aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/gcc-4.2.1/gcc/ada/a-chtgop.adb
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc-4.2.1/gcc/ada/a-chtgop.adb')
-rw-r--r--gcc-4.2.1/gcc/ada/a-chtgop.adb731
1 files changed, 731 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gcc-4.2.1/gcc/ada/a-chtgop.adb b/gcc-4.2.1/gcc/ada/a-chtgop.adb
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..137b27c00
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc-4.2.1/gcc/ada/a-chtgop.adb
@@ -0,0 +1,731 @@
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+-- --
+-- GNAT LIBRARY COMPONENTS --
+-- --
+-- A D A . C O N T A I N E R S . --
+-- H A S H _ T A B L E S . G E N E R I C _ O P E R A T I O N S --
+-- --
+-- B o d y --
+-- --
+-- Copyright (C) 2004-2005, Free Software Foundation, Inc. --
+-- --
+-- GNAT is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under --
+-- terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Soft- --
+-- ware Foundation; either version 2, or (at your option) any later ver- --
+-- sion. GNAT is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITH- --
+-- OUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY --
+-- or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License --
+-- for more details. You should have received a copy of the GNU General --
+-- Public License distributed with GNAT; see file COPYING. If not, write --
+-- to the Free Software Foundation, 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, --
+-- Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA. --
+-- --
+-- As a special exception, if other files instantiate generics from this --
+-- unit, or you link this unit with other files to produce an executable, --
+-- this unit does not by itself cause the resulting executable to be --
+-- covered by the GNU General Public License. This exception does not --
+-- however invalidate any other reasons why the executable file might be --
+-- covered by the GNU Public License. --
+-- --
+-- This unit was originally developed by Matthew J Heaney. --
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+-- This body needs commenting ???
+
+with Ada.Containers.Prime_Numbers;
+with Ada.Unchecked_Deallocation;
+
+with System; use type System.Address;
+
+package body Ada.Containers.Hash_Tables.Generic_Operations is
+
+ procedure Free is
+ new Ada.Unchecked_Deallocation (Buckets_Type, Buckets_Access);
+
+ ------------
+ -- Adjust --
+ ------------
+
+ procedure Adjust (HT : in out Hash_Table_Type) is
+ Src_Buckets : constant Buckets_Access := HT.Buckets;
+ N : constant Count_Type := HT.Length;
+ Src_Node : Node_Access;
+ Dst_Prev : Node_Access;
+
+ begin
+ HT.Buckets := null;
+ HT.Length := 0;
+
+ if N = 0 then
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ HT.Buckets := new Buckets_Type (Src_Buckets'Range);
+ -- TODO: allocate minimum size req'd. (See note below.)
+
+ -- NOTE: see note below about these comments.
+ -- Probably we have to duplicate the Size (Src), too, in order
+ -- to guarantee that
+
+ -- Dst := Src;
+ -- Dst = Src is true
+
+ -- The only quirk is that we depend on the hash value of a dst key
+ -- to be the same as the src key from which it was copied.
+ -- If we relax the requirement that the hash value must be the
+ -- same, then of course we can't guarantee that following
+ -- assignment that Dst = Src is true ???
+ --
+ -- NOTE: 17 Apr 2005
+ -- What I said above is no longer true. The semantics of (map) equality
+ -- changed, such that we use key in the left map to look up the
+ -- equivalent key in the right map, and then compare the elements (using
+ -- normal equality) of the equivalent keys. So it doesn't matter that
+ -- the maps have different capacities (i.e. the hash tables have
+ -- different lengths), since we just look up the key, irrespective of
+ -- its map's hash table length. All the RM says we're required to do
+ -- it arrange for the target map to "=" the source map following an
+ -- assignment (that is, following an Adjust), so it doesn't matter
+ -- what the capacity of the target map is. What I'll probably do is
+ -- allocate a new hash table that has the minimum size necessary,
+ -- instead of allocating a new hash table whose size exactly matches
+ -- that of the source. (See the assignment that immediately precedes
+ -- these comments.) What we really need is a special Assign operation
+ -- (not unlike what we have already for Vector) that allows the user to
+ -- choose the capacity of the target.
