1 files changed, 0 insertions, 51 deletions
diff --git a/java/com/android/dialer/callrecord/res/values-mcc440/config.xml b/java/com/android/dialer/callrecord/res/values-mcc440/config.xml
deleted file mode 100644
index dc9c8fe5e..000000000
--- a/java/com/android/dialer/callrecord/res/values-mcc440/config.xml
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,51 +0,0 @@
-<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
-<!--
-     Copyright (C) 2014-2016 The CyanogenMod Project
-     Copyright (C) 2016-2019 The LineageOS Project
-
-     Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
-     you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
-     You may obtain a copy of the License at
-
-          http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
-
-     Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
-     distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
-     WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
-     See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
-     limitations under the License.
--->
-
-<!--Enable call recording for country: Japan-->
-<!--MCCs that conform to this country's legislation: 440 and 441-->
-<!--
-     Relevant laws and/or legal precedents:
-     Recording one's own calls is neither a criminal offense, nor illegal. Wiretapping and leaking
-     information gained from a recording is illegal and may be criminally punishable. Recording as
-     a third party is a criminal offense, when done so without the consent of at least one party to
-     the conversation. Recordings obtained without consent from both sides will not be admitted as
-     evidence in a criminal case, but are admitted as such in most civil cases, unless it was
-     obtained in a method, which the court deems as unacceptable. If the recording infringes one's
-     personal rights or discloses trade secrets, sharing said recording might lead to civil cases.
-     In work-related instances, one may record and divulge information under the protection of the
-     Whistleblower Protection Act of 2004. The Supreme Court of Japan's Decision of the 12th of July
-     2000, case number 1999 (A) 96, was in favor of admitting a tape recording as evidence, which
-     was made by one party to a conversation, without the other party's consent.
-     Whistleblower Protection Act:
-     http://drasuszodis.lt/userfiles/Japan%20Whistleblower%20Protection%20Act.pdf
-     Decision of the Supreme Court of Japan:
-     http://www.courts.go.jp/app/hanrei_en/detail?id=494
-     Legal articles:
-     https://www.moneypost.jp/292939
-     https://president.jp/articles/-/15666
-     https://www.hrpro.co.jp/trend_news.php?news_no=636
-     https://kumaben.com/recording-audio-without-consent/
-     https://www.mot-net.com/blog/efficiency-of-operations/6737
-     https://milight-partners-law.hatenablog.com/entry/2015/08/31/152333 (nonsecure)
-     Legal discussion:
-     https://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/unyieldingspirit2007/24529523.html
-
--->
-<resources>
-
-</resources>
-\ No newline at end of file