rewritten as enumeration literals
+
+ if Nkind (N) not in N_Subprogram_Call
+ and then Nkind (N) /= N_Entry_Call_Statement
+ then
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ -- If a call C has two or more parameters of mode in out or out that are
+ -- of an elementary type, then the call is legal only if for each name
+ -- N that is passed as a parameter of mode in out or out to the call C,
+ -- there is no other name among the other parameters of mode in out or
+ -- out to C that is known to denote the same object (RM 6.4.1(6.15/3))
+
+ -- If appropriate warning switch is set, we also report warnings on
+ -- overlapping parameters that are record types or array types.
+
+ Form1 := First_Formal (Subp);
+ Act1 := First_Actual (N);
+ while Present (Form1) and then Present (Act1) loop
+ if Is_Covered_Formal (Form1) then
+ Form2 := First_Formal (Subp);
+ Act2 := First_Actual (N);
+ while Present (Form2) and then Present (Act2) loop
+ if Form1 /= Form2
+ and then Is_Covered_Formal (Form2)
+ and then Refer_Same_Object (Act1, Act2)
+ then
+ -- Guard against previous errors
+
+ if Error_Posted (N)
+ or else No (Etype (Act1))
+ or else No (Etype (Act2))
+ then
+ null;
+
+ -- If the actual is a function call in prefix notation,
+ -- there is no real overlap.
+
+ elsif Nkind (Act2) = N_Function_Call then
+ null;
+
+ -- If type is not by-copy, assume that aliasing is intended
+
+ elsif
+ Present (Underlying_Type (Etype (Form1)))
+ and then
+ (Is_By_Reference_Type (Underlying_Type (Etype (Form1)))
+ or else
+ Convention (Underlying_Type (Etype (Form1))) =
+ Convention_Ada_Pass_By_Reference)
+ then
+ null;
+
+ -- Under Ada 2012 we only report warnings on overlapping
+ -- arrays and record types if switch is set.
+
+ elsif Ada_Version >= Ada_2012
+ and then not Is_Elementary_Type (Etype (Form1))
+ and then not Warn_On_Overlap
+ then
+ null;
+
+ -- Here we may need to issue message
+
+ else
+ Error_Msg_Warn :=
+ Ada_Version < Ada_2012
+ or else not Is_Elementary_Type (Etype (Form1));
+
+ declare
+ Act : Node_Id;
+ Form : Entity_Id;
+
+ begin
+ -- Find matching actual
+
+ Act := First_Actual (N);
+ Form := First_Formal (Subp);
+ while Act /= Act2 loop
+ Next_Formal (Form);
+ Next_Actual (Act);
+ end loop;
+
+ if Is_Elementary_Type (Etype (Act1))
+ and then Ekind (Form2) = E_In_Parameter
+ then
+ null; -- No real aliasing
+
+ elsif Is_Elementary_Type (Etype (Act2))
+ and then Ekind (Form2) = E_In_Parameter
+ then
+ null; -- Ditto
+
+ -- If the call was written in prefix notation, and
+ -- thus its prefix before rewriting was a selected
+ -- component, count only visible actuals in the call.