+ -- END NOTE.
+
+ for Src_Index in Src_Buckets'Range loop
+ Src_Node := Src_Buckets (Src_Index);
+
+ if Src_Node /= null then
+ declare
+ Dst_Node : constant Node_Access := Copy_Node (Src_Node);
+
+ -- See note above
+
+ pragma Assert (Index (HT, Dst_Node) = Src_Index);
+
+ begin
+ HT.Buckets (Src_Index) := Dst_Node;
+ HT.Length := HT.Length + 1;
+
+ Dst_Prev := Dst_Node;
+ end;
+
+ Src_Node := Next (Src_Node);
+ while Src_Node /= null loop
+ declare
+ Dst_Node : constant Node_Access := Copy_Node (Src_Node);
+
+ -- See note above
+
+ pragma Assert (Index (HT, Dst_Node) = Src_Index);
+
+ begin
+ Set_Next (Node => Dst_Prev, Next => Dst_Node);
+ HT.Length := HT.Length + 1;
+
+ Dst_Prev := Dst_Node;
+ end;
+
+ Src_Node := Next (Src_Node);
+ end loop;
+ end if;
+ end loop;
+
+ pragma Assert (HT.Length = N);
+ end Adjust;
+
+ --------------
+ -- Capacity --
+ --------------
+
+ function Capacity (HT : Hash_Table_Type) return Count_Type is
+ begin
+ if HT.Buckets = null then
+ return 0;
+ end if;
+
+ return HT.Buckets'Length;
+ end Capacity;
+
+ -----------
+ -- Clear --
+ -----------
+
+ procedure Clear (HT : in out Hash_Table_Type) is
+ Index : Hash_Type := 0;
+ Node : Node_Access;
+
+ begin
+ if HT.Busy > 0 then
+ raise Program_Error;
+ end if;
+
+ while HT.Length > 0 loop
+ while HT.Buckets (Index) = null loop
+ Index := Index + 1;
+ end loop;
+
+ declare
+ Bucket : Node_Access renames HT.Buckets (Index);
+ begin
+ loop
+ Node := Bucket;
+ Bucket := Next (Bucket);
+ HT.Length := HT.Length - 1;
+ Free (Node);
+ exit when Bucket = null;
+ end loop;
+ end;
+ end loop;
+ end Clear;
+
+ ---------------------------
+ -- Delete_Node_Sans_Free --
+ ---------------------------
+
+ procedure Delete_Node_Sans_Free
+ (HT : in out Hash_Table_Type;
+ X : Node_Access)
+ is
+ pragma Assert (X /= null);
+
+ Indx : Hash_Type;
+ Prev : Node_Access;
+ Curr : Node_Access;
+
+ begin
+ if HT.Length = 0 then
+ raise Program_Error;
+ end if;
+
+ Indx := Index (HT, X);
+ Prev := HT.Buckets (Indx);
+
+ if Prev = null then
+ raise Program_Error;
+ end if;
+
+ if Prev = X then
+ HT.Buckets (Indx) := Next (Prev);
+ HT.Length := HT.Length - 1;
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ if HT.Length = 1 then
+ raise Program_Error;
+ end if;
+
+ loop
+ Curr := Next (Prev);
+
+ if Curr = null then
+ raise Program_Error;
+ end if;
+
+ if Curr = X then
+ Set_Next (Node => Prev, Next => Next (Curr));
+ HT.Length := HT.Length - 1;
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ Prev := Curr;
+ end loop;
+ end Delete_Node_Sans_Free;
+
+ --------------
+ -- Finalize --
+ --------------
+
+ procedure Finalize (HT : in out Hash_Table_Type) is
+ begin
+ Clear (HT);
+ Free (HT.Buckets);
+ end Finalize;
+
+ -----------
+ -- First --
+ -----------
+
+ function First (HT : Hash_Table_Type) return Node_Access is
+ Indx : Hash_Type;
+
+ begin
+ if HT.Length = 0 then
+ return null;
+ end if;
+
+ Indx := HT.Buckets'First;
+ loop
+ if HT.Buckets (Indx) /= null then
+ return HT.Buckets (Indx);
+ end if;
+
+ Indx := Indx + 1;
+ end loop;
+ end First;
