1 files changed, 0 insertions, 71 deletions
diff --git a/gcc-4.2.1-5666.3/gcc/doc/interface.texi b/gcc-4.2.1-5666.3/gcc/doc/interface.texi
deleted file mode 100644
index f6fdc329e..000000000
--- a/gcc-4.2.1-5666.3/gcc/doc/interface.texi
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,71 +0,0 @@
-@c Copyright (C) 1988, 1989, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998,
-@c 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
-@c This is part of the GCC manual.
-@c For copying conditions, see the file gcc.texi.
-
-@node Interface
-@chapter Interfacing to GCC Output
-@cindex interfacing to GCC output
-@cindex run-time conventions
-@cindex function call conventions
-@cindex conventions, run-time
-
-GCC is normally configured to use the same function calling convention
-normally in use on the target system.  This is done with the
-machine-description macros described (@pxref{Target Macros}).
-
-@cindex unions, returning
-@cindex structures, returning
-@cindex returning structures and unions
-However, returning of structure and union values is done differently on
-some target machines.  As a result, functions compiled with PCC
-returning such types cannot be called from code compiled with GCC,
-and vice versa.  This does not cause trouble often because few Unix
-library routines return structures or unions.
-
-GCC code returns structures and unions that are 1, 2, 4 or 8 bytes
-long in the same registers used for @code{int} or @code{double} return
-values.  (GCC typically allocates variables of such types in
-registers also.)  Structures and unions of other sizes are returned by
-storing them into an address passed by the caller (usually in a
-register).  The target hook @code{TARGET_STRUCT_VALUE_RTX}
-tells GCC where to pass this address.
-
-By contrast, PCC on most target machines returns structures and unions
-of any size by copying the data into an area of static storage, and then
-returning the address of that storage as if it were a pointer value.
-The caller must copy the data from that memory area to the place where
-the value is wanted.  This is slower than the method used by GCC, and
-fails to be reentrant.
-
-On some target machines, such as RISC machines and the 80386, the
-standard system convention is to pass to the subroutine the address of
-where to return the value.  On these machines, GCC has been
-configured to be compatible with the standard compiler, when this method
-is used.  It may not be compatible for structures of 1, 2, 4 or 8 bytes.
-
-@cindex argument passing
-@cindex passing arguments
-GCC uses the system's standard convention for passing arguments.  On
-some machines, the first few arguments are passed in registers; in
-others, all are passed on the stack.  It would be possible to use
-registers for argument passing on any machine, and this would probably
-result in a significant speedup.  But the result would be complete
-incompatibility with code that follows the standard convention.  So this
-change is practical only if you are switching to GCC as the sole C
-compiler for the system.  We may implement register argument passing on
-certain machines once we have a complete GNU system so that we can
-compile the libraries with GCC@.
-
-On some machines (particularly the SPARC), certain types of arguments
-are passed ``by invisible reference''.  This means that the value is
-stored in memory, and the address of the memory location is passed to
-the subroutine.
-
-@cindex @code{longjmp} and automatic variables
-If you use @code{longjmp}, beware of automatic variables.  ISO C says that
-automatic variables that are not declared @code{volatile} have undefined
-values after a @code{longjmp}.  And this is all GCC promises to do,
-because it is very difficult to restore register variables correctly, and
-one of GCC's features is that it can put variables in registers without
-your asking it to.