aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/gcc-4.8.3/gcc/ada/sem_ch13.ads
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc-4.8.3/gcc/ada/sem_ch13.ads')
-rw-r--r--gcc-4.8.3/gcc/ada/sem_ch13.ads325
1 files changed, 325 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gcc-4.8.3/gcc/ada/sem_ch13.ads b/gcc-4.8.3/gcc/ada/sem_ch13.ads
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..611f3f1c6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc-4.8.3/gcc/ada/sem_ch13.ads
@@ -0,0 +1,325 @@
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+-- --
+-- GNAT COMPILER COMPONENTS --
+-- --
+-- S E M _ C H 1 3 --
+-- --
+-- S p e c --
+-- --
+-- Copyright (C) 1992-2012, Free Software Foundation, Inc. --
+-- --
+-- GNAT is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under --
+-- terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Soft- --
+-- ware Foundation; either version 3, or (at your option) any later ver- --
+-- sion. GNAT is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITH- --
+-- OUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY --
+-- or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License --
+-- for more details. You should have received a copy of the GNU General --
+-- Public License distributed with GNAT; see file COPYING3. If not, go to --
+-- http://www.gnu.org/licenses for a complete copy of the license. --
+-- --
+-- GNAT was originally developed by the GNAT team at New York University. --
+-- Extensive contributions were provided by Ada Core Technologies Inc. --
+-- --
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+with Table;
+with Types; use Types;
+with Uintp; use Uintp;
+
+package Sem_Ch13 is
+ procedure Analyze_At_Clause (N : Node_Id);
+ procedure Analyze_Attribute_Definition_Clause (N : Node_Id);
+ procedure Analyze_Enumeration_Representation_Clause (N : Node_Id);
+ procedure Analyze_Free_Statement (N : Node_Id);
+ procedure Analyze_Freeze_Entity (N : Node_Id);
+ procedure Analyze_Record_Representation_Clause (N : Node_Id);
+ procedure Analyze_Code_Statement (N : Node_Id);
+
+ procedure Analyze_Aspect_Specifications (N : Node_Id; E : Entity_Id);
+ -- This procedure is called to analyze aspect specifications for node N. E
+ -- is the corresponding entity declared by the declaration node N. Callers
+ -- should check that Has_Aspects (N) is True before calling this routine.
+
+ procedure Adjust_Record_For_Reverse_Bit_Order (R : Entity_Id);
+ -- Called from Freeze where R is a record entity for which reverse bit
+ -- order is specified and there is at least one component clause. Adjusts
+ -- component positions according to either Ada 95 or Ada 2005 (AI-133).
+
+ function Build_Invariant_Procedure_Declaration
+ (Typ : Entity_Id) return Node_Id;
+ -- If a type declaration has a specified invariant aspect, build the
+ -- declaration for the procedure at once, so that calls to it can be
+ -- generated before the body of the invariant procedure is built. This
+ -- is needed in the presence of public expression functions that return
+ -- the type in question.
+
+ procedure Build_Invariant_Procedure (Typ : Entity_Id; N : Node_Id);
+ -- Typ is a private type with invariants (indicated by Has_Invariants being
+ -- set for Typ, indicating the presence of pragma Invariant entries on the
+ -- rep chain, note that Invariant aspects have already been converted to
+ -- pragma Invariant), then this procedure builds the spec and body for the
+ -- corresponding Invariant procedure, inserting them at appropriate points
+ -- in the package specification N. Invariant_Procedure is set for Typ. Note
+ -- that this procedure is called at the end of processing the declarations
+ -- in the visible part (i.e. the right point for visibility analysis of
+ -- the invariant expression).
+
+ procedure Check_Record_Representation_Clause (N : Node_Id);
+ -- This procedure completes the analysis of a record representation clause
+ -- N. It is called at freeze time after adjustment of component clause bit
+ -- positions for possible non-standard bit order. In the case of Ada 2005
+ -- (machine scalar) mode, this adjustment can make substantial changes, so
+ -- some checks, in particular for component overlaps cannot be done at the
+ -- time the record representation clause is first seen, but must be delayed
+ -- till freeze time, and in particular is called after calling the above
+ -- procedure for adjusting record bit positions for reverse bit order.
