From 9a1f81699cc05b58378ffb9aadb4e97677943791 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dan Bornstein Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 17:02:26 -0800 Subject: It's "opcode" not "opCode". Similarly "Opcode" not "OpCode". This appears to be the general worldwide consensus on the matter. Other residents of my office didn't seem to mind one way or the other how it's spelled in our code, but for whatever reason, it really bugged me. Change-Id: Ia0b73d19c54aefc0f543a9c9451dda22ee876a59 --- vm/compiler/codegen/arm/GlobalOptimizations.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'vm/compiler/codegen/arm/GlobalOptimizations.c') diff --git a/vm/compiler/codegen/arm/GlobalOptimizations.c b/vm/compiler/codegen/arm/GlobalOptimizations.c index 1cfa32b3a..c1e69c3e3 100644 --- a/vm/compiler/codegen/arm/GlobalOptimizations.c +++ b/vm/compiler/codegen/arm/GlobalOptimizations.c @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ static void applyRedundantBranchElimination(CompilationUnit *cUnit) thisLIR = NEXT_LIR(thisLIR)) { /* Branch to the next instruction */ - if (thisLIR->opCode == kThumbBUncond) { + if (thisLIR->opcode == kThumbBUncond) { ArmLIR *nextLIR = thisLIR; while (true) { @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ static void applyRedundantBranchElimination(CompilationUnit *cUnit) /* * Found real useful stuff between the branch and the target */ - if (!isPseudoOpCode(nextLIR->opCode)) + if (!isPseudoOpcode(nextLIR->opcode)) break; } } -- cgit v1.2.3