aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/gcc-4.4.0/gcc/ada/par-ch5.adb
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc-4.4.0/gcc/ada/par-ch5.adb')
-rw-r--r--gcc-4.4.0/gcc/ada/par-ch5.adb2249
1 files changed, 2249 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gcc-4.4.0/gcc/ada/par-ch5.adb b/gcc-4.4.0/gcc/ada/par-ch5.adb
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..57c54449a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc-4.4.0/gcc/ada/par-ch5.adb
@@ -0,0 +1,2249 @@
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+-- --
+-- GNAT COMPILER COMPONENTS --
+-- --
+-- P A R . C H 5 --
+-- --
+-- B o d y --
+-- --
+-- Copyright (C) 1992-2008, Free Software Foundation, Inc. --
+-- --
+-- GNAT is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under --
+-- terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Soft- --
+-- ware Foundation; either version 3, or (at your option) any later ver- --
+-- sion. GNAT is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITH- --
+-- OUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY --
+-- or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License --
+-- for more details. You should have received a copy of the GNU General --
+-- Public License distributed with GNAT; see file COPYING3. If not, go to --
+-- http://www.gnu.org/licenses for a complete copy of the license. --
+-- --
+-- GNAT was originally developed by the GNAT team at New York University. --
+-- Extensive contributions were provided by Ada Core Technologies Inc. --
+-- --
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+pragma Style_Checks (All_Checks);
+-- Turn off subprogram body ordering check. Subprograms are in order
+-- by RM section rather than alphabetical
+
+separate (Par)
+package body Ch5 is
+
+ -- Local functions, used only in this chapter
+
+ function P_Case_Statement return Node_Id;
+ function P_Case_Statement_Alternative return Node_Id;
+ function P_Condition return Node_Id;
+ function P_Exit_Statement return Node_Id;
+ function P_Goto_Statement return Node_Id;
+ function P_If_Statement return Node_Id;
+ function P_Label return Node_Id;
+ function P_Loop_Parameter_Specification return Node_Id;
+ function P_Null_Statement return Node_Id;
+
+ function P_Assignment_Statement (LHS : Node_Id) return Node_Id;
+ -- Parse assignment statement. On entry, the caller has scanned the left
+ -- hand side (passed in as Lhs), and the colon-equal (or some symbol
+ -- taken to be an error equivalent such as equal).
+
+ function P_Begin_Statement (Block_Name : Node_Id := Empty) return Node_Id;
+ -- Parse begin-end statement. If Block_Name is non-Empty on entry, it is
+ -- the N_Identifier node for the label on the block. If Block_Name is
+ -- Empty on entry (the default), then the block statement is unlabeled.
+
+ function P_Declare_Statement (Block_Name : Node_Id := Empty) return Node_Id;
+ -- Parse declare block. If Block_Name is non-Empty on entry, it is
+ -- the N_Identifier node for the label on the block. If Block_Name is
+ -- Empty on entry (the default), then the block statement is unlabeled.
+
+ function P_For_Statement (Loop_Name : Node_Id := Empty) return Node_Id;
+ -- Parse for statement. If Loop_Name is non-Empty on entry, it is
+ -- the N_Identifier node for the label on the loop. If Loop_Name is
+ -- Empty on entry (the default), then the for statement is unlabeled.
+
+ function P_Loop_Statement (Loop_Name : Node_Id := Empty) return Node_Id;
+ -- Parse loop statement. If Loop_Name is non-Empty on entry, it is
+ -- the N_Identifier node for the label on the loop. If Loop_Name is
+ -- Empty on entry (the default), then the loop statement is unlabeled.
+
+ function P_While_Statement (Loop_Name : Node_Id := Empty) return Node_Id;
+ -- Parse while statement. If Loop_Name is non-Empty on entry, it is
+ -- the N_Identifier node for the label on the loop. If Loop_Name is
+ -- Empty on entry (the default), then the while statement is unlabeled.
+
+ function Set_Loop_Block_Name (L : Character) return Name_Id;
+ -- Given a letter 'L' for a loop or 'B' for a block, returns a name
+ -- of the form L_nn or B_nn where nn is a serial number obtained by
+ -- incrementing the variable Loop_Block_Count.
+
+ procedure Then_Scan;
+ -- Scan past THEN token, testing for illegal junk after it
+
+ ---------------------------------
+ -- 5.1 Sequence of Statements --
+ ---------------------------------
+
+ -- SEQUENCE_OF_STATEMENTS ::= STATEMENT {STATEMENT}
+
+ -- STATEMENT ::=
+ -- {LABEL} SIMPLE_STATEMENT | {LABEL} COMPOUND_STATEMENT
+
+ -- SIMPLE_STATEMENT ::= NULL_STATEMENT
+ -- | ASSIGNMENT_STATEMENT | EXIT_STATEMENT
+ -- | GOTO_STATEMENT | PROCEDURE_CALL_STATEMENT
+ -- | RETURN_STATEMENT | ENTRY_CALL_STATEMENT
+ -- | REQUEUE_STATEMENT | DELAY_STATEMENT
+ -- | ABORT_STATEMENT | RAISE_STATEMENT
+ -- | CODE_STATEMENT
+
+ -- COMPOUND_STATEMENT ::=
+ -- IF_STATEMENT | CASE_STATEMENT
+ -- | LOOP_STATEMENT | BLOCK_STATEMENT
+ -- | ACCEPT_STATEMENT | SELECT_STATEMENT
+
+ -- This procedure scans a sequence of statements. The caller sets SS_Flags
+ -- to indicate acceptable termination conditions for the sequence:
+
+ -- SS_Flags.Eftm Terminate on ELSIF
+ -- SS_Flags.Eltm Terminate on ELSE
+ -- SS_Flags.Extm Terminate on EXCEPTION
+ -- SS_Flags.Ortm Terminate on OR
+ -- SS_Flags.Tatm Terminate on THEN ABORT (Token = ABORT on return)
+ -- SS_Flags.Whtm Terminate on WHEN
+ -- SS_Flags.Unco Unconditional terminate after scanning one statement
+
+ -- In addition, the scan is always terminated by encountering END or the
+ -- end of file (EOF) condition. If one of the six above terminators is
+ -- encountered with the corresponding SS_Flags flag not set, then the
+ -- action taken is as follows:
+
+ -- If the keyword occurs to the left of the expected column of the end
+ -- for the current sequence (as recorded in the current end context),
+ -- then it is assumed to belong to an outer context, and is considered
+ -- to terminate the sequence of statements.
+
+ -- If the keyword occurs to the right of, or in the expected column of
+ -- the end for the current sequence, then an error message is output,
+ -- the keyword together with its associated context is skipped, and
+ -- the statement scan continues until another terminator is found.
+
+ -- Note that the first action means that control can return to the caller
+ -- with Token set to a terminator other than one of those specified by the
+ -- SS parameter. The caller should treat such a case as equivalent to END.
+
+ -- In addition, the flag SS_Flags.Sreq is set to True to indicate that at
+ -- least one real statement (other than a pragma) is required in the
+ -- statement sequence. During the processing of the sequence, this
+ -- flag is manipulated to indicate the current status of the requirement
+ -- for a statement. For example, it is turned off by the occurrence of a
+ -- statement, and back on by a label (which requires a following statement)
+
+ -- Error recovery: cannot raise Error_Resync. If an error occurs during
+ -- parsing a statement, then the scan pointer is advanced past the next
+ -- semicolon and the parse continues.
+
+ function P_Sequence_Of_Statements (SS_Flags : SS_Rec) return List_Id is
+
+ Statement_Required : Boolean;
+ -- This flag indicates if a subsequent statement (other than a pragma)
+ -- is required. It is initialized from the Sreq flag, and modified as
+ -- statements are scanned (a statement turns it off, and a label turns
+ -- it back on again since a statement must follow a label).
+
+ Declaration_Found : Boolean := False;
+ -- This flag is set True if a declaration is encountered, so that the
+ -- error message about declarations in the statement part is only
+ -- given once for a given sequence of statements.
+
+ Scan_State_Label : Saved_Scan_State;
+ Scan_State : Saved_Scan_State;
+
+ Statement_List : List_Id;
+ Block_Label : Name_Id;
+ Id_Node : Node_Id;
+ Name_Node : Node_Id;
+
+ procedure Junk_Declaration;
+ -- Procedure called to handle error of declaration encountered in
+ -- statement sequence.
+
+ procedure Test_Statement_Required;
+ -- Flag error if Statement_Required flag set
+
+ ----------------------
+ -- Junk_Declaration --
+ ----------------------
+
+ procedure Junk_Declaration is
+ begin
+ if (not Declaration_Found) or All_Errors_Mode then
+ Error_Msg_SC ("declarations must come before BEGIN");
+ Declaration_Found := True;
+ end if;
+
+ Skip_Declaration (Statement_List);
+ end Junk_Declaration;
+
+ -----------------------------
+ -- Test_Statement_Required --
+ -----------------------------
+
+ procedure Test_Statement_Required is
+ begin
+ if Statement_Required then
+ Error_Msg_BC ("statement expected");
+ end if;
+ end Test_Statement_Required;
+
+ -- Start of processing for P_Sequence_Of_Statements
+
+ begin
+ Statement_List := New_List;
+ Statement_Required := SS_Flags.Sreq;
+
+ loop
+ Ignore (Tok_Semicolon);
+
+ begin
+ if Style_Check then
+ Style.Check_Indentation;
+ end if;
+
+ -- Deal with reserved identifier (in assignment or call)
+
+ if Is_Reserved_Identifier then
+ Save_Scan_State (Scan_State); -- at possible bad identifier
+ Scan; -- and scan past it
+
+ -- We have an reserved word which is spelled in identifier
+ -- style, so the question is whether it really is intended
+ -- to be an identifier.