+
+ elsif Is_Entity_Name (First_Actual (N))
+ and then Nkind (Original_Node (N)) = Nkind (N)
+ and then Nkind (Name (Original_Node (N))) =
+ N_Selected_Component
+ and then
+ Is_Entity_Name (Prefix (Name (Original_Node (N))))
+ and then
+ Entity (Prefix (Name (Original_Node (N)))) =
+ Entity (First_Actual (N))
+ then
+ if Act1 = First_Actual (N) then
+ Error_Msg_FE
+ ("`IN OUT` prefix overlaps with "
+ & "actual for&?I?", Act1, Form);
+
+ else
+ -- For greater clarity, give name of formal
+
+ Error_Msg_Node_2 := Form;
+ Error_Msg_FE
+ ("writable actual for & overlaps with "
+ & "actual for&?I?", Act1, Form);
+ end if;
+
+ else
+ Error_Msg_Node_2 := Form;
+ Error_Msg_FE
+ ("writable actual for & overlaps with "
+ & "actual for&?I?", Act1, Form1);
+ end if;
+ end;
+ end if;
+
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ Next_Formal (Form2);
+ Next_Actual (Act2);
+ end loop;
+ end if;
+
+ Next_Formal (Form1);
+ Next_Actual (Act1);
+ end loop;
+ end Warn_On_Overlapping_Actuals;
+
+ ------------------------------
+ -- Warn_On_Suspicious_Index --
+ ------------------------------
+
+ procedure Warn_On_Suspicious_Index (Name : Entity_Id; X : Node_Id) is
+
+ Low_Bound : Uint;
+ -- Set to lower bound for a suspicious type
+
+ Ent : Entity_Id;
+ -- Entity for array reference
+
+ Typ : Entity_Id;
+ -- Array type
+
+ function Is_Suspicious_Type (Typ : Entity_Id) return Boolean;
+ -- Tests to see if Typ is a type for which we may have a suspicious
+ -- index, namely an unconstrained array type, whose lower bound is
+ -- either zero or one. If so, True is returned, and Low_Bound is set
+ -- to this lower bound. If not, False is returned, and Low_Bound is
+ -- undefined on return.
+ --
+ -- For now, we limit this to standard string types, so any other
+ -- unconstrained types return False. We may change our minds on this
+ -- later on, but strings seem the most important case.
+
+ procedure Test_Suspicious_Index;
+ -- Test if index is of suspicious type and if so, generate warning
+
+ ------------------------
+ -- Is_Suspicious_Type --
+ ------------------------
+
+ function Is_Suspicious_Type (Typ : Entity_Id) return Boolean is
+ LB : Node_Id;
+
+ begin
+ if Is_Array_Type (Typ)
+ and then not Is_Constrained (Typ)
+ and then Number_Dimensions (Typ) = 1
+ and then (Root_Type (Typ) = Standard_String
+ or else
+ Root_Type (Typ) = Standard_Wide_String
+ or else
+ Root_Type (Typ) = Standard_Wide_Wide_String)
+ and then not Has_Warnings_Off (Typ)
+ then
+ LB := Type_Low_Bound (Etype (First_Index (Typ)));
+
+ if Compile_Time_Known_Value (LB) then
+ Low_Bound := Expr_Value (LB);
+ return Low_Bound = Uint_0 or else Low_Bound = Uint_1;
+ end if;
+ end if;
+
+ return False;
+ end Is_Suspicious_Type;
+
+ ---------------------------
+ -- Test_Suspicious_Index --
+ ---------------------------
+
+ procedure Test_Suspicious_Index is
+
+ function Length_Reference (N : Node_Id) return Boolean;
+ -- Check if node N is of the form Name'Length
+
+ procedure Warn1;
+ -- Generate first warning line
+
+ ----------------------
+ -- Length_Reference --
+ ----------------------
+
+ function Length_Reference (N : Node_Id) return Boolean is
+ R : constant Node_Id := Original_Node (N);
+ begin
+ return
+ Nkind (R) = N_Attribute_Reference
+ and then Attribute_Name (R) = Name_Length
+ and then Is_Entity_Name (Prefix (R))
+ and then Entity (Prefix (R)) = Ent;
+ end Length_Reference;
+
+ -----------
+ -- Warn1 --
+ -----------
+
+ procedure Warn1 is
+ begin
+ Error_Msg_Uint_1 := Low_Bound;
+ Error_Msg_FE -- CODEFIX
+ ("?w?index for& may assume lower bound of^", X, Ent);
+ end Warn1;
+
+ -- Start of processing for Test_Suspicious_Index
+
+ begin
+ -- Nothing to do if subscript does not come from source (we don't
+ -- want to give garbage warnings on compiler expanded code, e.g. the
+ -- loops generated for slice assignments. Such junk warnings would
+ -- be placed on source constructs with no subscript in sight!)
