Add a test to make sure we're doing the right thing for throwing exceptions from deferred functions. This is LWG issue #2186. No change to the library needed.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@204678 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/www/cxx1y_status.html b/www/cxx1y_status.html
index 04c3730ae..8335a5fb1 100644
--- a/www/cxx1y_status.html
+++ b/www/cxx1y_status.html
@@ -266,7 +266,7 @@
 	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2359">2359</a></td><td>How does regex_constants::nosubs affect basic_regex::mark_count()?</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2360">2360</a></td><td>reverse_iterator::operator*() is unimplementable</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2104">2104</a></td><td>unique_lock move-assignment should not be noexcept</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
-	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2186">2186</a></td><td>Incomplete action on async/launch::deferred</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
+	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2186">2186</a></td><td>Incomplete action on async/launch::deferred</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2075">2075</a></td><td>Progress guarantees, lock-free property, and scheduling assumptions</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2288">2288</a></td><td>Inconsistent requirements for shared mutexes</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
 <!-- 	<tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr> -->