+
+ procedure Initialize;
+ -- Initialize internal tables for new compilation
+
+ procedure Set_Enum_Esize (T : Entity_Id);
+ -- This routine sets the Esize field for an enumeration type T, based
+ -- on the current representation information available for T. Note that
+ -- the setting of the RM_Size field is not affected. This routine also
+ -- initializes the alignment field to zero.
+
+ function Minimum_Size
+ (T : Entity_Id;
+ Biased : Boolean := False) return Nat;
+ -- Given an elementary type, determines the minimum number of bits required
+ -- to represent all values of the type. This function may not be called
+ -- with any other types. If the flag Biased is set True, then the minimum
+ -- size calculation that biased representation is used in the case of a
+ -- discrete type, e.g. the range 7..8 gives a minimum size of 4 with
+ -- Biased set to False, and 1 with Biased set to True. Note that the
+ -- biased parameter only has an effect if the type is not biased, it
+ -- causes Minimum_Size to indicate the minimum size of an object with
+ -- the given type, of the size the type would have if it were biased. If
+ -- the type is already biased, then Minimum_Size returns the biased size,
+ -- regardless of the setting of Biased. Also, fixed-point types are never
+ -- biased in the current implementation. If the size is not known at
+ -- compile time, this function returns 0.
+
+ procedure Check_Constant_Address_Clause (Expr : Node_Id; U_Ent : Entity_Id);
+ -- Expr is an expression for an address clause. This procedure checks
+ -- that the expression is constant, in the limited sense that it is safe
+ -- to evaluate it at the point the object U_Ent is declared, rather than
+ -- at the point of the address clause. The condition for this to be true
+ -- is that the expression has no variables, no constants declared after
+ -- U_Ent, and no calls to non-pure functions. If this condition is not
+ -- met, then an appropriate error message is posted. This check is applied
+ -- at the point an object with an address clause is frozen, as well as for
+ -- address clauses for tasks and entries.
+
+ procedure Check_Size
+ (N : Node_Id;
+ T : Entity_Id;
+ Siz : Uint;
+ Biased : out Boolean);
+ -- Called when size Siz is specified for subtype T. This subprogram checks
+ -- that the size is appropriate, posting errors on node N as required.
+ -- This check is effective for elementary types and bit-packed arrays.
+ -- For other non-elementary types, a check is only made if an explicit
+ -- size has been given for the type (and the specified size must match).
+ -- The parameter Biased is set False if the size specified did not require
+ -- the use of biased representation, and True if biased representation
+ -- was required to meet the size requirement. Note that Biased is only
+ -- set if the type is not currently biased, but biasing it is the only
+ -- way to meet the requirement. If the type is currently biased, then
+ -- this biased size is used in the initial check, and Biased is False.
+ -- If the size is too small, and an error message is given, then both
+ -- Esize and RM_Size are reset to the allowed minimum value in T.
+
+ function Rep_Item_Too_Early (T : Entity_Id; N : Node_Id) return Boolean;
+ -- Called at the start of processing a representation clause or a
+ -- representation pragma. Used to check that the representation item
+ -- is not being applied to an incomplete type or to a generic formal
+ -- type or a type derived from a generic formal type. Returns False if
+ -- no such error occurs. If this error does occur, appropriate error
+ -- messages are posted on node N, and True is returned.
+
+ function Rep_Item_Too_Late
+ (T : Entity_Id;
+ N : Node_Id;
+ FOnly : Boolean := False) return Boolean;
+ -- Called at the start of processing a representation clause or a
+ -- representation pragma. Used to check that a representation item
+ -- for entity T does not appear too late (according to the rules in
+ -- RM 13.1(9) and RM 13.1(10)). N is the associated node, which in
+ -- the pragma case is the pragma or representation clause itself, used
+ -- for placing error messages if the item is too late.
