summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/java/com/android/dialer/callrecord/res/values-mcc250/config.xml
blob: c1ac129295133e97e70ebe64f204de32fdfadf1f (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--
     Copyright (C) 2014-2016 The CyanogenMod Project
     Copyright (C) 2016-2019 The LineageOS Project

     Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
     you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
     You may obtain a copy of the License at

          http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0

     Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
     distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
     WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
     See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
     limitations under the License.
-->

<!--Enable call recording for country: Russia-->
<!--
     Relevant laws and/or legal precedents:
     Recording a phone call when not one of the two parties participating in said call is illegal
     and punishable by law. As a party to a phone call, one may record it without notifying the
     other side, as is evident in the decision of the Supreme Court of Russia for case 35-KG16-18,
     which was rendered on the 6th of December 2016. This concerns civil cases between two private
     citizens. Whether this covers cases involving legal entities or people holding a public
     position has not been researched. The key laws to consider are the Federal Law of 27th July
     2006, N 149-FZ, (amended on 18th March 2019) "Information, Information Technologies and
     Information Security" - article 9, subarticle 8, as well as the Civil Procedure Code of 2002,
     N 138-FZ (amended on the 27th December 2018), article 55. Citations of other pertinent laws may
     be found in the linked decision, starting at internal document page number 4.
     Supreme Court of Russia, Decision on case number 35-KG16-18: (nonencrypted link)
     http://www.supcourt.ru/stor_pdf.php?id=1502686
     Federal Law of 27th July 2006, N 149-FZ:
     https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_61798/35f4fb38534799919febebd589466c9838f571b2/
     Civil Procedure Code of 2002, N 138-FZ:
     https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_39570/b48406042a309ee368f395fb6f3be1d43c7cbfc2/
-->
<resources>

</resources>