diff options
author | Guy Harris <guy@alum.mit.edu> | 2005-01-03 10:10:23 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Guy Harris <guy@alum.mit.edu> | 2005-01-03 10:10:23 +0000 |
commit | 0e1e5e9febb5de8f32e9a6528e8140fabb877f13 (patch) | |
tree | 9c410b790e4c6fa5497aa34b926d30e93b624170 /wiretap | |
parent | fd56bd7689b5ee251f83fedec8e58042004ac72e (diff) | |
download | wireshark-0e1e5e9febb5de8f32e9a6528e8140fabb877f13.tar.gz wireshark-0e1e5e9febb5de8f32e9a6528e8140fabb877f13.tar.bz2 wireshark-0e1e5e9febb5de8f32e9a6528e8140fabb877f13.zip |
Give a bit more information on the "are there FCSes in the frame?"
issue.
svn path=/trunk/; revision=12938
Diffstat (limited to 'wiretap')
-rw-r--r-- | wiretap/netxray.c | 37 |
1 files changed, 32 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/wiretap/netxray.c b/wiretap/netxray.c index 76133c8d84..93bc759cdd 100644 --- a/wiretap/netxray.c +++ b/wiretap/netxray.c @@ -528,7 +528,9 @@ int netxray_open(wtap *wth, int *err, gchar **err_info) * * For now, we assume that to be true for 802.11 captures * as well; it appears to be the case for at least one - * such capture. + * such capture - the file doesn't have 0x34 and 0x12, + * and the 4 bytes at the end of the frames with 0xff + * are junk, not an FCS. * * For ISDN captures, it appears, at least in some * captures, to be similar, although I haven't yet @@ -536,16 +538,41 @@ int netxray_open(wtap *wth, int *err, gchar **err_info) * * XXX - should we do this for all encapsulation types? * - * XXX - is that actually a 2-byte little-endian 0x1234? - * What does that field signify? - * * XXX - is there some other field that *really* indicates * whether we have an FCS or not? The check of the time * stamp is bizarre, as we're checking the middle. * Perhaps hdr.realtick[0] is 0x00, in which case time * stamp units in the range 1192960 through 1193215 * correspond to captures with an FCS, but that's still - * a bit bizarre. + * a bit bizarre. Note that there are captures with + * a network type of 0 (Ethernet) and capture type + * of 0 (NDIS) that do, and that don't, have 0x34 0x12 + * in them, so it's not as if NDIS captures always lack + * FCSes - although the question then is whether any + * NDIS captures with 0x34 0x12 have frames with an FCS; + * if not, then it might be that no NDIS captures have + * FCSes. + * + * There are also captures with a network type of 4 (WAN), + * capture type of 6 (HDLC), and subtype of 2 (T1 PRI) that + * do, and that don't, have 0x34 0x12, so there are at least + * some captures taken with a pod that might lack an FCS. + * + * All captures I've seen that have 0x34 and 0x12 *and* + * have at least one frame with an FCS have a value of + * 0x01 in xxb[4]. No captures I've seen with a network + * type of 0 (Ethernet) missing 0x34 0x12 have 0x01 there, + * however. However, there's at least one capture + * without 0x34 and 0x12, with a network type of 0, + * and with 0x01 in xxb[4], *without* FCSes in the + * frames - the 4 bytes at the end are all zero - so it's + * not as simple as "xxb[4] = 0x01 means the 4 bytes at + * the end are FCSes". Also, there's also at least one + * 802.11 capture with an xxb[4] value of 0x01 with junk + * rather than an FCS at the end of the frame. + * + * There don't seem to be any other values in xxb or xxc + * that obviously correspond to frames having an FCS. */ if (version_major == 2) { if (hdr.realtick[1] == 0x34 && hdr.realtick[2] == 0x12) |