+
+ if not Comes_From_Source (Original_Node (X)) then
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ -- Case where subscript is a constant integer
+
+ if Nkind (X) = N_Integer_Literal then
+ Warn1;
+
+ -- Case where original form of subscript is an integer literal
+
+ if Nkind (Original_Node (X)) = N_Integer_Literal then
+ if Intval (X) = Low_Bound then
+ Error_Msg_FE -- CODEFIX
+ ("\?w?suggested replacement: `&''First`", X, Ent);
+ else
+ Error_Msg_Uint_1 := Intval (X) - Low_Bound;
+ Error_Msg_FE -- CODEFIX
+ ("\?w?suggested replacement: `&''First + ^`", X, Ent);
+
+ end if;
+
+ -- Case where original form of subscript is more complex
+
+ else
+ -- Build string X'First - 1 + expression where the expression
+ -- is the original subscript. If the expression starts with "1
+ -- + ", then the "- 1 + 1" is elided.
+
+ Error_Msg_String (1 .. 13) := "'First - 1 + ";
+ Error_Msg_Strlen := 13;
+
+ declare
+ Sref : Source_Ptr := Sloc (First_Node (Original_Node (X)));
+ Tref : constant Source_Buffer_Ptr :=
+ Source_Text (Get_Source_File_Index (Sref));
+ -- Tref (Sref) is used to scan the subscript
+
+ Pctr : Natural;
+ -- Parentheses counter when scanning subscript
+
+ begin
+ -- Tref (Sref) points to start of subscript
+
+ -- Elide - 1 if subscript starts with 1 +
+
+ if Tref (Sref .. Sref + 2) = "1 +" then
+ Error_Msg_Strlen := Error_Msg_Strlen - 6;
+ Sref := Sref + 2;
+
+ elsif Tref (Sref .. Sref + 1) = "1+" then
+ Error_Msg_Strlen := Error_Msg_Strlen - 6;
+ Sref := Sref + 1;
+ end if;
+
+ -- Now we will copy the subscript to the string buffer
+
+ Pctr := 0;
+ loop
+ -- Count parens, exit if terminating right paren. Note
+ -- check to ignore paren appearing as character literal.
+
+ if Tref (Sref + 1) = '''
+ and then
+ Tref (Sref - 1) = '''
+ then
+ null;
+ else
+ if Tref (Sref) = '(' then
+ Pctr := Pctr + 1;
+ elsif Tref (Sref) = ')' then
+ exit when Pctr = 0;
+ Pctr := Pctr - 1;
+ end if;
+ end if;
+
+ -- Done if terminating double dot (slice case)
+
+ exit when Pctr = 0
+ and then (Tref (Sref .. Sref + 1) = ".."
+ or else
+ Tref (Sref .. Sref + 2) = " ..");
+
+ -- Quit if we have hit EOF character, something wrong
+
+ if Tref (Sref) = EOF then
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ -- String literals are too much of a pain to handle
+
+ if Tref (Sref) = '"' or else Tref (Sref) = '%' then
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ -- If we have a 'Range reference, then this is a case
+ -- where we cannot easily give a replacement. Don't try!
+
+ if Tref (Sref .. Sref + 4) = "range"
+ and then Tref (Sref - 1) < 'A'
+ and then Tref (Sref + 5) < 'A'
+ then
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ -- Else store next character
+
+ Error_Msg_Strlen := Error_Msg_Strlen + 1;
+ Error_Msg_String (Error_Msg_Strlen) := Tref (Sref);
+ Sref := Sref + 1;
+
+ -- If we get more than 40 characters then the expression
+ -- is too long to copy, or something has gone wrong. In
+ -- either case, just skip the attempt at a suggested fix.