+ --
+ -- Fonly is a flag that causes only the freezing rule (para 9) to be
+ -- applied, and the tests of para 10 are skipped. This is appropriate
+ -- for both subtype related attributes (Alignment and Size) and for
+ -- stream attributes, which, although certainly not subtype related
+ -- attributes, clearly should not be subject to the para 10 restrictions
+ -- (see AI95-00137). Similarly, we also skip the para 10 restrictions for
+ -- the Storage_Size case where they also clearly do not apply, and for
+ -- Stream_Convert which is in the same category as the stream attributes.
+ --
+ -- If the rep item is too late, an appropriate message is output and
+ -- True is returned, which is a signal that the caller should abandon
+ -- processing for the item. If the item is not too late, then False
+ -- is returned, and the caller can continue processing the item.
+ --
+ -- If no error is detected, this call also as a side effect links the
+ -- representation item onto the head of the representation item chain
+ -- (referenced by the First_Rep_Item field of the entity).
+ --
+ -- Note: Rep_Item_Too_Late must be called with the underlying type in
+ -- the case of a private or incomplete type. The protocol is to first
+ -- check for Rep_Item_Too_Early using the initial entity, then take the
+ -- underlying type, then call Rep_Item_Too_Late on the result.
+ --
+ -- Note: Calls to Rep_Item_Too_Late are ignored for the case of attribute
+ -- definition clauses which have From_Aspect_Specification set. This is
+ -- because such clauses are linked on to the Rep_Item chain in procedure
+ -- Sem_Ch13.Analyze_Aspect_Specifications. See that procedure for details.
+
+ function Same_Representation (Typ1, Typ2 : Entity_Id) return Boolean;
+ -- Given two types, where the two types are related by possible derivation,
+ -- determines if the two types have the same representation, or different
+ -- representations, requiring the special processing for representation
+ -- change. A False result is possible only for array, enumeration or
+ -- record types.
+
+ procedure Validate_Unchecked_Conversion
+ (N : Node_Id;
+ Act_Unit : Entity_Id);
+ -- Validate a call to unchecked conversion. N is the node for the actual
+ -- instantiation, which is used only for error messages. Act_Unit is the
+ -- entity for the instantiation, from which the actual types etc. for this
+ -- instantiation can be determined. This procedure makes an entry in a
+ -- table and/or generates an N_Validate_Unchecked_Conversion node. The
+ -- actual checking is done in Validate_Unchecked_Conversions or in the
+ -- back end as required.
+
+ procedure Validate_Unchecked_Conversions;
+ -- This routine is called after calling the backend to validate unchecked
+ -- conversions for size and alignment appropriateness. The reason it is
+ -- called that late is to take advantage of any back-annotation of size
+ -- and alignment performed by the backend.
+
+ procedure Validate_Address_Clauses;
+ -- This is called after the back end has been called (and thus after the
+ -- alignments of objects have been back annotated). It goes through the
+ -- table of saved address clauses checking for suspicious alignments and
+ -- if necessary issuing warnings.
+
+ procedure Validate_Independence;
+ -- This is called after the back end has been called (and thus after the
+ -- layout of components has been back annotated). It goes through the
+ -- table of saved pragma Independent[_Component] entries, checking that
+ -- independence can be achieved, and if necessary issuing error messages.
+
+ -------------------------------------
+ -- Table for Validate_Independence --
+ -------------------------------------
+
+ -- If a legal pragma Independent or Independent_Components is given for
+ -- an entity, then an entry is made in this table, to be checked by a
+ -- call to Validate_Independence after back annotation of layout is done.
+
+ type Independence_Check_Record is record
+ N : Node_Id;
+ -- The pragma Independent or Independent_Components
+
+ E : Entity_Id;
+ -- The entity to which it applies
+ end record;
+
+ package Independence_Checks is new Table.Table (
+ Table_Component_Type => Independence_Check_Record,
+ Table_Index_Type => Int,
+ Table_Low_Bound => 1,
+ Table_Initial => 20,
+ Table_Increment => 200,
+ Table_Name => "Independence_Checks");
+
+ -----------------------------------
+ -- Handling of Aspect Visibility --
+ -----------------------------------
+
+ -- The visibility of aspects is tricky. First, the visibility is delayed
+ -- to the freeze point. This is not too complicated, what we do is simply
+ -- to leave the aspect "laying in wait" for the freeze point, and at that
+ -- point materialize and analyze the corresponding attribute definition
+ -- clause or pragma. There is some special processing for preconditions
+ -- and postonditions, where the pragmas themselves deal with the required
+ -- delay, but basically the approach is the same, delay analysis of the
+ -- expression to the freeze point.