+
+ ---------------------
+ -- Free_Hash_Table --
+ ---------------------
+
+ procedure Free_Hash_Table (Buckets : in out Buckets_Access) is
+ Node : Node_Access;
+
+ begin
+ if Buckets = null then
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ for J in Buckets'Range loop
+ while Buckets (J) /= null loop
+ Node := Buckets (J);
+ Buckets (J) := Next (Node);
+ Free (Node);
+ end loop;
+ end loop;
+
+ Free (Buckets);
+ end Free_Hash_Table;
+
+ -------------------
+ -- Generic_Equal --
+ -------------------
+
+ function Generic_Equal
+ (L, R : Hash_Table_Type) return Boolean is
+
+ L_Index : Hash_Type;
+ L_Node : Node_Access;
+
+ N : Count_Type;
+
+ begin
+ if L'Address = R'Address then
+ return True;
+ end if;
+
+ if L.Length /= R.Length then
+ return False;
+ end if;
+
+ if L.Length = 0 then
+ return True;
+ end if;
+
+ L_Index := 0;
+
+ loop
+ L_Node := L.Buckets (L_Index);
+ exit when L_Node /= null;
+ L_Index := L_Index + 1;
+ end loop;
+
+ N := L.Length;
+
+ loop
+ if not Find (HT => R, Key => L_Node) then
+ return False;
+ end if;
+
+ N := N - 1;
+
+ L_Node := Next (L_Node);
+
+ if L_Node = null then
+ if N = 0 then
+ return True;
+ end if;
+
+ loop
+ L_Index := L_Index + 1;
+ L_Node := L.Buckets (L_Index);
+ exit when L_Node /= null;
+ end loop;
+ end if;
+ end loop;
+ end Generic_Equal;
+
+ -----------------------
+ -- Generic_Iteration --
+ -----------------------
+
+ procedure Generic_Iteration (HT : Hash_Table_Type) is
+ Busy : Natural renames HT'Unrestricted_Access.all.Busy;
+
+ begin
+ if HT.Length = 0 then
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ Busy := Busy + 1;
+
+ declare
+ Node : Node_Access;
+ begin
+ for Indx in HT.Buckets'Range loop
+ Node := HT.Buckets (Indx);
+ while Node /= null loop
+ Process (Node);
+ Node := Next (Node);
+ end loop;
+ end loop;
+ exception
+ when others =>
+ Busy := Busy - 1;
+ raise;
+ end;
+
+ Busy := Busy - 1;
+ end Generic_Iteration;
+
+ ------------------
+ -- Generic_Read --
+ ------------------
+
+ procedure Generic_Read
+ (Stream : access Root_Stream_Type'Class;
+ HT : out Hash_Table_Type)
+ is
+ X, Y : Node_Access;
+
+ Last, I : Hash_Type;
+ N, M : Count_Type'Base;
+
+ begin
+ Clear (HT);
+
+ Hash_Type'Read (Stream, Last);
+
+ Count_Type'Base'Read (Stream, N);
+ pragma Assert (N >= 0);
+
+ if N = 0 then
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ if HT.Buckets = null
+ or else HT.Buckets'Last /= Last
+ then
+ Free (HT.Buckets);
+ HT.Buckets := new Buckets_Type (0 .. Last);
+ end if;
+
+ -- TODO: should we rewrite this algorithm so that it doesn't
+ -- depend on preserving the exactly length of the hash table
+ -- array? We would prefer to not have to (re)allocate a
+ -- buckets array (the array that HT already has might be large
+ -- enough), and to not have to stream the count of the number
+ -- of nodes in each bucket. The algorithm below is vestigial,
+ -- as it was written prior to the meeting in Palma, when the
+ -- semantics of equality were changed (and which obviated the
+ -- need to preserve the hash table length).