+
+ if Error_Msg_Strlen > 40 then
+ return;
+ end if;
+ end loop;
+ end;
+
+ -- Replacement subscript is now in string buffer
+
+ Error_Msg_FE -- CODEFIX
+ ("\?w?suggested replacement: `&~`", Original_Node (X), Ent);
+ end if;
+
+ -- Case where subscript is of the form X'Length
+
+ elsif Length_Reference (X) then
+ Warn1;
+ Error_Msg_Node_2 := Ent;
+ Error_Msg_FE
+ ("\?w?suggest replacement of `&''Length` by `&''Last`",
+ X, Ent);
+
+ -- Case where subscript is of the form X'Length - expression
+
+ elsif Nkind (X) = N_Op_Subtract
+ and then Length_Reference (Left_Opnd (X))
+ then
+ Warn1;
+ Error_Msg_Node_2 := Ent;
+ Error_Msg_FE
+ ("\?w?suggest replacement of `&''Length` by `&''Last`",
+ Left_Opnd (X), Ent);
+ end if;
+ end Test_Suspicious_Index;
+
+ -- Start of processing for Warn_On_Suspicious_Index
+
+ begin
+ -- Only process if warnings activated
+
+ if Warn_On_Assumed_Low_Bound then
+
+ -- Test if array is simple entity name
+
+ if Is_Entity_Name (Name) then
+
+ -- Test if array is parameter of unconstrained string type
+
+ Ent := Entity (Name);
+ Typ := Etype (Ent);
+
+ if Is_Formal (Ent)
+ and then Is_Suspicious_Type (Typ)
+ and then not Low_Bound_Tested (Ent)
+ then
+ Test_Suspicious_Index;
+ end if;
+ end if;
+ end if;
+ end Warn_On_Suspicious_Index;
+
+ --------------------------------------
+ -- Warn_On_Unassigned_Out_Parameter --
+ --------------------------------------
+
+ procedure Warn_On_Unassigned_Out_Parameter
+ (Return_Node : Node_Id;
+ Scope_Id : Entity_Id)
+ is
+ Form : Entity_Id;
+ Form2 : Entity_Id;
+
+ begin
+ -- Ignore if procedure or return statement does not come from source
+
+ if not Comes_From_Source (Scope_Id)
+ or else not Comes_From_Source (Return_Node)
+ then
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ -- Loop through formals
+
+ Form := First_Formal (Scope_Id);
+ while Present (Form) loop
+
+ -- We are only interested in OUT parameters that come from source
+ -- and are never set in the source, and furthermore only in scalars
+ -- since non-scalars generate too many false positives.
+
+ if Ekind (Form) = E_Out_Parameter
+ and then Never_Set_In_Source_Check_Spec (Form)
+ and then Is_Scalar_Type (Etype (Form))
+ and then not Present (Unset_Reference (Form))
+ then
+ -- Before we issue the warning, an add ad hoc defence against the
+ -- most common case of false positives with this warning which is
+ -- the case where there is a Boolean OUT parameter that has been
+ -- set, and whose meaning is "ignore the values of the other
+ -- parameters". We can't of course reliably tell this case at
+ -- compile time, but the following test kills a lot of false
+ -- positives, without generating a significant number of false
+ -- negatives (missed real warnings).
+
+ Form2 := First_Formal (Scope_Id);
+ while Present (Form2) loop
+ if Ekind (Form2) = E_Out_Parameter
+ and then Root_Type (Etype (Form2)) = Standard_Boolean
+ and then not Never_Set_In_Source_Check_Spec (Form2)
+ then
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ Next_Formal (Form2);
+ end loop;
+
+ -- Here all conditions are met, record possible unset reference
+
+ Set_Unset_Reference (Form, Return_Node);
+ end if;
+
+ Next_Formal (Form);
+ end loop;
+ end Warn_On_Unassigned_Out_Parameter;
+
+ ---------------------------------
+ -- Warn_On_Unreferenced_Entity --
+ ---------------------------------
+
+ procedure Warn_On_Unreferenced_Entity
+ (Spec_E : Entity_Id;
+ Body_E : Entity_Id := Empty)
+ is
+ E : Entity_Id := Spec_E;
+
+ begin
+ if not Referenced_Check_Spec (E)
+ and then not Has_Pragma_Unreferenced_Check_Spec (E)
+ and then not Warnings_Off_Check_Spec (E)
+ then
+ case Ekind (E) is
+ when E_Variable =>
+
+ -- Case of variable that is assigned but not read. We suppress
+ -- the message if the variable is volatile, has an address
+ -- clause, is aliased, or is a renaming, or is imported.