+
+ if
+ -- If followed by a semicolon, then it is an identifier,
+ -- with the exception of the cases tested for below.
+
+ (Token = Tok_Semicolon
+ and then Prev_Token /= Tok_Return
+ and then Prev_Token /= Tok_Null
+ and then Prev_Token /= Tok_Raise
+ and then Prev_Token /= Tok_End
+ and then Prev_Token /= Tok_Exit)
+
+ -- If followed by colon, colon-equal, or dot, then we
+ -- definitely have an identifier (could not be reserved)
+
+ or else Token = Tok_Colon
+ or else Token = Tok_Colon_Equal
+ or else Token = Tok_Dot
+
+ -- Left paren means we have an identifier except for those
+ -- reserved words that can legitimately be followed by a
+ -- left paren.
+
+ or else
+ (Token = Tok_Left_Paren
+ and then Prev_Token /= Tok_Case
+ and then Prev_Token /= Tok_Delay
+ and then Prev_Token /= Tok_If
+ and then Prev_Token /= Tok_Elsif
+ and then Prev_Token /= Tok_Return
+ and then Prev_Token /= Tok_When
+ and then Prev_Token /= Tok_While
+ and then Prev_Token /= Tok_Separate)
+ then
+ -- Here we have an apparent reserved identifier and the
+ -- token past it is appropriate to this usage (and would
+ -- be a definite error if this is not an identifier). What
+ -- we do is to use P_Identifier to fix up the identifier,
+ -- and then fall into the normal processing.
+
+ Restore_Scan_State (Scan_State); -- back to the ID
+ Scan_Reserved_Identifier (Force_Msg => False);
+
+ -- Not a reserved identifier after all (or at least we can't
+ -- be sure that it is), so reset the scan and continue.
+
+ else
+ Restore_Scan_State (Scan_State); -- back to the reserved word
+ end if;
+ end if;
+
+ -- Now look to see what kind of statement we have
+
+ case Token is
+
+ -- Case of end or EOF
+
+ when Tok_End | Tok_EOF =>
+
+ -- These tokens always terminate the statement sequence
+
+ Test_Statement_Required;
+ exit;
+
+ -- Case of ELSIF
+
+ when Tok_Elsif =>
+
+ -- Terminate if Eftm set or if the ELSIF is to the left
+ -- of the expected column of the end for this sequence
+
+ if SS_Flags.Eftm
+ or else Start_Column < Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Ecol
+ then
+ Test_Statement_Required;
+ exit;
+
+ -- Otherwise complain and skip past ELSIF Condition then
+
+ else
+ Error_Msg_SC ("ELSIF not allowed here");
+ Scan; -- past ELSIF
+ Discard_Junk_Node (P_Expression_No_Right_Paren);
+ Then_Scan;
+ Statement_Required := False;
+ end if;
+
+ -- Case of ELSE
+
+ when Tok_Else =>
+
+ -- Terminate if Eltm set or if the else is to the left
+ -- of the expected column of the end for this sequence
+
+ if SS_Flags.Eltm
+ or else Start_Column < Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Ecol
+ then
+ Test_Statement_Required;
+ exit;
+
+ -- Otherwise complain and skip past else
+
+ else
+ Error_Msg_SC ("ELSE not allowed here");
+ Scan; -- past ELSE
+ Statement_Required := False;
+ end if;
+
+ -- Case of exception
+
+ when Tok_Exception =>
+ Test_Statement_Required;
+
+ -- If Extm not set and the exception is not to the left
+ -- of the expected column of the end for this sequence, then
+ -- we assume it belongs to the current sequence, even though
+ -- it is not permitted.
+
+ if not SS_Flags.Extm and then
+ Start_Column >= Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Ecol
+
+ then
+ Error_Msg_SC ("exception handler not permitted here");
+ Scan; -- past EXCEPTION
+ Discard_Junk_List (Parse_Exception_Handlers);
+ end if;
+
+ -- Always return, in the case where we scanned out handlers
+ -- that we did not expect, Parse_Exception_Handlers returned
+ -- with Token being either end or EOF, so we are OK
+
+ exit;
+
+ -- Case of OR
+
+ when Tok_Or =>
+
+ -- Terminate if Ortm set or if the or is to the left
+ -- of the expected column of the end for this sequence
+
+ if SS_Flags.Ortm
+ or else Start_Column < Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Ecol
+ then
+ Test_Statement_Required;
+ exit;
+
+ -- Otherwise complain and skip past or
+
+ else
+ Error_Msg_SC ("OR not allowed here");
+ Scan; -- past or
+ Statement_Required := False;
+ end if;
+
+ -- Case of THEN (deal also with THEN ABORT)
+
+ when Tok_Then =>
+ Save_Scan_State (Scan_State); -- at THEN
+ Scan; -- past THEN
+
+ -- Terminate if THEN ABORT allowed (ATC case)
+
+ exit when SS_Flags.Tatm and then Token = Tok_Abort;
+
+ -- Otherwise we treat THEN as some kind of mess where we
+ -- did not see the associated IF, but we pick up assuming
+ -- it had been there!
+
+ Restore_Scan_State (Scan_State); -- to THEN
+ Append_To (Statement_List, P_If_Statement);
+ Statement_Required := False;
+
+ -- Case of WHEN (error because we are not in a case)
+
+ when Tok_When | Tok_Others =>
+
+ -- Terminate if Whtm set or if the WHEN is to the left
+ -- of the expected column of the end for this sequence
+
+ if SS_Flags.Whtm
+ or else Start_Column < Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Ecol
+ then
+ Test_Statement_Required;
+ exit;
+
+ -- Otherwise complain and skip when Choice {| Choice} =>
+
+ else
+ Error_Msg_SC ("WHEN not allowed here");
+ Scan; -- past when
+ Discard_Junk_List (P_Discrete_Choice_List);
+ TF_Arrow;
+ Statement_Required := False;
+ end if;
+
+ -- Cases of statements starting with an identifier
+
+ when Tok_Identifier =>
+ Check_Bad_Layout;
+
+ -- Save scan pointers and line number in case block label
+
+ Id_Node := Token_Node;
+ Block_Label := Token_Name;
+ Save_Scan_State (Scan_State_Label); -- at possible label
+ Scan; -- past Id
+
+ -- Check for common case of assignment, since it occurs
+ -- frequently, and we want to process it efficiently.
+
+ if Token = Tok_Colon_Equal then
+ Scan; -- past the colon-equal
+ Append_To (Statement_List,
+ P_Assignment_Statement (Id_Node));
+ Statement_Required := False;
+
+ -- Check common case of procedure call, another case that
+ -- we want to speed up as much as possible.
+
+ elsif Token = Tok_Semicolon then
+ Append_To (Statement_List,
+ P_Statement_Name (Id_Node));
+ Scan; -- past semicolon
+ Statement_Required := False;
+
+ -- Check for case of "go to" in place of "goto"
+
+ elsif Token = Tok_Identifier
+ and then Block_Label = Name_Go
+ and then Token_Name = Name_To
+ then
+ Error_Msg_SP ("goto is one word");
+ Append_To (Statement_List, P_Goto_Statement);
+ Statement_Required := False;
+
+ -- Check common case of = used instead of :=, just so we
+ -- give a better error message for this special misuse.
+
+ elsif Token = Tok_Equal then
+ T_Colon_Equal; -- give := expected message
+ Append_To (Statement_List,
+ P_Assignment_Statement (Id_Node));
+ Statement_Required := False;
+
+ -- Check case of loop label or block label
+
+ elsif Token = Tok_Colon
+ or else (Token in Token_Class_Labeled_Stmt
+ and then not Token_Is_At_Start_Of_Line)
+ then
+ T_Colon; -- past colon (if there, or msg for missing one)
+
+ -- Test for more than one label
+
+ loop
+ exit when Token /= Tok_Identifier;
+ Save_Scan_State (Scan_State); -- at second Id
+ Scan; -- past Id
+
+ if Token = Tok_Colon then
+ Error_Msg_SP
+ ("only one label allowed on block or loop");
+ Scan; -- past colon on extra label
+
+ -- Use the second label as the "real" label
+
+ Scan_State_Label := Scan_State;
+
+ -- We will set Error_name as the Block_Label since
+ -- we really don't know which of the labels might
+ -- be used at the end of the loop or block!
+
+ Block_Label := Error_Name;
+
+ -- If Id with no colon, then backup to point to the
+ -- Id and we will issue the message below when we try
+ -- to scan out the statement as some other form.
+
+ else
+ Restore_Scan_State (Scan_State); -- to second Id
+ exit;
+ end if;
+ end loop;
+
+ -- Loop_Statement (labeled Loop_Statement)
+
+ if Token = Tok_Loop then
+ Append_To (Statement_List,
+ P_Loop_Statement (Id_Node));
+
+ -- While statement (labeled loop statement with WHILE)
+
+ elsif Token = Tok_While then
+ Append_To (Statement_List,
+ P_While_Statement (Id_Node));
+
+ -- Declare statement (labeled block statement with
+ -- DECLARE part)
+
+ elsif Token = Tok_Declare then
+ Append_To (Statement_List,
+ P_Declare_Statement (Id_Node));
+
+ -- Begin statement (labeled block statement with no
+ -- DECLARE part)
+
+ elsif Token = Tok_Begin then
+ Append_To (Statement_List,
+ P_Begin_Statement (Id_Node));
+
+ -- For statement (labeled loop statement with FOR)
+
+ elsif Token = Tok_For then
+ Append_To (Statement_List,
+ P_For_Statement (Id_Node));
+
+ -- Improper statement follows label. If we have an
+ -- expression token, then assume the colon was part
+ -- of a misplaced declaration.
