Initial checkin of GCC 4.9.0 from trunk (r208799).

Change-Id: I48a3c08bb98542aa215912a75f03c0890e497dba

1 files changed, 36 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/gcc-4.9/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/typedef-init.C b/gcc-4.9/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/typedef-init.C
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..153303d21
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc-4.9/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/typedef-init.C
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-fpermissive" } // suppress default -pedantic-errors */
+
+/* This code used to be a legitimate, if dubious, extension.  However,
+   it's been broken since GCC 3.0 (caused ICE) and we have now removed
+   the extension.  See PR c/7353.
+
+   For cases A and C, C++ issues a warning in addition to the error,
+   since this construct appears to be a case of implicit int
+   (forbidden in std. C++) until we get to the equals sign.  */
+
+/* Case A: just the bare name = initializer.  */
+
+typedef A = 0;  /* { dg-error "does not name a type" "A" } */
+A a;            /* { dg-error "does not name a type" "A error cascade" } */
+
+/* Case B: with a type also.  */
+
+typedef int B = 0;  /* { dg-error "initialized" "B" } */
+B b;		    /* { dg-error "does not name a type" "B error cascade" } */
+
+/* C and D are the same as A and B, but wrapped in a structure;
+   field declarations go by a different code path in C++ (ick).  */
+
+struct S {
+  typedef C = 0; /* { dg-error "does not name a type" "C" } */
+  C c;		 /* { dg-error "" "C error cascade" } */
+
+  typedef int D = 0; /* { dg-error "initialized" "D" } */
+  D d;		     /* { dg-bogus "" "D error cascade" } */
+};
+
+template<int> void foo()
+{
+    typedef int i = 0; /* { dg-error "is initialized" } */
+}