aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/gcc-4.9/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/alloc_comp_assign_10.f90
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorBen Cheng <bccheng@google.com>2014-03-25 22:37:19 -0700
committerBen Cheng <bccheng@google.com>2014-03-25 22:37:19 -0700
commit1bc5aee63eb72b341f506ad058502cd0361f0d10 (patch)
treec607e8252f3405424ff15bc2d00aa38dadbb2518 /gcc-4.9/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/alloc_comp_assign_10.f90
parent283a0bf58fcf333c58a2a92c3ebbc41fb9eb1fdb (diff)
downloadtoolchain_gcc-1bc5aee63eb72b341f506ad058502cd0361f0d10.tar.gz
toolchain_gcc-1bc5aee63eb72b341f506ad058502cd0361f0d10.tar.bz2
toolchain_gcc-1bc5aee63eb72b341f506ad058502cd0361f0d10.zip
Initial checkin of GCC 4.9.0 from trunk (r208799).
Change-Id: I48a3c08bb98542aa215912a75f03c0890e497dba
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc-4.9/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/alloc_comp_assign_10.f90')
-rw-r--r--gcc-4.9/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/alloc_comp_assign_10.f9059
1 files changed, 59 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gcc-4.9/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/alloc_comp_assign_10.f90 b/gcc-4.9/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/alloc_comp_assign_10.f90
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..808a2898c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc-4.9/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/alloc_comp_assign_10.f90
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+! { dg-do run }
+!
+! Test the fix for PR39879, in which gfc gagged on the double
+! defined assignment where the rhs had a default initialiser.
+!
+! Contributed by David Sagan <david.sagan@gmail.com>
+!
+module test_struct
+ interface assignment (=)
+ module procedure tao_lat_equal_tao_lat
+ end interface
+ type bunch_params_struct
+ integer n_live_particle
+ end type
+ type tao_lattice_struct
+ type (bunch_params_struct), allocatable :: bunch_params(:)
+ type (bunch_params_struct), allocatable :: bunch_params2(:)
+ end type
+ type tao_universe_struct
+ type (tao_lattice_struct), pointer :: model, design
+ character(200), pointer :: descrip => NULL()
+ end type
+ type tao_super_universe_struct
+ type (tao_universe_struct), allocatable :: u(:)
+ end type
+ type (tao_super_universe_struct), save, target :: s
+ contains
+ subroutine tao_lat_equal_tao_lat (lat1, lat2)
+ implicit none
+ type (tao_lattice_struct), intent(inout) :: lat1
+ type (tao_lattice_struct), intent(in) :: lat2
+ if (allocated(lat2%bunch_params)) then
+ lat1%bunch_params = lat2%bunch_params
+ end if
+ if (allocated(lat2%bunch_params2)) then
+ lat1%bunch_params2 = lat2%bunch_params2
+ end if
+ end subroutine
+end module
+
+program tao_program
+ use test_struct
+ implicit none
+ type (tao_universe_struct), pointer :: u
+ integer n, i
+ allocate (s%u(1))
+ u => s%u(1)
+ allocate (u%design, u%model)
+ n = 112
+ allocate (u%model%bunch_params(0:n), u%design%bunch_params(0:n))
+ u%design%bunch_params%n_live_particle = [(i, i = 0, n)]
+ u%model = u%design
+ u%model = u%design ! The double assignment was the cause of the ICE
+ if (.not. allocated (u%model%bunch_params)) call abort
+ if (any (u%model%bunch_params%n_live_particle .ne. [(i, i = 0, n)])) call abort
+ Deallocate (u%model%bunch_params, u%design%bunch_params)
+ deallocate (u%design, u%model)
+ deallocate (s%u)
+end program