+
+ elsif Token not in Token_Class_Eterm then
+ Restore_Scan_State (Scan_State_Label);
+ Junk_Declaration;
+
+ -- Otherwise complain we have inappropriate statement
+
+ else
+ Error_Msg_AP
+ ("loop or block statement must follow label");
+ end if;
+
+ Statement_Required := False;
+
+ -- Here we have an identifier followed by something
+ -- other than a colon, semicolon or assignment symbol.
+ -- The only valid possibility is a name extension symbol
+
+ elsif Token in Token_Class_Namext then
+ Restore_Scan_State (Scan_State_Label); -- to Id
+ Name_Node := P_Name;
+
+ -- Skip junk right parens in this context
+
+ Ignore (Tok_Right_Paren);
+
+ -- Check context following call
+
+ if Token = Tok_Colon_Equal then
+ Scan; -- past colon equal
+ Append_To (Statement_List,
+ P_Assignment_Statement (Name_Node));
+ Statement_Required := False;
+
+ -- Check common case of = used instead of :=
+
+ elsif Token = Tok_Equal then
+ T_Colon_Equal; -- give := expected message
+ Append_To (Statement_List,
+ P_Assignment_Statement (Name_Node));
+ Statement_Required := False;
+
+ -- Check apostrophe cases
+
+ elsif Token = Tok_Apostrophe then
+ Append_To (Statement_List,
+ P_Code_Statement (Name_Node));
+ Statement_Required := False;
+
+ -- The only other valid item after a name is ; which
+ -- means that the item we just scanned was a call.
+
+ elsif Token = Tok_Semicolon then
+ Append_To (Statement_List,
+ P_Statement_Name (Name_Node));
+ Scan; -- past semicolon
+ Statement_Required := False;
+
+ -- A slash following an identifier or a selected
+ -- component in this situation is most likely a period
+ -- (see location of keys on keyboard).
+
+ elsif Token = Tok_Slash
+ and then (Nkind (Name_Node) = N_Identifier
+ or else
+ Nkind (Name_Node) = N_Selected_Component)
+ then
+ Error_Msg_SC ("""/"" should be "".""");
+ Statement_Required := False;
+ raise Error_Resync;
+
+ -- Else we have a missing semicolon
+
+ else
+ TF_Semicolon;
+ Statement_Required := False;
+ end if;
+
+ -- If junk after identifier, check if identifier is an
+ -- instance of an incorrectly spelled keyword. If so, we
+ -- do nothing. The Bad_Spelling_Of will have reset Token
+ -- to the appropriate keyword, so the next time round the
+ -- loop we will process the modified token. Note that we
+ -- check for ELSIF before ELSE here. That's not accidental.
+ -- We don't want to identify a misspelling of ELSE as
+ -- ELSIF, and in particular we do not want to treat ELSEIF
+ -- as ELSE IF.
+
+ else
+ Restore_Scan_State (Scan_State_Label); -- to identifier
+
+ if Bad_Spelling_Of (Tok_Abort)
+ or else Bad_Spelling_Of (Tok_Accept)
+ or else Bad_Spelling_Of (Tok_Case)
+ or else Bad_Spelling_Of (Tok_Declare)
+ or else Bad_Spelling_Of (Tok_Delay)
+ or else Bad_Spelling_Of (Tok_Elsif)
+ or else Bad_Spelling_Of (Tok_Else)
+ or else Bad_Spelling_Of (Tok_End)
+ or else Bad_Spelling_Of (Tok_Exception)
+ or else Bad_Spelling_Of (Tok_Exit)
+ or else Bad_Spelling_Of (Tok_For)
+ or else Bad_Spelling_Of (Tok_Goto)
+ or else Bad_Spelling_Of (Tok_If)
+ or else Bad_Spelling_Of (Tok_Loop)
+ or else Bad_Spelling_Of (Tok_Or)
+ or else Bad_Spelling_Of (Tok_Pragma)
+ or else Bad_Spelling_Of (Tok_Raise)
+ or else Bad_Spelling_Of (Tok_Requeue)
+ or else Bad_Spelling_Of (Tok_Return)
+ or else Bad_Spelling_Of (Tok_Select)
+ or else Bad_Spelling_Of (Tok_When)
+ or else Bad_Spelling_Of (Tok_While)
+ then
+ null;
+
+ -- If not a bad spelling, then we really have junk
+
+ else
+ Scan; -- past identifier again
+
+ -- If next token is first token on line, then we
+ -- consider that we were missing a semicolon after
+ -- the identifier, and process it as a procedure
+ -- call with no parameters.
+
+ if Token_Is_At_Start_Of_Line then
+ Append_To (Statement_List,
+ P_Statement_Name (Id_Node));
+ T_Semicolon; -- to give error message
+ Statement_Required := False;
+
+ -- Otherwise we give a missing := message and
+ -- simply abandon the junk that is there now.
+
+ else
+ T_Colon_Equal; -- give := expected message
+ raise Error_Resync;
+ end if;
+
+ end if;
+ end if;
+
+ -- Statement starting with operator symbol. This could be
+ -- a call, a name starting an assignment, or a qualified
+ -- expression.
+
+ when Tok_Operator_Symbol =>
+ Check_Bad_Layout;
+ Name_Node := P_Name;
+
+ -- An attempt at a range attribute or a qualified expression
+ -- must be illegal here (a code statement cannot possibly
+ -- allow qualification by a function name).
+
+ if Token = Tok_Apostrophe then
+ Error_Msg_SC ("apostrophe illegal here");
+ raise Error_Resync;
+ end if;
+
+ -- Scan possible assignment if we have a name
+
+ if Expr_Form = EF_Name
+ and then Token = Tok_Colon_Equal
+ then
+ Scan; -- past colon equal
+ Append_To (Statement_List,
+ P_Assignment_Statement (Name_Node));
+ else
+ Append_To (Statement_List,
+ P_Statement_Name (Name_Node));
+ end if;
+
+ TF_Semicolon;
+ Statement_Required := False;
+
+ -- Label starting with << which must precede real statement
+
+ when Tok_Less_Less =>
+ Append_To (Statement_List, P_Label);
+ Statement_Required := True;
+
+ -- Pragma appearing as a statement in a statement sequence
+
+ when Tok_Pragma =>
+ Check_Bad_Layout;
+ Append_To (Statement_List, P_Pragma);
+
+ -- Abort_Statement
+
+ when Tok_Abort =>
+ Check_Bad_Layout;
+ Append_To (Statement_List, P_Abort_Statement);
+ Statement_Required := False;
+
+ -- Accept_Statement
+
+ when Tok_Accept =>
+ Check_Bad_Layout;
+ Append_To (Statement_List, P_Accept_Statement);
+ Statement_Required := False;
+
+ -- Begin_Statement (Block_Statement with no declare, no label)
+
+ when Tok_Begin =>
+ Check_Bad_Layout;
+ Append_To (Statement_List, P_Begin_Statement);
+ Statement_Required := False;
+
+ -- Case_Statement
+
+ when Tok_Case =>
+ Check_Bad_Layout;
+ Append_To (Statement_List, P_Case_Statement);
+ Statement_Required := False;
+
+ -- Block_Statement with DECLARE and no label
+
+ when Tok_Declare =>
+ Check_Bad_Layout;
+ Append_To (Statement_List, P_Declare_Statement);
+ Statement_Required := False;
+
+ -- Delay_Statement
+
+ when Tok_Delay =>
+ Check_Bad_Layout;
+ Append_To (Statement_List, P_Delay_Statement);
+ Statement_Required := False;
+
+ -- Exit_Statement
+
+ when Tok_Exit =>
+ Check_Bad_Layout;
+ Append_To (Statement_List, P_Exit_Statement);
+ Statement_Required := False;
+
+ -- Loop_Statement with FOR and no label
+
+ when Tok_For =>
+ Check_Bad_Layout;
+ Append_To (Statement_List, P_For_Statement);
+ Statement_Required := False;
+
+ -- Goto_Statement
+
+ when Tok_Goto =>
+ Check_Bad_Layout;
+ Append_To (Statement_List, P_Goto_Statement);
+ Statement_Required := False;
+
+ -- If_Statement
+
+ when Tok_If =>
+ Check_Bad_Layout;
+ Append_To (Statement_List, P_If_Statement);
+ Statement_Required := False;
+
+ -- Loop_Statement
+
+ when Tok_Loop =>
+ Check_Bad_Layout;
+ Append_To (Statement_List, P_Loop_Statement);
+ Statement_Required := False;
+
+ -- Null_Statement
+
+ when Tok_Null =>
+ Check_Bad_Layout;
+ Append_To (Statement_List, P_Null_Statement);
+ Statement_Required := False;
+
+ -- Raise_Statement
+
+ when Tok_Raise =>
+ Check_Bad_Layout;
+ Append_To (Statement_List, P_Raise_Statement);
+ Statement_Required := False;
+
+ -- Requeue_Statement
+
+ when Tok_Requeue =>
+ Check_Bad_Layout;
+ Append_To (Statement_List, P_Requeue_Statement);
+ Statement_Required := False;
+
+ -- Return_Statement
+
+ when Tok_Return =>
+ Check_Bad_Layout;
+ Append_To (Statement_List, P_Return_Statement);
+ Statement_Required := False;
+
+ -- Select_Statement
+
+ when Tok_Select =>
+ Check_Bad_Layout;
+ Append_To (Statement_List, P_Select_Statement);
+ Statement_Required := False;
+
+ -- While_Statement (Block_Statement with while and no loop)
+
+ when Tok_While =>
+ Check_Bad_Layout;
+ Append_To (Statement_List, P_While_Statement);
+ Statement_Required := False;
+
+ -- Anything else is some kind of junk, signal an error message
+ -- and then raise Error_Resync, to merge with the normal
+ -- handling of a bad statement.