+
+ if Referenced_As_LHS_Check_Spec (E)
+ and then No (Address_Clause (E))
+ and then not Is_Volatile (E)
+ then
+ if Warn_On_Modified_Unread
+ and then not Is_Imported (E)
+ and then not Is_Aliased (E)
+ and then No (Renamed_Object (E))
+ then
+ if not Has_Pragma_Unmodified_Check_Spec (E) then
+ Error_Msg_N -- CODEFIX
+ ("?u?variable & is assigned but never read!", E);
+ end if;
+
+ Set_Last_Assignment (E, Empty);
+ end if;
+
+ -- Normal case of neither assigned nor read (exclude variables
+ -- referenced as out parameters, since we already generated
+ -- appropriate warnings at the call point in this case).
+
+ elsif not Referenced_As_Out_Parameter (E) then
+
+ -- We suppress the message for types for which a valid
+ -- pragma Unreferenced_Objects has been given, otherwise
+ -- we go ahead and give the message.
+
+ if not Has_Pragma_Unreferenced_Objects (Etype (E)) then
+
+ -- Distinguish renamed case in message
+
+ if Present (Renamed_Object (E))
+ and then Comes_From_Source (Renamed_Object (E))
+ then
+ Error_Msg_N -- CODEFIX
+ ("?u?renamed variable & is not referenced!", E);
+ else
+ Error_Msg_N -- CODEFIX
+ ("?u?variable & is not referenced!", E);
+ end if;
+ end if;
+ end if;
+
+ when E_Constant =>
+ if Present (Renamed_Object (E))
+ and then Comes_From_Source (Renamed_Object (E))
+ then
+ Error_Msg_N -- CODEFIX
+ ("?u?renamed constant & is not referenced!", E);
+ else
+ Error_Msg_N -- CODEFIX
+ ("?u?constant & is not referenced!", E);
+ end if;
+
+ when E_In_Parameter |
+ E_In_Out_Parameter =>
+
+ -- Do not emit message for formals of a renaming, because
+ -- they are never referenced explicitly.
+
+ if Nkind (Original_Node (Unit_Declaration_Node (Scope (E)))) /=
+ N_Subprogram_Renaming_Declaration
+ then
+ -- Suppress this message for an IN OUT parameter of a
+ -- non-scalar type, since it is normal to have only an
+ -- assignment in such a case.
+
+ if Ekind (E) = E_In_Parameter
+ or else not Referenced_As_LHS_Check_Spec (E)
+ or else Is_Scalar_Type (Etype (E))
+ then
+ if Present (Body_E) then
+ E := Body_E;
+ end if;
+
+ if not Is_Trivial_Subprogram (Scope (E)) then
+ Error_Msg_NE -- CODEFIX
+ ("?u?formal parameter & is not referenced!",
+ E, Spec_E);
+ end if;
+ end if;
+ end if;
+
+ when E_Out_Parameter =>
+ null;
+
+ when E_Discriminant =>
+ Error_Msg_N ("?u?discriminant & is not referenced!", E);
+
+ when E_Named_Integer |
+ E_Named_Real =>
+ Error_Msg_N -- CODEFIX
+ ("?u?named number & is not referenced!", E);
+
+ when Formal_Object_Kind =>
+ Error_Msg_N -- CODEFIX
+ ("?u?formal object & is not referenced!", E);
+
+ when E_Enumeration_Literal =>
+ Error_Msg_N -- CODEFIX
+ ("?u?literal & is not referenced!", E);
+
+ when E_Function =>
+ Error_Msg_N -- CODEFIX
+ ("?u?function & is not referenced!", E);
+
+ when E_Procedure =>
+ Error_Msg_N -- CODEFIX
+ ("?u?procedure & is not referenced!", E);
+
+ when E_Package =>
+ Error_Msg_N -- CODEFIX
+ ("?u?package & is not referenced!", E);
+
+ when E_Exception =>
+ Error_Msg_N -- CODEFIX
+ ("?u?exception & is not referenced!", E);
+
+ when E_Label =>
+ Error_Msg_N -- CODEFIX
+ ("?u?label & is not referenced!", E);
+
+ when E_Generic_Procedure =>
+ Error_Msg_N -- CODEFIX