+
+ loop
+ Hash_Type'Read (Stream, I);
+ pragma Assert (I in HT.Buckets'Range);
+ pragma Assert (HT.Buckets (I) = null);
+
+ Count_Type'Base'Read (Stream, M);
+ pragma Assert (M >= 1);
+ pragma Assert (M <= N);
+
+ HT.Buckets (I) := New_Node (Stream);
+ pragma Assert (HT.Buckets (I) /= null);
+ pragma Assert (Next (HT.Buckets (I)) = null);
+
+ Y := HT.Buckets (I);
+
+ HT.Length := HT.Length + 1;
+
+ for J in Count_Type range 2 .. M loop
+ X := New_Node (Stream);
+ pragma Assert (X /= null);
+ pragma Assert (Next (X) = null);
+
+ Set_Next (Node => Y, Next => X);
+ Y := X;
+
+ HT.Length := HT.Length + 1;
+ end loop;
+
+ N := N - M;
+
+ exit when N = 0;
+ end loop;
+ end Generic_Read;
+
+ -------------------
+ -- Generic_Write --
+ -------------------
+
+ procedure Generic_Write
+ (Stream : access Root_Stream_Type'Class;
+ HT : Hash_Table_Type)
+ is
+ M : Count_Type'Base;
+ X : Node_Access;
+
+ begin
+ if HT.Buckets = null then
+ Hash_Type'Write (Stream, 0);
+ else
+ Hash_Type'Write (Stream, HT.Buckets'Last);
+ end if;
+
+ Count_Type'Base'Write (Stream, HT.Length);
+
+ if HT.Length = 0 then
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ -- TODO: see note in Generic_Read???
+
+ for Indx in HT.Buckets'Range loop
+ X := HT.Buckets (Indx);
+
+ if X /= null then
+ M := 1;
+ loop
+ X := Next (X);
+ exit when X = null;
+ M := M + 1;
+ end loop;
+
+ Hash_Type'Write (Stream, Indx);
+ Count_Type'Base'Write (Stream, M);
+
+ X := HT.Buckets (Indx);
+ for J in Count_Type range 1 .. M loop
+ Write (Stream, X);
+ X := Next (X);
+ end loop;
+
+ pragma Assert (X = null);
+ end if;
+ end loop;
+ end Generic_Write;
+
+ -----------
+ -- Index --
+ -----------
+
+ function Index
+ (Buckets : Buckets_Type;
+ Node : Node_Access) return Hash_Type is
+ begin
+ return Hash_Node (Node) mod Buckets'Length;
+ end Index;
+
+ function Index
+ (Hash_Table : Hash_Table_Type;
+ Node : Node_Access) return Hash_Type is
+ begin
+ return Index (Hash_Table.Buckets.all, Node);
+ end Index;
+
+ ----------
+ -- Move --
+ ----------
+
+ procedure Move (Target, Source : in out Hash_Table_Type) is
+ begin
+ if Target'Address = Source'Address then
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ if Source.Busy > 0 then
+ raise Program_Error;
+ end if;
+
+ Clear (Target);
+
+ declare
+ Buckets : constant Buckets_Access := Target.Buckets;
+ begin
+ Target.Buckets := Source.Buckets;
+ Source.Buckets := Buckets;
+ end;
+
+ Target.Length := Source.Length;
+ Source.Length := 0;
+ end Move;
+
+ ----------
+ -- Next --
+ ----------
+
+ function Next
+ (HT : Hash_Table_Type;
+ Node : Node_Access) return Node_Access
+ is
+ Result : Node_Access := Next (Node);
+
+ begin
+ if Result /= null then
+ return Result;
+ end if;
+
+ for Indx in Index (HT, Node) + 1 .. HT.Buckets'Last loop
+ Result := HT.Buckets (Indx);
+
+ if Result /= null then
+ return Result;
+ end if;
+ end loop;
+
+ return null;
+ end Next;
+
+ ----------------------
+ -- Reserve_Capacity --
+ ----------------------
+
+ procedure Reserve_Capacity
+ (HT : in out Hash_Table_Type;
+ N : Count_Type)
+ is
+ NN : Hash_Type;
+
+ begin
+ if HT.Buckets = null then