+
+ when others =>
+
+ if Token in Token_Class_Declk then
+ Junk_Declaration;
+
+ else
+ Error_Msg_BC ("statement expected");
+ raise Error_Resync;
+ end if;
+ end case;
+
+ -- On error resynchronization, skip past next semicolon, and, since
+ -- we are still in the statement loop, look for next statement. We
+ -- set Statement_Required False to avoid an unnecessary error message
+ -- complaining that no statement was found (i.e. we consider the
+ -- junk to satisfy the requirement for a statement being present).
+
+ exception
+ when Error_Resync =>
+ Resync_Past_Semicolon_Or_To_Loop_Or_Then;
+ Statement_Required := False;
+ end;
+
+ exit when SS_Flags.Unco;
+
+ end loop;
+
+ return Statement_List;
+
+ end P_Sequence_Of_Statements;
+
+ --------------------
+ -- 5.1 Statement --
+ --------------------
+
+ -- Parsed by P_Sequence_Of_Statements (5.1), except for the case
+ -- of a statement of the form of a name, which is handled here. The
+ -- argument passed in is the tree for the name which has been scanned
+ -- The returned value is the corresponding statement form.
+
+ -- This routine is also used by Par.Prag for processing the procedure
+ -- call that appears as the second argument of a pragma Assert.
+
+ -- Error recovery: cannot raise Error_Resync
+
+ function P_Statement_Name (Name_Node : Node_Id) return Node_Id is
+ Stmt_Node : Node_Id;
+
+ begin
+ -- Case of Indexed component, which is a procedure call with arguments
+
+ if Nkind (Name_Node) = N_Indexed_Component then
+ declare
+ Prefix_Node : constant Node_Id := Prefix (Name_Node);
+ Exprs_Node : constant List_Id := Expressions (Name_Node);
+
+ begin
+ Change_Node (Name_Node, N_Procedure_Call_Statement);
+ Set_Name (Name_Node, Prefix_Node);
+ Set_Parameter_Associations (Name_Node, Exprs_Node);
+ return Name_Node;
+ end;
+
+ -- Case of function call node, which is a really a procedure call
+
+ elsif Nkind (Name_Node) = N_Function_Call then
+ declare
+ Fname_Node : constant Node_Id := Name (Name_Node);
+ Params_List : constant List_Id :=
+ Parameter_Associations (Name_Node);
+
+ begin
+ Change_Node (Name_Node, N_Procedure_Call_Statement);
+ Set_Name (Name_Node, Fname_Node);
+ Set_Parameter_Associations (Name_Node, Params_List);
+ return Name_Node;
+ end;
+
+ -- Case of call to attribute that denotes a procedure. Here we
+ -- just leave the attribute reference unchanged.
+
+ elsif Nkind (Name_Node) = N_Attribute_Reference
+ and then Is_Procedure_Attribute_Name (Attribute_Name (Name_Node))
+ then
+ return Name_Node;
+
+ -- All other cases of names are parameterless procedure calls
+
+ else
+ Stmt_Node :=
+ New_Node (N_Procedure_Call_Statement, Sloc (Name_Node));
+ Set_Name (Stmt_Node, Name_Node);
+ return Stmt_Node;
+ end if;
+
+ end P_Statement_Name;
+
+ ---------------------------
+ -- 5.1 Simple Statement --
+ ---------------------------
+
+ -- Parsed by P_Sequence_Of_Statements (5.1)
+
+ -----------------------------
+ -- 5.1 Compound Statement --
+ -----------------------------
+
+ -- Parsed by P_Sequence_Of_Statements (5.1)
+
+ -------------------------
+ -- 5.1 Null Statement --
+ -------------------------
+
+ -- NULL_STATEMENT ::= null;
+
+ -- The caller has already checked that the current token is null
+
+ -- Error recovery: cannot raise Error_Resync
+
+ function P_Null_Statement return Node_Id is
+ Null_Stmt_Node : Node_Id;
+
+ begin
+ Null_Stmt_Node := New_Node (N_Null_Statement, Token_Ptr);
+ Scan; -- past NULL
+ TF_Semicolon;
+ return Null_Stmt_Node;
+ end P_Null_Statement;
+
+ ----------------
+ -- 5.1 Label --
+ ----------------
+
+ -- LABEL ::= <<label_STATEMENT_IDENTIFIER>>
+
+ -- STATEMENT_IDENTIFIER ::= DIRECT_NAME
+
+ -- The IDENTIFIER of a STATEMENT_IDENTIFIER shall be an identifier
+ -- (not an OPERATOR_SYMBOL)
+
+ -- The caller has already checked that the current token is <<
+
+ -- Error recovery: can raise Error_Resync
+
+ function P_Label return Node_Id is
+ Label_Node : Node_Id;
+
+ begin
+ Label_Node := New_Node (N_Label, Token_Ptr);
+ Scan; -- past <<
+ Set_Identifier (Label_Node, P_Identifier (C_Greater_Greater));
+ T_Greater_Greater;
+ Append_Elmt (Label_Node, Label_List);
+ return Label_Node;
+ end P_Label;
+
+ -------------------------------
+ -- 5.1 Statement Identifier --
+ -------------------------------
+
+ -- Statement label is parsed by P_Label (5.1)
+
+ -- Loop label is parsed by P_Loop_Statement (5.5), P_For_Statement (5.5)
+ -- or P_While_Statement (5.5)
+
+ -- Block label is parsed by P_Begin_Statement (5.6) or
+ -- P_Declare_Statement (5.6)
+
+ -------------------------------
+ -- 5.2 Assignment Statement --
+ -------------------------------
+
+ -- ASSIGNMENT_STATEMENT ::=
+ -- variable_NAME := EXPRESSION;
+
+ -- Error recovery: can raise Error_Resync
+
+ function P_Assignment_Statement (LHS : Node_Id) return Node_Id is
+ Assign_Node : Node_Id;
+
+ begin
+ Assign_Node := New_Node (N_Assignment_Statement, Prev_Token_Ptr);
+ Set_Name (Assign_Node, LHS);
+ Set_Expression (Assign_Node, P_Expression_No_Right_Paren);
+ TF_Semicolon;
+ return Assign_Node;
+ end P_Assignment_Statement;
+
+ -----------------------
+ -- 5.3 If Statement --
+ -----------------------
+
+ -- IF_STATEMENT ::=
+ -- if CONDITION then
+ -- SEQUENCE_OF_STATEMENTS
+ -- {elsif CONDITION then
+ -- SEQUENCE_OF_STATEMENTS}
+ -- [else
+ -- SEQUENCE_OF_STATEMENTS]
+ -- end if;
+
+ -- The caller has checked that the initial token is IF (or in the error
+ -- case of a mysterious THEN, the initial token may simply be THEN, in
+ -- which case, no condition (or IF) was scanned).
+
+ -- Error recovery: can raise Error_Resync
+
+ function P_If_Statement return Node_Id is
+ If_Node : Node_Id;
+ Elsif_Node : Node_Id;
+ Loc : Source_Ptr;
+
+ procedure Add_Elsif_Part;
+ -- An internal procedure used to scan out a single ELSIF part. On entry
+ -- the ELSIF (or an ELSE which has been determined should be ELSIF) is
+ -- scanned out and is in Prev_Token.
+
+ procedure Check_If_Column;
+ -- An internal procedure used to check that THEN, ELSE, or ELSIF
+ -- appear in the right place if column checking is enabled (i.e. if
+ -- they are the first token on the line, then they must appear in
+ -- the same column as the opening IF).
+
+ procedure Check_Then_Column;
+ -- This procedure carries out the style checks for a THEN token
+ -- Note that the caller has set Loc to the Source_Ptr value for
+ -- the previous IF or ELSIF token. These checks apply only to a
+ -- THEN at the start of a line.
+
+ function Else_Should_Be_Elsif return Boolean;
+ -- An internal routine used to do a special error recovery check when
+ -- an ELSE is encountered. It determines if the ELSE should be treated
+ -- as an ELSIF. A positive decision (TRUE returned, is made if the ELSE
+ -- is followed by a sequence of tokens, starting on the same line as
+ -- the ELSE, which are not expression terminators, followed by a THEN.
+ -- On entry, the ELSE has been scanned out.
