blob: b4eaebb96c6596506750d6012a44edd6d1d6eac0 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
|
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--
Copyright (C) 2014-2016 The CyanogenMod Project
Copyright (C) 2016-2019 The LineageOS Project
Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
You may obtain a copy of the License at
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
limitations under the License.
-->
<!--Enable call recording for country: Brazil-->
<!--
Relevant laws and/or legal precedents:
Call recording is not a criminal offense when it the recording is made by one of the two
parties of said call. Interception by a third party is illegal and punishable by law, unless
done according to the requirements set out in Law 9296. There may be some debate, as far as the
use of a call recording as legitimate evidence. Further information is available in the
attached legal discussions below.
Law 9296 of the 24th of July 1996: (nonencrypted link)
http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l9296.htm
Constitution of Brazil, Art 5º, X and XII:
https://www2.camara.leg.br/legin/fed/consti/1988/constituicao-1988-5-outubro-1988-322142-publicacaooriginal-1-pl.html
Legal discussions:
https://direitosbrasil.com/gravar-conversa-e-crime/
https://meusitejuridico.com.br/2018/04/02/stj-e-licita-gravacao-de-conversa-feita-pelo-destinatario-de-solicitacao-de-vantagem-indevida
https://moisesandrade.jusbrasil.com.br/artigos/121944095/constitucionalidade-do-uso-da-gravacao-clandestina-como-meio-de-prova
-->
<resources>
</resources>
|