+ ("?u?generic procedure & is never instantiated!", E);
+
+ when E_Generic_Function =>
+ Error_Msg_N -- CODEFIX
+ ("?u?generic function & is never instantiated!", E);
+
+ when Type_Kind =>
+ Error_Msg_N -- CODEFIX
+ ("?u?type & is not referenced!", E);
+
+ when others =>
+ Error_Msg_N -- CODEFIX
+ ("?u?& is not referenced!", E);
+ end case;
+
+ -- Kill warnings on the entity on which the message has been posted
+
+ Set_Warnings_Off (E);
+ end if;
+ end Warn_On_Unreferenced_Entity;
+
+ --------------------------------
+ -- Warn_On_Useless_Assignment --
+ --------------------------------
+
+ procedure Warn_On_Useless_Assignment
+ (Ent : Entity_Id;
+ N : Node_Id := Empty)
+ is
+ P : Node_Id;
+ X : Node_Id;
+
+ function Check_Ref (N : Node_Id) return Traverse_Result;
+ -- Used to instantiate Traverse_Func. Returns Abandon if a reference to
+ -- the entity in question is found.
+
+ function Test_No_Refs is new Traverse_Func (Check_Ref);
+
+ ---------------
+ -- Check_Ref --
+ ---------------
+
+ function Check_Ref (N : Node_Id) return Traverse_Result is
+ begin
+ -- Check reference to our identifier. We use name equality here
+ -- because the exception handlers have not yet been analyzed. This
+ -- is not quite right, but it really does not matter that we fail
+ -- to output the warning in some obscure cases of name clashes.
+
+ if Nkind (N) = N_Identifier
+ and then Chars (N) = Chars (Ent)
+ then
+ return Abandon;
+ else
+ return OK;
+ end if;
+ end Check_Ref;
+
+ -- Start of processing for Warn_On_Useless_Assignment
+
+ begin
+ -- Check if this is a case we want to warn on, a scalar or access
+ -- variable with the last assignment field set, with warnings enabled,
+ -- and which is not imported or exported. We also check that it is OK
+ -- to capture the value. We are not going to capture any value, but
+ -- the warning message depends on the same kind of conditions.
+
+ if Is_Assignable (Ent)
+ and then not Is_Return_Object (Ent)
+ and then Present (Last_Assignment (Ent))
+ and then not Is_Imported (Ent)
+ and then not Is_Exported (Ent)
+ and then Safe_To_Capture_Value (N, Ent)
+ and then not Has_Pragma_Unreferenced_Check_Spec (Ent)
+ then
+ -- Before we issue the message, check covering exception handlers.
+ -- Search up tree for enclosing statement sequences and handlers.
+
+ P := Parent (Last_Assignment (Ent));
+ while Present (P) loop
+
+ -- Something is really wrong if we don't find a handled statement
+ -- sequence, so just suppress the warning.
+
+ if No (P) then
+ Set_Last_Assignment (Ent, Empty);
+ return;
+
+ -- When we hit a package/subprogram body, issue warning and exit
+
+ elsif Nkind (P) = N_Subprogram_Body
+ or else Nkind (P) = N_Package_Body
+ then
+ -- Case of assigned value never referenced
+
+ if No (N) then
+ declare
+ LA : constant Node_Id := Last_Assignment (Ent);
+
+ begin
+ -- Don't give this for OUT and IN OUT formals, since
+ -- clearly caller may reference the assigned value. Also
+ -- never give such warnings for internal variables.
+
+ if Ekind (Ent) = E_Variable
+ and then not Is_Internal_Name (Chars (Ent))
+ then
+ -- Give appropriate message, distinguishing between
+ -- assignment statements and out parameters.