+
+ procedure Add_Elsif_Part is
+ begin
+ if No (Elsif_Parts (If_Node)) then
+ Set_Elsif_Parts (If_Node, New_List);
+ end if;
+
+ Elsif_Node := New_Node (N_Elsif_Part, Prev_Token_Ptr);
+ Loc := Prev_Token_Ptr;
+ Set_Condition (Elsif_Node, P_Condition);
+ Check_Then_Column;
+ Then_Scan;
+ Set_Then_Statements
+ (Elsif_Node, P_Sequence_Of_Statements (SS_Eftm_Eltm_Sreq));
+ Append (Elsif_Node, Elsif_Parts (If_Node));
+ end Add_Elsif_Part;
+
+ procedure Check_If_Column is
+ begin
+ if Style.RM_Column_Check and then Token_Is_At_Start_Of_Line
+ and then Start_Column /= Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Ecol
+ then
+ Error_Msg_Col := Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Ecol;
+ Error_Msg_SC ("(style) this token should be@");
+ end if;
+ end Check_If_Column;
+
+ procedure Check_Then_Column is
+ begin
+ if Token_Is_At_Start_Of_Line and then Token = Tok_Then then
+ Check_If_Column;
+
+ if Style_Check then
+ Style.Check_Then (Loc);
+ end if;
+ end if;
+ end Check_Then_Column;
+
+ function Else_Should_Be_Elsif return Boolean is
+ Scan_State : Saved_Scan_State;
+
+ begin
+ if Token_Is_At_Start_Of_Line then
+ return False;
+
+ else
+ Save_Scan_State (Scan_State);
+
+ loop
+ if Token in Token_Class_Eterm then
+ Restore_Scan_State (Scan_State);
+ return False;
+ else
+ Scan; -- past non-expression terminating token
+
+ if Token = Tok_Then then
+ Restore_Scan_State (Scan_State);
+ return True;
+ end if;
+ end if;
+ end loop;
+ end if;
+ end Else_Should_Be_Elsif;
+
+ -- Start of processing for P_If_Statement
+
+ begin
+ If_Node := New_Node (N_If_Statement, Token_Ptr);
+
+ Push_Scope_Stack;
+ Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Etyp := E_If;
+ Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Ecol := Start_Column;
+ Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Sloc := Token_Ptr;
+ Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Labl := Error;
+ Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Node := If_Node;
+
+ if Token = Tok_If then
+ Loc := Token_Ptr;
+ Scan; -- past IF
+ Set_Condition (If_Node, P_Condition);
+
+ -- Deal with misuse of IF expression => used instead
+ -- of WHEN expression =>
+
+ if Token = Tok_Arrow then
+ Error_Msg_SC ("THEN expected");
+ Scan; -- past the arrow
+ Pop_Scope_Stack; -- remove unneeded entry
+ raise Error_Resync;
+ end if;
+
+ Check_Then_Column;
+
+ else
+ Error_Msg_SC ("no IF for this THEN");
+ Set_Condition (If_Node, Error);
+ end if;
+
+ Then_Scan;
+
+ Set_Then_Statements
+ (If_Node, P_Sequence_Of_Statements (SS_Eftm_Eltm_Sreq));
+
+ -- This loop scans out else and elsif parts
+
+ loop
+ if Token = Tok_Elsif then
+ Check_If_Column;
+
+ if Present (Else_Statements (If_Node)) then
+ Error_Msg_SP ("ELSIF cannot appear after ELSE");
+ end if;
+
+ Scan; -- past ELSIF
+ Add_Elsif_Part;
+
+ elsif Token = Tok_Else then
+ Check_If_Column;
+ Scan; -- past ELSE
+
+ if Else_Should_Be_Elsif then
+ Error_Msg_SP ("ELSE should be ELSIF");
+ Add_Elsif_Part;
+
+ else
+ -- Here we have an else that really is an else
+
+ if Present (Else_Statements (If_Node)) then
+ Error_Msg_SP ("only one ELSE part allowed");
+ Append_List
+ (P_Sequence_Of_Statements (SS_Eftm_Eltm_Sreq),
+ Else_Statements (If_Node));
+ else
+ Set_Else_Statements
+ (If_Node, P_Sequence_Of_Statements (SS_Eftm_Eltm_Sreq));
+ end if;
+ end if;
+
+ -- If anything other than ELSE or ELSIF, exit the loop. The token
+ -- had better be END (and in fact it had better be END IF), but
+ -- we will let End_Statements take care of checking that.
+
+ else
+ exit;
+ end if;
+ end loop;
+
+ End_Statements;
+ return If_Node;
+
+ end P_If_Statement;
+
+ --------------------
+ -- 5.3 Condition --
+ --------------------
+
+ -- CONDITION ::= boolean_EXPRESSION
+
+ function P_Condition return Node_Id is
+ Cond : Node_Id;
+
+ begin
+ Cond := P_Expression_No_Right_Paren;
+
+ -- It is never possible for := to follow a condition, so if we get
+ -- a := we assume it is a mistyped equality. Note that we do not try
+ -- to reconstruct the tree correctly in this case, but we do at least
+ -- give an accurate error message.
+
+ if Token = Tok_Colon_Equal then
+ while Token = Tok_Colon_Equal loop
+ Error_Msg_SC (""":="" should be ""=""");
+ Scan; -- past junk :=
+ Discard_Junk_Node (P_Expression_No_Right_Paren);
+ end loop;
+
+ return Cond;
+
+ -- Otherwise check for redundant parens
+
+ else
+ if Style_Check
+ and then Paren_Count (Cond) > 0
+ then
+ Style.Check_Xtra_Parens (First_Sloc (Cond));
+ end if;
+
+ -- And return the result
+
+ return Cond;
+ end if;
+ end P_Condition;
+
+ -------------------------
+ -- 5.4 Case Statement --
+ -------------------------
+
+ -- CASE_STATEMENT ::=
+ -- case EXPRESSION is
+ -- CASE_STATEMENT_ALTERNATIVE
+ -- {CASE_STATEMENT_ALTERNATIVE}
+ -- end case;
+
+ -- The caller has checked that the first token is CASE
+
+ -- Can raise Error_Resync
+
+ function P_Case_Statement return Node_Id is
+ Case_Node : Node_Id;
+ Alternatives_List : List_Id;
+ First_When_Loc : Source_Ptr;
+
+ begin
+ Case_Node := New_Node (N_Case_Statement, Token_Ptr);
+
+ Push_Scope_Stack;
+ Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Etyp := E_Case;
+ Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Ecol := Start_Column;
+ Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Sloc := Token_Ptr;
+ Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Labl := Error;
+ Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Node := Case_Node;
+
+ Scan; -- past CASE
+ Set_Expression (Case_Node, P_Expression_No_Right_Paren);
+ TF_Is;
+
+ -- Prepare to parse case statement alternatives
+
+ Alternatives_List := New_List;
+ P_Pragmas_Opt (Alternatives_List);
+ First_When_Loc := Token_Ptr;
+
+ -- Loop through case statement alternatives
+
+ loop
+ -- If we have a WHEN or OTHERS, then that's fine keep going. Note
+ -- that it is a semantic check to ensure the proper use of OTHERS
+
+ if Token = Tok_When or else Token = Tok_Others then
+ Append (P_Case_Statement_Alternative, Alternatives_List);
+
+ -- If we have an END, then probably we are at the end of the case
+ -- but we only exit if Check_End thinks the END was reasonable.
+
+ elsif Token = Tok_End then
+ exit when Check_End;
+
+ -- Here if token is other than WHEN, OTHERS or END. We definitely
+ -- have an error, but the question is whether or not to get out of
+ -- the case statement. We don't want to get out early, or we will
+ -- get a slew of junk error messages for subsequent when tokens.
+
+ -- If the token is not at the start of the line, or if it is indented
+ -- with respect to the current case statement, then the best guess is
+ -- that we are still supposed to be inside the case statement. We
+ -- complain about the missing WHEN, and discard the junk statements.
+
+ elsif not Token_Is_At_Start_Of_Line
+ or else Start_Column > Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Ecol
+ then
+ Error_Msg_BC ("WHEN (case statement alternative) expected");
+
+ -- Here is a possibility for infinite looping if we don't make
+ -- progress. So try to process statements, otherwise exit
+
+ declare
+ Error_Ptr : constant Source_Ptr := Scan_Ptr;
+ begin
+ Discard_Junk_List (P_Sequence_Of_Statements (SS_Whtm));
+ exit when Scan_Ptr = Error_Ptr and then Check_End;
+ end;
+
+ -- Here we have a junk token at the start of the line and it is
+ -- not indented. If Check_End thinks there is a missing END, then
+ -- we will get out of the case, otherwise we keep going.
+
+ else
+ exit when Check_End;
+ end if;
+ end loop;
+
+ -- Make sure we have at least one alternative
+
+ if No (First_Non_Pragma (Alternatives_List)) then
+ Error_Msg
+ ("WHEN expected, must have at least one alternative in case",
+ First_When_Loc);
+ return Error;
+
+ else
+ Set_Alternatives (Case_Node, Alternatives_List);
+ return Case_Node;
+ end if;
+ end P_Case_Statement;
+
+ -------------------------------------
+ -- 5.4 Case Statement Alternative --
+ -------------------------------------
+
+ -- CASE_STATEMENT_ALTERNATIVE ::=
+ -- when DISCRETE_CHOICE_LIST =>
+ -- SEQUENCE_OF_STATEMENTS
+
+ -- The caller has checked that the initial token is WHEN or OTHERS
+ -- Error recovery: can raise Error_Resync
+
+ function P_Case_Statement_Alternative return Node_Id is
+ Case_Alt_Node : Node_Id;
+
+ begin
+ if Style_Check then
+ Style.Check_Indentation;
+ end if;
+
+ Case_Alt_Node := New_Node (N_Case_Statement_Alternative, Token_Ptr);
+ T_When; -- past WHEN (or give error in OTHERS case)
+ Set_Discrete_Choices (Case_Alt_Node, P_Discrete_Choice_List);
+ TF_Arrow;
+ Set_Statements (Case_Alt_Node, P_Sequence_Of_Statements (SS_Sreq_Whtm));
+ return Case_Alt_Node;
+ end P_Case_Statement_Alternative;
+
+ -------------------------
+ -- 5.5 Loop Statement --
+ -------------------------
+
+ -- LOOP_STATEMENT ::=
+ -- [LOOP_STATEMENT_IDENTIFIER:]
+ -- [ITERATION_SCHEME] loop
+ -- SEQUENCE_OF_STATEMENTS
+ -- end loop [loop_IDENTIFIER];
+
+ -- ITERATION_SCHEME ::=
+ -- while CONDITION
+ -- | for LOOP_PARAMETER_SPECIFICATION
+
+ -- The parsing of loop statements is handled by one of three functions
+ -- P_Loop_Statement, P_For_Statement or P_While_Statement depending
+ -- on the initial keyword in the construct (excluding the identifier)
+
+ -- P_Loop_Statement
+
+ -- This function parses the case where no iteration scheme is present
+
+ -- The caller has checked that the initial token is LOOP. The parameter
+ -- is the node identifiers for the loop label if any (or is set to Empty
+ -- if there is no loop label).
