diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'res/values-mcc440/config.xml')
| -rw-r--r-- | res/values-mcc440/config.xml | 51 |
1 files changed, 51 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/res/values-mcc440/config.xml b/res/values-mcc440/config.xml new file mode 100644 index 000000000..dc9c8fe5e --- /dev/null +++ b/res/values-mcc440/config.xml @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@ +<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> +<!-- + Copyright (C) 2014-2016 The CyanogenMod Project + Copyright (C) 2016-2019 The LineageOS Project + + Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); + you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. + You may obtain a copy of the License at + + http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 + + Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software + distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, + WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. + See the License for the specific language governing permissions and + limitations under the License. +--> + +<!--Enable call recording for country: Japan--> +<!--MCCs that conform to this country's legislation: 440 and 441--> +<!-- + Relevant laws and/or legal precedents: + Recording one's own calls is neither a criminal offense, nor illegal. Wiretapping and leaking + information gained from a recording is illegal and may be criminally punishable. Recording as + a third party is a criminal offense, when done so without the consent of at least one party to + the conversation. Recordings obtained without consent from both sides will not be admitted as + evidence in a criminal case, but are admitted as such in most civil cases, unless it was + obtained in a method, which the court deems as unacceptable. If the recording infringes one's + personal rights or discloses trade secrets, sharing said recording might lead to civil cases. + In work-related instances, one may record and divulge information under the protection of the + Whistleblower Protection Act of 2004. The Supreme Court of Japan's Decision of the 12th of July + 2000, case number 1999 (A) 96, was in favor of admitting a tape recording as evidence, which + was made by one party to a conversation, without the other party's consent. + Whistleblower Protection Act: + http://drasuszodis.lt/userfiles/Japan%20Whistleblower%20Protection%20Act.pdf + Decision of the Supreme Court of Japan: + http://www.courts.go.jp/app/hanrei_en/detail?id=494 + Legal articles: + https://www.moneypost.jp/292939 + https://president.jp/articles/-/15666 + https://www.hrpro.co.jp/trend_news.php?news_no=636 + https://kumaben.com/recording-audio-without-consent/ + https://www.mot-net.com/blog/efficiency-of-operations/6737 + https://milight-partners-law.hatenablog.com/entry/2015/08/31/152333 (nonsecure) + Legal discussion: + https://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/unyieldingspirit2007/24529523.html + +--> +<resources> + +</resources>
\ No newline at end of file |