+ if N > 0 then
+ NN := Prime_Numbers.To_Prime (N);
+ HT.Buckets := new Buckets_Type (0 .. NN - 1);
+ end if;
+
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ if HT.Length = 0 then
+ if N = 0 then
+ Free (HT.Buckets);
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ if N = HT.Buckets'Length then
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ NN := Prime_Numbers.To_Prime (N);
+
+ if NN = HT.Buckets'Length then
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ declare
+ X : Buckets_Access := HT.Buckets;
+ begin
+ HT.Buckets := new Buckets_Type (0 .. NN - 1);
+ Free (X);
+ end;
+
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ if N = HT.Buckets'Length then
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ if N < HT.Buckets'Length then
+ if HT.Length >= HT.Buckets'Length then
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ NN := Prime_Numbers.To_Prime (HT.Length);
+
+ if NN >= HT.Buckets'Length then
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ else
+ NN := Prime_Numbers.To_Prime (Count_Type'Max (N, HT.Length));
+
+ if NN = HT.Buckets'Length then -- can't expand any more
+ return;
+ end if;
+ end if;
+
+ if HT.Busy > 0 then
+ raise Program_Error;
+ end if;
+
+ Rehash : declare
+ Dst_Buckets : Buckets_Access := new Buckets_Type (0 .. NN - 1);
+ Src_Buckets : Buckets_Access := HT.Buckets;
+
+ L : Count_Type renames HT.Length;
+ LL : constant Count_Type := L;
+
+ Src_Index : Hash_Type := Src_Buckets'First;
+
+ begin
+ while L > 0 loop
+ declare
+ Src_Bucket : Node_Access renames Src_Buckets (Src_Index);
+
+ begin
+ while Src_Bucket /= null loop
+ declare
+ Src_Node : constant Node_Access := Src_Bucket;
+
+ Dst_Index : constant Hash_Type :=
+ Index (Dst_Buckets.all, Src_Node);
+
+ Dst_Bucket : Node_Access renames Dst_Buckets (Dst_Index);
+
+ begin
+ Src_Bucket := Next (Src_Node);
+
+ Set_Next (Src_Node, Dst_Bucket);
+
+ Dst_Bucket := Src_Node;
+ end;
+
+ pragma Assert (L > 0);
+ L := L - 1;
+ end loop;
+ exception
+ when others =>
+ -- If there's an error computing a hash value during a
+ -- rehash, then AI-302 says the nodes "become lost." The
+ -- issue is whether to actually deallocate these lost nodes,
+ -- since they might be designated by extant cursors. Here
+ -- we decide to deallocate the nodes, since it's better to
+ -- solve real problems (storage consumption) rather than
+ -- imaginary ones (the user might, or might not, dereference
+ -- a cursor designating a node that has been deallocated),
+ -- and because we have a way to vet a dangling cursor
+ -- reference anyway, and hence can actually detect the
+ -- problem.
+
+ for Dst_Index in Dst_Buckets'Range loop
+ declare
+ B : Node_Access renames Dst_Buckets (Dst_Index);
+ X : Node_Access;
+ begin
+ while B /= null loop
+ X := B;
+ B := Next (X);
+ Free (X);
+ end loop;
+ end;
+ end loop;
+
+ Free (Dst_Buckets);
+ raise Program_Error;
+ end;
+
+ Src_Index := Src_Index + 1;
+ end loop;
+
+ HT.Buckets := Dst_Buckets;
+ HT.Length := LL;
+
+ Free (Src_Buckets);
+ end Rehash;
+ end Reserve_Capacity;
+
+end Ada.Containers.Hash_Tables.Generic_Operations;