+
+ -- Error recovery : cannot raise Error_Resync
+
+ function P_Loop_Statement (Loop_Name : Node_Id := Empty) return Node_Id is
+ Loop_Node : Node_Id;
+ Created_Name : Node_Id;
+
+ begin
+ Push_Scope_Stack;
+ Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Labl := Loop_Name;
+ Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Ecol := Start_Column;
+ Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Sloc := Token_Ptr;
+ Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Etyp := E_Loop;
+
+ Loop_Node := New_Node (N_Loop_Statement, Token_Ptr);
+ TF_Loop;
+
+ if No (Loop_Name) then
+ Created_Name :=
+ Make_Identifier (Sloc (Loop_Node),
+ Chars => Set_Loop_Block_Name ('L'));
+ Set_Comes_From_Source (Created_Name, False);
+ Set_Has_Created_Identifier (Loop_Node, True);
+ Set_Identifier (Loop_Node, Created_Name);
+ Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Labl := Created_Name;
+ else
+ Set_Identifier (Loop_Node, Loop_Name);
+ end if;
+
+ Append_Elmt (Loop_Node, Label_List);
+ Set_Statements (Loop_Node, P_Sequence_Of_Statements (SS_Sreq));
+ End_Statements (Loop_Node);
+ return Loop_Node;
+ end P_Loop_Statement;
+
+ -- P_For_Statement
+
+ -- This function parses a loop statement with a FOR iteration scheme
+
+ -- The caller has checked that the initial token is FOR. The parameter
+ -- is the node identifier for the block label if any (or is set to Empty
+ -- if there is no block label).
+
+ -- Note: the caller fills in the Identifier field if a label was present
+
+ -- Error recovery: can raise Error_Resync
+
+ function P_For_Statement (Loop_Name : Node_Id := Empty) return Node_Id is
+ Loop_Node : Node_Id;
+ Iter_Scheme_Node : Node_Id;
+ Loop_For_Flag : Boolean;
+ Created_Name : Node_Id;
+
+ begin
+ Push_Scope_Stack;
+ Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Labl := Loop_Name;
+ Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Ecol := Start_Column;
+ Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Sloc := Token_Ptr;
+ Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Etyp := E_Loop;
+
+ Loop_For_Flag := (Prev_Token = Tok_Loop);
+ Scan; -- past FOR
+ Iter_Scheme_Node := New_Node (N_Iteration_Scheme, Token_Ptr);
+ Set_Loop_Parameter_Specification
+ (Iter_Scheme_Node, P_Loop_Parameter_Specification);
+
+ -- The following is a special test so that a miswritten for loop such
+ -- as "loop for I in 1..10;" is handled nicely, without making an extra
+ -- entry in the scope stack. We don't bother to actually fix up the
+ -- tree in this case since it's not worth the effort. Instead we just
+ -- eat up the loop junk, leaving the entry for what now looks like an
+ -- unmodified loop intact.
+
+ if Loop_For_Flag and then Token = Tok_Semicolon then
+ Error_Msg_SC ("LOOP belongs here, not before FOR");
+ Pop_Scope_Stack;
+ return Error;
+
+ -- Normal case
+
+ else
+ Loop_Node := New_Node (N_Loop_Statement, Token_Ptr);
+
+ if No (Loop_Name) then
+ Created_Name :=
+ Make_Identifier (Sloc (Loop_Node),
+ Chars => Set_Loop_Block_Name ('L'));
+ Set_Comes_From_Source (Created_Name, False);
+ Set_Has_Created_Identifier (Loop_Node, True);
+ Set_Identifier (Loop_Node, Created_Name);
+ Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Labl := Created_Name;
+ else
+ Set_Identifier (Loop_Node, Loop_Name);
+ end if;
+
+ TF_Loop;
+ Set_Statements (Loop_Node, P_Sequence_Of_Statements (SS_Sreq));
+ End_Statements (Loop_Node);
+ Set_Iteration_Scheme (Loop_Node, Iter_Scheme_Node);
+ Append_Elmt (Loop_Node, Label_List);
+ return Loop_Node;
+ end if;
+ end P_For_Statement;
+
+ -- P_While_Statement
+
+ -- This procedure scans a loop statement with a WHILE iteration scheme
+
+ -- The caller has checked that the initial token is WHILE. The parameter
+ -- is the node identifier for the block label if any (or is set to Empty
+ -- if there is no block label).
+
+ -- Error recovery: cannot raise Error_Resync
+
+ function P_While_Statement (Loop_Name : Node_Id := Empty) return Node_Id is
+ Loop_Node : Node_Id;
+ Iter_Scheme_Node : Node_Id;
+ Loop_While_Flag : Boolean;
+ Created_Name : Node_Id;
+
+ begin
+ Push_Scope_Stack;
+ Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Labl := Loop_Name;
+ Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Ecol := Start_Column;
+ Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Sloc := Token_Ptr;
+ Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Etyp := E_Loop;
+
+ Loop_While_Flag := (Prev_Token = Tok_Loop);
+ Iter_Scheme_Node := New_Node (N_Iteration_Scheme, Token_Ptr);
+ Scan; -- past WHILE
+ Set_Condition (Iter_Scheme_Node, P_Condition);
+
+ -- The following is a special test so that a miswritten for loop such
+ -- as "loop while I > 10;" is handled nicely, without making an extra
+ -- entry in the scope stack. We don't bother to actually fix up the
+ -- tree in this case since it's not worth the effort. Instead we just
+ -- eat up the loop junk, leaving the entry for what now looks like an
+ -- unmodified loop intact.
+
+ if Loop_While_Flag and then Token = Tok_Semicolon then
+ Error_Msg_SC ("LOOP belongs here, not before WHILE");
+ Pop_Scope_Stack;
+ return Error;
+
+ -- Normal case
+
+ else
+ Loop_Node := New_Node (N_Loop_Statement, Token_Ptr);
+ TF_Loop;
+
+ if No (Loop_Name) then
+ Created_Name :=
+ Make_Identifier (Sloc (Loop_Node),
+ Chars => Set_Loop_Block_Name ('L'));
+ Set_Comes_From_Source (Created_Name, False);
+ Set_Has_Created_Identifier (Loop_Node, True);
+ Set_Identifier (Loop_Node, Created_Name);
+ Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Labl := Created_Name;
+ else
+ Set_Identifier (Loop_Node, Loop_Name);
+ end if;
+
+ Set_Statements (Loop_Node, P_Sequence_Of_Statements (SS_Sreq));
+ End_Statements (Loop_Node);
+ Set_Iteration_Scheme (Loop_Node, Iter_Scheme_Node);
+ Append_Elmt (Loop_Node, Label_List);
+ return Loop_Node;
+ end if;
+ end P_While_Statement;
+
+ ---------------------------------------
+ -- 5.5 Loop Parameter Specification --
+ ---------------------------------------
+
+ -- LOOP_PARAMETER_SPECIFICATION ::=
+ -- DEFINING_IDENTIFIER in [reverse] DISCRETE_SUBTYPE_DEFINITION
+
+ -- Error recovery: cannot raise Error_Resync
+
+ function P_Loop_Parameter_Specification return Node_Id is
+ Loop_Param_Specification_Node : Node_Id;
+
+ ID_Node : Node_Id;
+ Scan_State : Saved_Scan_State;
+
+ begin
+ Loop_Param_Specification_Node :=
+ New_Node (N_Loop_Parameter_Specification, Token_Ptr);
+
+ Save_Scan_State (Scan_State);
+ ID_Node := P_Defining_Identifier (C_In);
+ Set_Defining_Identifier (Loop_Param_Specification_Node, ID_Node);
+
+ if Token = Tok_Left_Paren then
+ Error_Msg_SC ("subscripted loop parameter not allowed");
+ Restore_Scan_State (Scan_State);
+ Discard_Junk_Node (P_Name);
+
+ elsif Token = Tok_Dot then
+ Error_Msg_SC ("selected loop parameter not allowed");
+ Restore_Scan_State (Scan_State);
+ Discard_Junk_Node (P_Name);
+ end if;
+
+ T_In;
+
+ if Token = Tok_Reverse then
+ Scan; -- past REVERSE
+ Set_Reverse_Present (Loop_Param_Specification_Node, True);
+ end if;
+
+ Set_Discrete_Subtype_Definition
+ (Loop_Param_Specification_Node, P_Discrete_Subtype_Definition);
+ return Loop_Param_Specification_Node;
+
+ exception
+ when Error_Resync =>
+ return Error;
+ end P_Loop_Parameter_Specification;
+
+ --------------------------
+ -- 5.6 Block Statement --
+ --------------------------
+
+ -- BLOCK_STATEMENT ::=
+ -- [block_STATEMENT_IDENTIFIER:]
+ -- [declare
+ -- DECLARATIVE_PART]
+ -- begin
+ -- HANDLED_SEQUENCE_OF_STATEMENTS
+ -- end [block_IDENTIFIER];
+
+ -- The parsing of block statements is handled by one of the two functions
+ -- P_Declare_Statement or P_Begin_Statement depending on whether or not
+ -- a declare section is present
+
+ -- P_Declare_Statement
+
+ -- This function parses a block statement with DECLARE present
+
+ -- The caller has checked that the initial token is DECLARE
+
+ -- Error recovery: cannot raise Error_Resync
+
+ function P_Declare_Statement
+ (Block_Name : Node_Id := Empty)
+ return Node_Id
+ is
+ Block_Node : Node_Id;
+ Created_Name : Node_Id;
+
+ begin
+ Block_Node := New_Node (N_Block_Statement, Token_Ptr);