+
+ -- Much harder is the requirement for diagnosing cases in which an early
+ -- freeze causes a change in visibility. Consider:
+
+ -- package AspectVis is
+ -- R_Size : constant Integer := 32;
+ --
+ -- package Inner is
+ -- type R is new Integer with
+ -- Size => R_Size;
+ -- F : R; -- freezes
+ -- R_Size : constant Integer := 64;
+ -- S : constant Integer := R'Size; -- 32 not 64
+ -- end Inner;
+ -- end AspectVis;
+
+ -- Here the 32 not 64 shows what would be expected if this program were
+ -- legal, since the evaluation of R_Size has to be done at the freeze
+ -- point and gets the outer definition not the inner one.
+
+ -- But the language rule requires this program to be diagnosed as illegal
+ -- because the visibility changes between the freeze point and the end of
+ -- the declarative region.
+
+ -- To meet this requirement, we first note that the Expression field of the
+ -- N_Aspect_Specification node holds the raw unanalyzed expression, which
+ -- will get used in processing the aspect. At the time of analyzing the
+ -- N_Aspect_Specification node, we create a complete copy of the expression
+ -- and store it in the entity field of the Identifier (an odd usage, but
+ -- the identifier is not used except to identify the aspect, so its Entity
+ -- field is otherwise unused, and we are short of room in the node).
+
+ -- This copy stays unanalyzed up to the freeze point, where we analyze the
+ -- resulting pragma or attribute definition clause, except that in the
+ -- case of invariants and predicates, we mark occurrences of the subtype
+ -- name as having the entity of the subprogram parameter, so that they
+ -- will not cause trouble in the following steps.
+
+ -- Then at the freeze point, we create another copy of this unanalyzed
+ -- expression. By this time we no longer need the Expression field for
+ -- other purposes, so we can store it there. Now we have two copies of
+ -- the original unanalyzed expression. One of them gets preanalyzed at
+ -- the freeze point to capture the visibility at the freeze point.
+
+ -- Now when we hit the freeze all at the end of the declarative part, if
+ -- we come across a frozen entity with delayed aspects, we still have one
+ -- copy of the unanalyzed expression available in the node, and we again
+ -- do a preanalysis using that copy and the visibility at the end of the
+ -- declarative part. Now we have two preanalyzed expression (preanalysis
+ -- is good enough, since we are only interested in referenced entities).
+ -- One captures the visibility at the freeze point, the other captures the
+ -- visibility at the end of the declarative part. We see if the entities
+ -- in these two expressions are the same, by seeing if the two expressions
+ -- are fully conformant, and if not, issue appropriate error messages.
+
+ -- Quite an awkward procedure, but this is an awkard requirement!
+
+ procedure Analyze_Aspects_At_Freeze_Point (E : Entity_Id);
+ -- Analyze all the delayed aspects for entity E at freezing point
+
+ procedure Check_Aspect_At_Freeze_Point (ASN : Node_Id);
+ -- Performs the processing described above at the freeze point, ASN is the
+ -- N_Aspect_Specification node for the aspect.
+
+ procedure Check_Aspect_At_End_Of_Declarations (ASN : Node_Id);
+ -- Performs the processing described above at the freeze all point, and
+ -- issues appropriate error messages if the visibility has indeed changed.
+ -- Again, ASN is the N_Aspect_Specification node for the aspect.
+
+ procedure Inherit_Aspects_At_Freeze_Point (Typ : Entity_Id);
+ -- Given an entity Typ that denotes a derived type or a subtype, this
+ -- routine performs the inheritance of aspects at the freeze point.
+end Sem_Ch13;