+
+ if Nkind_In (Parent (LA), N_Procedure_Call_Statement,
+ N_Parameter_Association)
+ then
+ Error_Msg_NE
+ ("?m?& modified by call, but value never "
+ & "referenced", LA, Ent);
+
+ else
+ Error_Msg_NE -- CODEFIX
+ ("?m?useless assignment to&, value never "
+ & "referenced!", LA, Ent);
+ end if;
+ end if;
+ end;
+
+ -- Case of assigned value overwritten
+
+ else
+ declare
+ LA : constant Node_Id := Last_Assignment (Ent);
+
+ begin
+ Error_Msg_Sloc := Sloc (N);
+
+ -- Give appropriate message, distinguishing between
+ -- assignment statements and out parameters.
+
+ if Nkind_In (Parent (LA), N_Procedure_Call_Statement,
+ N_Parameter_Association)
+ then
+ Error_Msg_NE
+ ("?m?& modified by call, but value overwritten #!",
+ LA, Ent);
+ else
+ Error_Msg_NE -- CODEFIX
+ ("?m?useless assignment to&, value overwritten #!",
+ LA, Ent);
+ end if;
+ end;
+ end if;
+
+ -- Clear last assignment indication and we are done
+
+ Set_Last_Assignment (Ent, Empty);
+ return;
+
+ -- Enclosing handled sequence of statements
+
+ elsif Nkind (P) = N_Handled_Sequence_Of_Statements then
+
+ -- Check exception handlers present
+
+ if Present (Exception_Handlers (P)) then
+
+ -- If we are not at the top level, we regard an inner
+ -- exception handler as a decisive indicator that we should
+ -- not generate the warning, since the variable in question
+ -- may be accessed after an exception in the outer block.
+
+ if Nkind (Parent (P)) /= N_Subprogram_Body
+ and then Nkind (Parent (P)) /= N_Package_Body
+ then
+ Set_Last_Assignment (Ent, Empty);
+ return;
+
+ -- Otherwise we are at the outer level. An exception
+ -- handler is significant only if it references the
+ -- variable in question, or if the entity in question
+ -- is an OUT or IN OUT parameter, which which case
+ -- the caller can reference it after the exception
+ -- handler completes.
+
+ else
+ if Is_Formal (Ent) then
+ Set_Last_Assignment (Ent, Empty);
+ return;
+
+ else
+ X := First (Exception_Handlers (P));
+ while Present (X) loop
+ if Test_No_Refs (X) = Abandon then
+ Set_Last_Assignment (Ent, Empty);
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ X := Next (X);
+ end loop;
+ end if;
+ end if;
+ end if;
+ end if;
+
+ P := Parent (P);
+ end loop;
+ end if;
+ end Warn_On_Useless_Assignment;
+
+ ---------------------------------
+ -- Warn_On_Useless_Assignments --
+ ---------------------------------
+
+ procedure Warn_On_Useless_Assignments (E : Entity_Id) is
+ Ent : Entity_Id;
+ begin
+ if Warn_On_Modified_Unread
+ and then In_Extended_Main_Source_Unit (E)
+ then
+ Ent := First_Entity (E);
+ while Present (Ent) loop
+ Warn_On_Useless_Assignment (Ent);
+ Next_Entity (Ent);
+ end loop;
+ end if;
+ end Warn_On_Useless_Assignments;
+
+ -----------------------------
+ -- Warnings_Off_Check_Spec --
+ -----------------------------
+
+ function Warnings_Off_Check_Spec (E : Entity_Id) return Boolean is
+ begin
+ if Is_Formal (E) and then Present (Spec_Entity (E)) then
+
+ -- Note: use of OR here instead of OR ELSE is deliberate, we want
+ -- to mess with flags on both entities.
+
+ return Has_Warnings_Off (E)
+ or
+ Has_Warnings_Off (Spec_Entity (E));
+
+ else
+ return Has_Warnings_Off (E);
+ end if;
+ end Warnings_Off_Check_Spec;
+
+end Sem_Warn;