+
+ Push_Scope_Stack;
+ Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Etyp := E_Name;
+ Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Lreq := Present (Block_Name);
+ Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Ecol := Start_Column;
+ Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Labl := Block_Name;
+ Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Sloc := Token_Ptr;
+
+ Scan; -- past DECLARE
+
+ if No (Block_Name) then
+ Created_Name :=
+ Make_Identifier (Sloc (Block_Node),
+ Chars => Set_Loop_Block_Name ('B'));
+ Set_Comes_From_Source (Created_Name, False);
+ Set_Has_Created_Identifier (Block_Node, True);
+ Set_Identifier (Block_Node, Created_Name);
+ Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Labl := Created_Name;
+ else
+ Set_Identifier (Block_Node, Block_Name);
+ end if;
+
+ Append_Elmt (Block_Node, Label_List);
+ Parse_Decls_Begin_End (Block_Node);
+ return Block_Node;
+ end P_Declare_Statement;
+
+ -- P_Begin_Statement
+
+ -- This function parses a block statement with no DECLARE present
+
+ -- The caller has checked that the initial token is BEGIN
+
+ -- Error recovery: cannot raise Error_Resync
+
+ function P_Begin_Statement
+ (Block_Name : Node_Id := Empty)
+ return Node_Id
+ is
+ Block_Node : Node_Id;
+ Created_Name : Node_Id;
+
+ begin
+ Block_Node := New_Node (N_Block_Statement, Token_Ptr);
+
+ Push_Scope_Stack;
+ Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Etyp := E_Name;
+ Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Lreq := Present (Block_Name);
+ Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Ecol := Start_Column;
+ Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Labl := Block_Name;
+ Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Sloc := Token_Ptr;
+
+ if No (Block_Name) then
+ Created_Name :=
+ Make_Identifier (Sloc (Block_Node),
+ Chars => Set_Loop_Block_Name ('B'));
+ Set_Comes_From_Source (Created_Name, False);
+ Set_Has_Created_Identifier (Block_Node, True);
+ Set_Identifier (Block_Node, Created_Name);
+ Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Labl := Created_Name;
+ else
+ Set_Identifier (Block_Node, Block_Name);
+ end if;
+
+ Append_Elmt (Block_Node, Label_List);
+
+ Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Ecol := Start_Column;
+ Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Sloc := Token_Ptr;
+ Scan; -- past BEGIN
+ Set_Handled_Statement_Sequence
+ (Block_Node, P_Handled_Sequence_Of_Statements);
+ End_Statements (Handled_Statement_Sequence (Block_Node));
+ return Block_Node;
+ end P_Begin_Statement;
+
+ -------------------------
+ -- 5.7 Exit Statement --
+ -------------------------
+
+ -- EXIT_STATEMENT ::=
+ -- exit [loop_NAME] [when CONDITION];
+
+ -- The caller has checked that the initial token is EXIT
+
+ -- Error recovery: can raise Error_Resync
+
+ function P_Exit_Statement return Node_Id is
+ Exit_Node : Node_Id;
+
+ function Missing_Semicolon_On_Exit return Boolean;
+ -- This function deals with the following specialized situation
+ --
+ -- when 'x' =>
+ -- exit [identifier]
+ -- when 'y' =>
+ --
+ -- This looks like a messed up EXIT WHEN, when in fact the problem
+ -- is a missing semicolon. It is called with Token pointing to the
+ -- WHEN token, and returns True if a semicolon is missing before
+ -- the WHEN as in the above example.
+
+ -------------------------------
+ -- Missing_Semicolon_On_Exit --
+ -------------------------------
+
+ function Missing_Semicolon_On_Exit return Boolean is
+ State : Saved_Scan_State;
+
+ begin
+ if not Token_Is_At_Start_Of_Line then
+ return False;
+
+ elsif Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Etyp /= E_Case then
+ return False;
+
+ else
+ Save_Scan_State (State);
+ Scan; -- past WHEN
+ Scan; -- past token after WHEN
+
+ if Token = Tok_Arrow then
+ Restore_Scan_State (State);
+ return True;
+ else
+ Restore_Scan_State (State);
+ return False;
+ end if;
+ end if;
+ end Missing_Semicolon_On_Exit;
+
+ -- Start of processing for P_Exit_Statement
+
+ begin
+ Exit_Node := New_Node (N_Exit_Statement, Token_Ptr);
+ Scan; -- past EXIT
+
+ if Token = Tok_Identifier then
+ Set_Name (Exit_Node, P_Qualified_Simple_Name);
+
+ elsif Style_Check then
+ -- This EXIT has no name, so check that
+ -- the innermost loop is unnamed too.
+
+ Check_No_Exit_Name :
+ for J in reverse 1 .. Scope.Last loop
+ if Scope.Table (J).Etyp = E_Loop then
+ if Present (Scope.Table (J).Labl)
+ and then Comes_From_Source (Scope.Table (J).Labl)
+ then
+ -- Innermost loop in fact had a name, style check fails
+
+ Style.No_Exit_Name (Scope.Table (J).Labl);
+ end if;
+
+ exit Check_No_Exit_Name;
+ end if;
+ end loop Check_No_Exit_Name;
+ end if;
+
+ if Token = Tok_When and then not Missing_Semicolon_On_Exit then
+ Scan; -- past WHEN
+ Set_Condition (Exit_Node, P_Condition);
+
+ -- Allow IF instead of WHEN, giving error message
+
+ elsif Token = Tok_If then
+ T_When;
+ Scan; -- past IF used in place of WHEN
+ Set_Condition (Exit_Node, P_Expression_No_Right_Paren);
+ end if;
+
+ TF_Semicolon;
+ return Exit_Node;
+ end P_Exit_Statement;
+
+ -------------------------
+ -- 5.8 Goto Statement --
+ -------------------------
+
+ -- GOTO_STATEMENT ::= goto label_NAME;
+
+ -- The caller has checked that the initial token is GOTO (or TO in the
+ -- error case where GO and TO were incorrectly separated).
+
+ -- Error recovery: can raise Error_Resync
+
+ function P_Goto_Statement return Node_Id is
+ Goto_Node : Node_Id;
+
+ begin
+ Goto_Node := New_Node (N_Goto_Statement, Token_Ptr);
+ Scan; -- past GOTO (or TO)
+ Set_Name (Goto_Node, P_Qualified_Simple_Name_Resync);
+ Append_Elmt (Goto_Node, Goto_List);
+ No_Constraint;
+ TF_Semicolon;
+ return Goto_Node;
+ end P_Goto_Statement;
+
+ ---------------------------
+ -- Parse_Decls_Begin_End --
+ ---------------------------
+
+ -- This function parses the construct:
+
+ -- DECLARATIVE_PART
+ -- begin
+ -- HANDLED_SEQUENCE_OF_STATEMENTS
+ -- end [NAME];
+
+ -- The caller has built the scope stack entry, and created the node to
+ -- whose Declarations and Handled_Statement_Sequence fields are to be
+ -- set. On return these fields are filled in (except in the case of a
+ -- task body, where the handled statement sequence is optional, and may
+ -- thus be Empty), and the scan is positioned past the End sequence.
+
+ -- If the BEGIN is missing, then the parent node is used to help construct
+ -- an appropriate missing BEGIN message. Possibilities for the parent are:
+
+ -- N_Block_Statement declare block
+ -- N_Entry_Body entry body
+ -- N_Package_Body package body (begin part optional)
+ -- N_Subprogram_Body procedure or function body
+ -- N_Task_Body task body
+
+ -- Note: in the case of a block statement, there is definitely a DECLARE
+ -- present (because a Begin statement without a DECLARE is handled by the
+ -- P_Begin_Statement procedure, which does not call Parse_Decls_Begin_End.
+
+ -- Error recovery: cannot raise Error_Resync
+
+ procedure Parse_Decls_Begin_End (Parent : Node_Id) is
+ Body_Decl : Node_Id;
+ Body_Sloc : Source_Ptr;
+ Decls : List_Id;
+ Decl : Node_Id;
+ Parent_Nkind : Node_Kind;
+ Spec_Node : Node_Id;
+ HSS : Node_Id;
+
+ procedure Missing_Begin (Msg : String);
+ -- Called to post a missing begin message. In the normal case this is
+ -- posted at the start of the current token. A special case arises when
+ -- P_Declarative_Items has previously found a missing begin, in which
+ -- case we replace the original error message.
+
+ procedure Set_Null_HSS (Parent : Node_Id);
+ -- Construct an empty handled statement sequence and install in Parent
+ -- Leaves HSS set to reference the newly constructed statement sequence.
+
+ -------------------
+ -- Missing_Begin --
+ -------------------
+
+ procedure Missing_Begin (Msg : String) is
+ begin
+ if Missing_Begin_Msg = No_Error_Msg then
+ Error_Msg_BC (Msg);
+ else
+ Change_Error_Text (Missing_Begin_Msg, Msg);
+
+ -- Purge any messages issued after than, since a missing begin
+ -- can cause a lot of havoc, and it is better not to dump these
+ -- cascaded messages on the user.
