| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This splits off a new package, com.android.dex that contains
code for parsing and modelling dex files. This code is usable
both at build time (for compilation and analysis) and at runtime
(for introspection).
The original package, com.android.dx is the tool that compiles
.class files into .dex files. That package also includes utilities
for merging and querying dex files, all visible to the dx command
line application.
In a follow up change I'll move the new com.android.dex package
into the libcore/ project, and configure build rules so that it's
included in both dx.jar and core.jar. The core.jar will then be
able to use it for annotation processing.
Change-Id: I3c58cf87e728e4dda1925a0992c1ee7b8130e81a
(cherry picked from commit bab4abb07335d162ecdb8091fc395cf84803a580)
Conflicts:
dx/junit-tests/com/android/dx/util/BitIntSetTest.java
dx/junit-tests/com/android/dx/util/BitsTest.java
dx/junit-tests/com/android/dx/util/IntListTest.java
dx/junit-tests/com/android/dx/util/ListIntSetTest.java
dx/src/com/android/dex/Dex.java
dx/src/com/android/dex/TableOfContents.java
dx/src/com/android/dx/annotations/AnnotationAccess.java
dx/src/com/android/dx/command/Main.java
dx/src/com/android/dx/dex/code/OutputFinisher.java
dx/src/com/android/dx/dex/code/form/Form32s.java
dx/src/com/android/dx/dex/code/form/Form33x.java
dx/src/com/android/dx/dex/code/form/Form41c.java
dx/src/com/android/dx/dex/code/form/Form52c.java
dx/src/com/android/dx/gen/DexGenerator.java
dx/src/com/android/dx/merge/DexMerger.java
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The only benefit we were seeing is that one wrapped its toHuman
in quotes, the other didn't.
It was far too easy to use the wrong one. We had code defending
against that in NameValuePair and CstArray.
Change-Id: Ib2e6a1596b97decced37952d46e1831b7bcd0d5d
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This improves time to merge a trivial file with core.dex from
3.8 seconds to 0.8 seconds.
Also fixing read method names to be consistent with the spec.
Change-Id: I9033bcb497afe7a0d73e00cca14fa046b53a62bf
|
|\ |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This has no functional effect, because reading the signed leb128 value
as an unsignedleb128 still produces the same value. But the encoding is
1 byte longer in some cases.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The problem is that Scala code may have two variables with the same
name that are simultaneously active, and dx didn't expect that ever to
be the case. The fix is simply to catch another case where a local
variable might be considered to become superfluous due to having an
empty extent. However, this is really more of a workaround, as the
result will be that such code when attached to a debugger will only
show one of the two (or more) same-named variables as being active at
any given time.
The thing that prevents a more satisfactory solution is that the
optimization code can end up "splitting up" a single local into
multiple registers, and the only way we have to track them is by
name/type. So, even without Scala's rules, it was already possible to
find a same-named local in multiple registers, but with the status
quo, finding that really meant that a local was moving from one
register to another. The local variable table code handles that case
by automatically "ending" variables that appear to move, and the Scala
case looks just like that.
In the long run, we probably want to have a way to tag local variables
that isn't just name/type, but that will have to come later.
(As a bonus, I did some minor renaming for clarity while I was in the
territory.)
|
| | |
|
|/ |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|