+
+ Purge_Messages (Get_Location (Missing_Begin_Msg), Prev_Token_Ptr);
+ end if;
+ end Missing_Begin;
+
+ ------------------
+ -- Set_Null_HSS --
+ ------------------
+
+ procedure Set_Null_HSS (Parent : Node_Id) is
+ Null_Stm : Node_Id;
+
+ begin
+ Null_Stm :=
+ Make_Null_Statement (Token_Ptr);
+ Set_Comes_From_Source (Null_Stm, False);
+
+ HSS :=
+ Make_Handled_Sequence_Of_Statements (Token_Ptr,
+ Statements => New_List (Null_Stm));
+ Set_Comes_From_Source (HSS, False);
+
+ Set_Handled_Statement_Sequence (Parent, HSS);
+ end Set_Null_HSS;
+
+ -- Start of processing for Parse_Decls_Begin_End
+
+ begin
+ Decls := P_Declarative_Part;
+
+ -- Check for misplacement of later vs basic declarations in Ada 83
+
+ if Ada_Version = Ada_83 then
+ Decl := First (Decls);
+
+ -- Loop through sequence of basic declarative items
+
+ Outer : while Present (Decl) loop
+ if Nkind (Decl) /= N_Subprogram_Body
+ and then Nkind (Decl) /= N_Package_Body
+ and then Nkind (Decl) /= N_Task_Body
+ and then Nkind (Decl) not in N_Body_Stub
+ then
+ Next (Decl);
+
+ -- Once a body is encountered, we only allow later declarative
+ -- items. The inner loop checks the rest of the list.
+
+ else
+ Body_Sloc := Sloc (Decl);
+
+ Inner : while Present (Decl) loop
+ if Nkind (Decl) not in N_Later_Decl_Item
+ and then Nkind (Decl) /= N_Pragma
+ then
+ if Ada_Version = Ada_83 then
+ Error_Msg_Sloc := Body_Sloc;
+ Error_Msg_N
+ ("(Ada 83) decl cannot appear after body#", Decl);
+ end if;
+ end if;
+
+ Next (Decl);
+ end loop Inner;
+ end if;
+ end loop Outer;
+ end if;
+
+ -- Here is where we deal with the case of IS used instead of semicolon.
+ -- Specifically, if the last declaration in the declarative part is a
+ -- subprogram body still marked as having a bad IS, then this is where
+ -- we decide that the IS should really have been a semicolon and that
+ -- the body should have been a declaration. Note that if the bad IS
+ -- had turned out to be OK (i.e. a decent begin/end was found for it),
+ -- then the Bad_Is_Detected flag would have been reset by now.
+
+ Body_Decl := Last (Decls);
+
+ if Present (Body_Decl)
+ and then Nkind (Body_Decl) = N_Subprogram_Body
+ and then Bad_Is_Detected (Body_Decl)
+ then
+ -- OK, we have the case of a bad IS, so we need to fix up the tree.
+ -- What we have now is a subprogram body with attached declarations
+ -- and a possible statement sequence.
+
+ -- First step is to take the declarations that were part of the bogus
+ -- subprogram body and append them to the outer declaration chain.
+ -- In other words we append them past the body (which we will later
+ -- convert into a declaration).
+
+ Append_List (Declarations (Body_Decl), Decls);
+
+ -- Now take the handled statement sequence of the bogus body and
+ -- set it as the statement sequence for the outer construct. Note
+ -- that it may be empty (we specially allowed a missing BEGIN for
+ -- a subprogram body marked as having a bad IS -- see below).
+
+ Set_Handled_Statement_Sequence (Parent,
+ Handled_Statement_Sequence (Body_Decl));
+
+ -- Next step is to convert the old body node to a declaration node
+
+ Spec_Node := Specification (Body_Decl);
+ Change_Node (Body_Decl, N_Subprogram_Declaration);
+ Set_Specification (Body_Decl, Spec_Node);
+
+ -- Final step is to put the declarations for the parent where
+ -- they belong, and then fall through the IF to scan out the
+ -- END statements.
+
+ Set_Declarations (Parent, Decls);
+
+ -- This is the normal case (i.e. any case except the bad IS case)
+ -- If we have a BEGIN, then scan out the sequence of statements, and
+ -- also reset the expected column for the END to match the BEGIN.
+
+ else
+ Set_Declarations (Parent, Decls);
+
+ if Token = Tok_Begin then
+ if Style_Check then
+ Style.Check_Indentation;
+ end if;
+
+ Error_Msg_Col := Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Ecol;
+
+ if Style.RM_Column_Check
+ and then Token_Is_At_Start_Of_Line
+ and then Start_Column /= Error_Msg_Col
+ then
+ Error_Msg_SC ("(style) BEGIN in wrong column, should be@");
+
+ else
+ Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Ecol := Start_Column;
+ end if;
+
+ Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Sloc := Token_Ptr;
+ Scan; -- past BEGIN
+ Set_Handled_Statement_Sequence (Parent,
+ P_Handled_Sequence_Of_Statements);
+
+ -- No BEGIN present
+
+ else
+ Parent_Nkind := Nkind (Parent);
+
+ -- A special check for the missing IS case. If we have a
+ -- subprogram body that was marked as having a suspicious
+ -- IS, and the current token is END, then we simply confirm
+ -- the suspicion, and do not require a BEGIN to be present
+
+ if Parent_Nkind = N_Subprogram_Body
+ and then Token = Tok_End
+ and then Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Etyp = E_Suspicious_Is
+ then
+ Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Etyp := E_Bad_Is;
+
+ -- Otherwise BEGIN is not required for a package body, so we
+ -- don't mind if it is missing, but we do construct a dummy
+ -- one (so that we have somewhere to set End_Label).
+
+ -- However if we have something other than a BEGIN which
+ -- looks like it might be statements, then we signal a missing
+ -- BEGIN for these cases as well. We define "something which
+ -- looks like it might be statements" as a token other than
+ -- END, EOF, or a token which starts declarations.
+
+ elsif Parent_Nkind = N_Package_Body
+ and then (Token = Tok_End
+ or else Token = Tok_EOF
+ or else Token in Token_Class_Declk)
+ then
+ Set_Null_HSS (Parent);
+
+ -- These are cases in which a BEGIN is required and not present
+
+ else
+ Set_Null_HSS (Parent);
+
+ -- Prepare to issue error message
+
+ Error_Msg_Sloc := Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Sloc;
+ Error_Msg_Node_1 := Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Labl;
+
+ -- Now issue appropriate message
+
+ if Parent_Nkind = N_Block_Statement then
+ Missing_Begin ("missing BEGIN for DECLARE#!");
+
+ elsif Parent_Nkind = N_Entry_Body then
+ Missing_Begin ("missing BEGIN for ENTRY#!");
+
+ elsif Parent_Nkind = N_Subprogram_Body then
+ if Nkind (Specification (Parent))
+ = N_Function_Specification
+ then
+ Missing_Begin ("missing BEGIN for function&#!");
+ else
+ Missing_Begin ("missing BEGIN for procedure&#!");
+ end if;
+
+ -- The case for package body arises only when
+ -- we have possible statement junk present.
+
+ elsif Parent_Nkind = N_Package_Body then
+ Missing_Begin ("missing BEGIN for package body&#!");
+
+ else
+ pragma Assert (Parent_Nkind = N_Task_Body);
+ Missing_Begin ("missing BEGIN for task body&#!");
+ end if;
+
+ -- Here we pick up the statements after the BEGIN that
+ -- should have been present but was not. We don't insist
+ -- on statements being present if P_Declarative_Part had
+ -- already found a missing BEGIN, since it might have
+ -- swallowed a lone statement into the declarative part.
+
+ if Missing_Begin_Msg /= No_Error_Msg
+ and then Token = Tok_End
+ then
+ null;
+ else
+ Set_Handled_Statement_Sequence (Parent,
+ P_Handled_Sequence_Of_Statements);
+ end if;
+ end if;
+ end if;
+ end if;
+
+ -- Here with declarations and handled statement sequence scanned
+
+ if Present (Handled_Statement_Sequence (Parent)) then
+ End_Statements (Handled_Statement_Sequence (Parent));
+ else
+ End_Statements;
+ end if;
+
+ -- We know that End_Statements removed an entry from the scope stack
+ -- (because it is required to do so under all circumstances). We can
+ -- therefore reference the entry it removed one past the stack top.
+ -- What we are interested in is whether it was a case of a bad IS.
+
+ if Scope.Table (Scope.Last + 1).Etyp = E_Bad_Is then
+ Error_Msg ("|IS should be "";""", Scope.Table (Scope.Last + 1).S_Is);
+ Set_Bad_Is_Detected (Parent, True);
+ end if;
+
+ end Parse_Decls_Begin_End;
+
+ -------------------------
+ -- Set_Loop_Block_Name --
+ -------------------------
+
+ function Set_Loop_Block_Name (L : Character) return Name_Id is
+ begin
+ Name_Buffer (1) := L;
+ Name_Buffer (2) := '_';
+ Name_Len := 2;
+ Loop_Block_Count := Loop_Block_Count + 1;
+ Add_Nat_To_Name_Buffer (Loop_Block_Count);
+ return Name_Find;
+ end Set_Loop_Block_Name;
+
+ ---------------
+ -- Then_Scan --
+ ---------------
+
+ procedure Then_Scan is
+ begin
+ TF_Then;
+
+ while Token = Tok_Then loop
+ Error_Msg_SC ("redundant THEN");
+ TF_Then;
+ end loop;
+
+ if Token = Tok_And or else Token = Tok_Or then
+ Error_Msg_SC ("unexpected logical operator");
+ Scan; -- past logical operator
+
+ if (Prev_Token = Tok_And and then Token = Tok_Then)
+ or else
+ (Prev_Token = Tok_Or and then Token = Tok_Else)
+ then
+ Scan;
+ end if;
+
+ Discard_Junk_Node (P_Expression);
+ end if;
+
+ if Token = Tok_Then then
+ Scan;
+ end if;
+ end Then_Scan;
+
+end Ch5;